SOCREF-L Archives – May 2000, week 1

1. and another thing...the 4th official.
   • and another thing...the 4th official. (55 lines)
     From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:34:30 -0700
   • Re: and another thing...the 4th official. (63 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 21:56:38 -0500
   • Re: and another thing...the 4th official. (198 lines)
     From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 20:50:15 -0700
   • Re: and another thing...the 4th official. (45 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 01:24:59 EDT
   • Re: and another thing...the 4th official. (32 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 00:55:59 -0400

2. AR's responsibility: touchline and offside
   • AR's responsibility: touchline and offside (35 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 14:03:16 -0400
   • Re: AR's responsibility: touchline and offside (34 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 18:29:10 -0400
   • Re: AR's responsibility: touchline and offside (32 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:52:07 -0700
   • Re: AR's responsibility: touchline and offside (48 lines)
     From: Brian Colfer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 19:01:12 -0700
   • Re: AR's responsibility: touchline and offside (71 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 23:19:15 -0400

3. Are players stupid?
   • Are players stupid? (30 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 10:50:29 -0400
   • Re: Are players stupid? (45 lines)
     From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:54:56 -0500
   • Re: Are players stupid? (19 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 14:25:37 EDT
   • Re: Are players stupid? (70 lines)
     From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 11:24:30 -0700
   • Re: Are players stupid? (19 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 14:42:21 EDT
   • Re: Are players stupid? (29 lines)
     From: Peter Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 15:57:40 -0700
   • Re: Are players stupid? (29 lines)
     From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:12:34 CDT

4. Are players stupid? (as referees)
   • Re: Are players stupid? (as referees) (86 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 12:01:09 EDT

5. At what age should we start calling offside?
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (17 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 00:02:40 EDT
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (17 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 00:09:14 EDT
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (34 lines)
     From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 09:36:11 CDT
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (60 lines)
     From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 09:40:26 -0500
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (15 lines)
     From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:40:29 EDT
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (45 lines)
     From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 21:17:02 -0700
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (37 lines)
     From: Bob Hamlin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 06:35:57 -0400
   • Re: At what age should we start calling offside? (32 lines)
     From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 06:59:50 -0700

6. blank message...
   • blank message... (16 lines)
     From: Edward J. Branley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:32:54 -0500

7. Blub, blub, blub
   • Blub, blub, blub (28 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 23:39:59 EDT
   • Re: Blub, blub, blub (33 lines)
     From: Bill Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:13:55 -0400
   • Re: Blub, blub, blub (15 lines)
     From: Jay Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:18:53 EDT
   • Re: Blub, blub, blub (47 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 06:21:48 -0700
   • Re: Blub, blub, blub (29 lines)
     From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 10:44:27 -0400

8. calling for the ball
   • calling for the ball (46 lines)
     From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 08:26:42 -0400
   • Re: calling for the ball (30 lines)
     From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 06:02:45 -0000
   • Re: calling for the ball (100 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:35:21 -0400
   • Re: calling for the ball (82 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:42:37 -0400
   • Re: calling for the ball (37 lines)
     From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 17:47:13 -0400

9. Carmel Indiana Assignor
   • Carmel Indiana Assignor (14 lines)
     From: John Ritter <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 06:56:30 -0700
   • Re: Carmel Indiana Assignor (33 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 18:46:37 EDT

10. comentarios de futbolistica -- ay, gringos! (muy largo)
    • Re: comentarios de futbolistica -- ay, gringos! (muy largo) (55 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 10:34:35 -0700
    • Re: comentarios de futbolistica -- ay, gringos! (muy largo) (26 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:45:16 -0500
    • Re: comentarios de futbolistica -- ay, gringos! (muy largo) (29 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 20:03:02 EDT
    • Re: comentarios de futbolistica -- ay, gringos! (muy largo) (15 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:27:08 -0700

11. comentarios futbolisticas
    • Re: comentarios futbolisticas (18 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 12:12:38 -0400

12. Defending Ol' Tommy
    • Defending Ol' Tommy (44 lines)
      From: Wally Wiegert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 23:46:21 -0400
    • Re: Defending Ol' Tommy (53 lines)
      From: Rod Pelosi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 17:48:15 +1200

