SOCREF-L Archives – March 2000, week 5

1. 3 refs for two duals.
   • Re: 3 refs for two duals. (37 lines)
     From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:27:48 -0500
   • Re: 3 refs for two duals. (152 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 13:01:27 -0500
   • Re: 3 refs for two duals. (19 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:00:34 -0500

2. 4, 3, 2, 1.........
   • 4, 3, 2, 1......... (51 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:05:07 -0500
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (67 lines)
     From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:32:13 -0700
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (31 lines)
     From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:56:24 CST
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (22 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:06:27 -0500
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (58 lines)
     From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:41:21 -0800
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (26 lines)
     From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:54:00 -0800
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (37 lines)
     From: John Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:39:08 -0400
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (80 lines)
     From: Terry Broderick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:15:24 -0800
   • Re: 4, 3, 2, 1......... (30 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:03:23 EST

3. a weekend in cajun country...
   • Re: a weekend in cajun country... (29 lines)
     From: Bates Family <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:08:58 -0800
   • Re: a weekend in cajun country... (32 lines)
     From: Don Brown <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:11:39 -0800

4. Advancement vs maintenance
   • Re: Advancement vs maintenance (22 lines)
     From: Ron Magin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:02:14 -0500
   • Re: Advancement vs maintenance (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:12:32 EST
   • Re: Advancement vs maintenance (40 lines)
     From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:59:43 -0500
   • Re: Advancement vs maintenance (47 lines)
     From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:50:37 EST

5. Assignor Contact
   • Assignor Contact (13 lines)
     From: Bill Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:36:01 -0600

6. Crude language
   • Crude language (42 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 01:31:57 -0500
   • Re: Crude language (62 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:46:40 -0500

7. dissent
   • Re: dissent (35 lines)
     From: Michael A. McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 12:46:10 -0500
   • Re: dissent (86 lines)
     From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:44:45 -0400
   • Re: dissent (109 lines)
     From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:07:01 -0600
   • Re: dissent (24 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:42:35 EST
   • Re: dissent (40 lines)
     From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:04:08 -0600
   • Re: dissent (43 lines)
     From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:44:47 -0000
   • Re: dissent (28 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:06:17 EST
   • Re: dissent (18 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:12:13 EST
   • Re: dissent (31 lines)
     From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:53:06 -0800
   • Re: dissent (32 lines)
     From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:10:47 -0700
   • Re: dissent (51 lines)
     From: Michael A. McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:45:17 -0500
   • Re: dissent (37 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:25:58 -0500
   • Re: dissent (44 lines)
     From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:15:10 -0500

8. Dual Refs
   • Re: Dual Refs (36 lines)
     From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:18:25 -0800
   • Re: Dual Refs (17 lines)
     From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:49:10 -0500
   • Re: Dual Refs (19 lines)
     From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:52:21 -0500
   • Re: Dual Refs (64 lines)
     From: Bradshaw Family <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 16:42:32 +1000
   • Re: Dual Refs (47 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:48:37 -0500
   • Re: Dual Refs (21 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:05:53 EST
   • Re: Dual Refs (23 lines)
     From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 08:30:11 CST
   • Re: Dual Refs (78 lines)
     From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:37:20 -0600
   • Re: Dual Refs (45 lines)
     From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:59:34 -0600
   • Re: Dual Refs (23 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:32:19 -0500
   • Re: Dual Refs (75 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:17:16 -0500
   • Re: Dual Refs (97 lines)
     From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:24:41 -0700
   • Re: Dual Refs (86 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:29:56 -0500
   • Re: Dual Refs (29 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 17:04:30 -0500

9. Foul Recognition -- Thoughts about headers
   • Re: Foul Recognition -- Thoughts about headers (25 lines)
     From: Craig Bohnert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:16:56 EST
   • Re: Foul Recognition -- Thoughts about headers (24 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 23:21:56 -0500

10. high school ref web site
    • high school ref web site (38 lines)
      From: Steven Ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:01:23 -0800
    • Re: high school ref web site (26 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:25:07 -0800
    • Re: high school ref web site (13 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:18:15 -0500

11. Hockey Refs
    • Re: Hockey Refs (41 lines)
      From: Mark Doherty <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:58:02 -0600

12. It's Their Game
    • It's Their Game (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:30:41 EST
    • Re: It's Their Game (61 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:32:28 -0600
    • Re: It's Their Game (43 lines)
      From: Rod Pelosi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:07:42 +1200

13. NFHS rule changes posted on web page
    • NFHS rule changes posted on web page (22 lines)
      From: carl schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:05:30 -0600
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (90 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:52:34 -0600
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (27 lines)
      From: John Sites <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:14:02 -0500
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (31 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:32:08 -0500
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (56 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:31:48 -0500
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (34 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:02:24 -0500
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (55 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:29:57 -0600
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (50 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:13:02 -0500
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (41 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:39:09 -0800
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (41 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:10:10 -0800
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (41 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:26:36 -0800
    • Re: NFHS rule changes posted on web page (61 lines)
      From: Dan & Maureen Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:43:40 -0800