13. Dissent or Disagreement ... RE: diving little girls...
    • Dissent or Disagreement ... RE: diving little girls... (71 lines)
      From: Brian Colfer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 19:22:58 -0700
    • Re: Dissent or Disagreement ... RE: diving little girls... (26 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:13:59 -0500

14. diving little girls...
    • Re: diving little girls... (86 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 21:12:16 -0700

15. Does being a player help being a referee??
    • Re: Does being a player help being a referee?? (98 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 12:27:32 -0400

16. DON'T OPEN "I LOVE YOU" - GO TO THE LINK BELOW
    • DON'T OPEN "I LOVE YOU" - GO TO THE LINK BELOW (18 lines)
      From: Rick Troup <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 13:57:02 -0500

17. Drop Ball and G.K. Question
    • Drop Ball and G.K. Question (14 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 16:51:07 -0600
    • Re: Drop Ball and G.K. Question (25 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 19:01:19 -0400
    • Re: Drop Ball and G.K. Question (35 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 18:03:14 -0700

18. EPL Humor
    • EPL Humor (17 lines)
      From: Steve Paulson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:36:25 -0700

19. Ethics, integrity and "game management"
    • Ethics, integrity and "game management" (107 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:16:38 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (15 lines)
      From: David Blenko <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:32:23 EDT
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (28 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:51:25 -0500
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (59 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:59:43 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (51 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:04:50 -0300
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:06:04 EDT
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (32 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:11:16 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (84 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:36:32 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (34 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:50:30 CDT
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (26 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:13:50 -0300
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (24 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:09:35 -0000
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (46 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:38:24 -0000
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (19 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 16:27:11 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (49 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 21:03:41 EDT
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (33 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 21:19:32 EDT
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (234 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 00:49:21 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (16 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 01:43:57 -0400

20. Ethics, integrity, and "game management"
    • Re: Ethics, integrity, and "game management" (11 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 19:29:46 -0400
    • Re: Ethics, integrity, and "game management" (18 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 20:47:41 -0700

21. FESTIVAL OF FOOTBALL (SOCCER)
    • FESTIVAL OF FOOTBALL (SOCCER) (50 lines)
      From: J Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 13:36:49 -0700

22. Football Confederation Referees
    • Football Confederation Referees (75 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 08:55:55 -0400
    • Re: Football Confederation Referees (29 lines)
      From: John Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 10:25:47 -0400
    • Re: Football Confederation Referees (24 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 22:00:43 -0700

23. FW: VIRUS ALERT - VBS/LoveLetter.worm
    • FW: VIRUS ALERT - VBS/LoveLetter.worm (463 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 20:03:39 -0700

24. Fwd: URGENT! Please READ.
    • Fwd: URGENT! Please READ. (146 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:57:13 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: URGENT! Please READ. (32 lines)
      From: Robert Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 10:18:31 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: URGENT! Please READ. (67 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 10:52:55 -0400
    • Re: Fwd: URGENT! Please READ. (118 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 11:32:46 -0400

25. Fwd: WENGER -- PLAYERS AND MANAGERS TO BLAME ...
    • Fwd: WENGER -- PLAYERS AND MANAGERS TO BLAME ... (123 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 00:11:22 -0400

26. gamesmanship at the PK
    • gamesmanship at the PK (19 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 11:49:26 -0500

27. GK & OGSO
    • GK & OGSO (59 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 10:39:09 -0400
    • Re: GK & OGSO (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 21:19:30 EDT
    • Re: GK & OGSO (53 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 22:52:33 -0400
    • Re: GK & OGSO (16 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 22:55:24 EDT
    • Re: GK & OGSO (43 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 23:25:01 -0400
    • Re: GK & OGSO (33 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 23:30:30 -0400

28. Goalkeeper handling and second possession
    • Goalkeeper handling and second possession (34 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 12:12:45 -0400
    • Re: Goalkeeper handling and second possession (18 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 13:36:00 -0400

29. Help - Stupid Referee Tricks Please
    • Help - Stupid Referee Tricks Please (22 lines)
      From: Dan & Maureen Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:13:18 -0700
    • Re: Help - Stupid Referee Tricks Please (31 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 22:43:04 -0600