14. Nike Cup
    • Nike Cup (14 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:40:29 EST
    • Nike Cup (14 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:42:59 EST
    • Re: Nike Cup (19 lines)
      From: Rod Pelosi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 15:50:30 +1200
    • Re: Nike Cup (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 20:41:36 -0500

15. Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time?
    • Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (63 lines)
      From: Dominguez, W Blake <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:39:35 -0600
    • Re: Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (29 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:05:09 -0500
    • Re: Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (90 lines)
      From: Mark L. Pieratt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:22:30 -0600
    • Re: Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (45 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:45:04 EST
    • Re: Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (25 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:55:19 -0700
    • Re: Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (41 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:52:46 -0800
    • Re: Player Cautioned Unfairly for Wasting Time? (46 lines)
      From: Mark L. Pieratt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:27:12 -0600

16. Red Card or Not for Deliberate Handling?
    • Re: Red Card or Not for Deliberate Handling? (38 lines)
      From: Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:47:27 -0800

17. Referee advancement as opposed to retention
    • Re: Referee advancement as opposed to retention (324 lines)
      From: les <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:10:32 -0500
    • Re: Referee advancement as opposed to retention (54 lines)
      From: Tom Grawey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 22:09:00 EST

18. referee wallet
    • referee wallet (36 lines)
      From: Steven Ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:10:00 -0800
    • Re: referee wallet (46 lines)
      From: Rod Pelosi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 00:34:23 +1200
    • Re: referee wallet (22 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 03:22:42 -0500
    • Re: referee wallet (10 lines)
      From: Paul Condran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:47:51 EST
    • Re: referee wallet (14 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:44:49 -0500
    • Re: referee wallet (54 lines)
      From: Derrick J. Mroz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:39:57 -0800

19. the "F" word or is it the "PH" word?
    • Re: the "F" word or is it the "PH" word? (28 lines)
      From: Don Hartnett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 04:52:51 EST
    • Re: the "F" word or is it the "PH" word? (29 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:13:21 -0400
    • Re: the "F" word or is it the "PH" word? (43 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 21:18:13 EST
    • Re: the "F" word or is it the "PH" word? (74 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 22:59:27 -0500
    • Re: the "F" word or is it the "PH" word? (31 lines)
      From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:59:17 -0600
    • Re: the "F" word or is it the "PH" word? (15 lines)
      From: Don Hartnett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:42:56 EST

20. the 3 worst soccer whistles
    • the 3 worst soccer whistles (497 lines)
      From: jb <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:02:06 -0500

21. The difference between "ITOOTR" & Mis-application
    • Re: The difference between "ITOOTR" & Mis-application (62 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:30:08 -0500

22. The difference between In the Opinion & Mis-application
    • Re: The difference between In the Opinion & Mis-application (99 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:35:54 -0500

23. toughest supposedly "easy" game (was: referee retention v. advancement)
    • Re: toughest supposedly "easy" game (was: referee retention v. advancement) (56 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:29:04 -0500

24. USYSA Rules
    • USYSA Rules (19 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:15:37 -0500
    • Re: USYSA Rules (28 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 06:35:44 -0500
    • Re: USYSA Rules (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:45:04 EST
    • Re: USYSA Rules (44 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:58:52 EST
    • Re: USYSA Rules (64 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:02:33 -0700

25. Verbalizing Calls
    • Verbalizing Calls (36 lines)
      From: Craig Bohnert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:20:57 EST
    • Verbalizing Calls (37 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:51:27 -0500
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (77 lines)
      From: Rick Fredricksen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 18:46:58 -0700
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (74 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 19:20:29 -0800
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (74 lines)
      From: Frederick Rich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:27:01 -0500
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (38 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:27:05 -0800
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (19 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:37:38 EST
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (29 lines)
      From: Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 22:14:51 -0800
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (67 lines)
      From: Bradshaw Family <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:32:47 +1000
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (36 lines)
      From: Bradshaw Family <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:39:16 +1000
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (54 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:43:11 -0000
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (33 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 08:53:38 CST
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (58 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:48:28 -0600
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (41 lines)
      From: Terry Broderick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:26:45 -0800
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:37:58 EST
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (31 lines)
      From: John Sites <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 16:49:37 -0500
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (75 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 22:25:47 -0500
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:29:09 -0600
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (28 lines)
      From: Brian Colfer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:56:31 -0800

26. Verbalizing Calls (Doesn't Always Communicate Like You Think)
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls (Doesn't Always Communicate Like You Think) (49 lines)
      From: Dominguez, W Blake <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:15:31 -0600

27. Verbalizing Calls - SIGNAL FIRST, dammit!
    • Re: Verbalizing Calls - SIGNAL FIRST, dammit! (109 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:24:26 -0500

28. Warzycha's controversial handball
    • Warzycha's controversial handball (35 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 12:12:45 -0500