30. Home-town refs?
    • Home-town refs? (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 17:24:27 EDT
    • Re: Home-town refs? (64 lines)
      From: Joe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 23:55:19 -0400
    • Re: Home-town refs? (57 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:00:43 EDT
    • Re: Home-town refs? (24 lines)
      From: Gabriel G. Manrique <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 08:18:08 -0500
    • Re: Home-town refs? (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:43:25 EDT
    • Re: Home-town refs? (33 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 10:30:42 -0500
    • Re: Home-town refs? (26 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 21:40:37 EDT

31. How handle sotto voce insults/dig, dig, dig?
    • Re: How handle sotto voce insults/dig, dig, dig? (23 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 17:51:03 -0600

32. How handle sotto voce insults?
    • Re: How handle sotto voce insults? (40 lines)
      From: Dick Hafner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 May 0100 12:36:10 -0700
    • Re: How handle sotto voce insults? (59 lines)
      From: Edward J. Branley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:28:22 -0500
    • Re: How handle sotto voce insults? (81 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 21:43:23 -0700
    • Re: How handle sotto voce insults? (76 lines)
      From: Robert Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:06:42 -0400

33. Kudos for Keough! :o) Scorn for Schoen! :o(
    • Kudos for Keough! :o) Scorn for Schoen! :o( (56 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 18:50:47 -0400
    • Re: Kudos for Keough! :o) Scorn for Schoen! :o( (55 lines)
      From: N. Alderman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:42:44 -0400
    • Re: Kudos for Keough! :o) Scorn for Schoen! :o( (47 lines)
      From: Edward J. Branley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 07:47:42 -0500

34. Law Five & OSI shirt sizing
    • Re: Law Five & OSI shirt sizing (49 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 13:27:46 -0400

35. Liability question
    • Liability question (27 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 13:00:45 -0500
    • Re: Liability question (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:34:42 EDT
    • Re: Liability question (27 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:05:15 CDT
    • Re: Liability question (63 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:17:05 -0400
    • Re: Liability question (58 lines)
      From: Don Hartnett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:11:45 EDT
    • Re: Liability question (43 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:29:11 -0400
    • Re: Liability question (21 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 23:36:38 -0400
    • Re: Liability question (37 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:55:39 -0000
    • Re: Liability question (63 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 22:27:02 -0400
    • Re: Liability question (136 lines)
      From: les <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 09:38:22 -0400

36. New York - Information?
    • New York - Information? (13 lines)
      From: Bill Walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:40:26 -0500
    • Re: New York - Information? (29 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:10:29 -0400
    • Re: New York - Information? (29 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 08:10:33 -0500

37. Off list for a while
    • Off list for a while (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 08:51:12 EDT
    • Re: Off list for a while (29 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 08:58:57 -0400

38. Offside
    • Offside (41 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 12:27:49 -0500
    • Re: Offside (59 lines)
      From: Bill Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 12:55:57 -0500
    • Re: Offside (21 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:57:57 EDT
    • Re: Offside (25 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:01:48 -0500
    • Re: Offside (66 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:08:52 -0400
    • Re: Offside (49 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:05:06 -0500
    • Re: Offside (43 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:10:05 -0500
    • Re: Offside (25 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:23:38 -0400
    • Re: Offside (22 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:29:51 EDT
    • Re: Offside (37 lines)
      From: Bill Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:51:56 -0500
    • Re: Offside (30 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:02:44 -0500
    • Re: Offside (60 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 13:59:14 -0500
    • Re: Offside (87 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:11:44 -0400
    • Re: Offside (52 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 14:04:44 -0500
    • Re: Offside (33 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:41:12 -0400
    • Re: Offside (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:57:19 EDT
    • Re: Offside (63 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:30:20 -0400
    • Re: Offside (33 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:44:12 -0400
    • Re: Offside (74 lines)
      From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:47:11 -0500
    • Re: Offside (36 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:52:58 -0400
    • Re: Offside (38 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:13:28 EDT
    • Re: Offside (31 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 17:25:36 -0400
    • Re: Offside (56 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 16:30:42 -0500
    • Re: Offside (58 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 18:06:03 -0700
    • Re: Offside (70 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 19:47:03 -0400
    • Re: Offside (33 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:02:50 -0400
    • Re: Offside (19 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:01:26 EDT
    • Re: Offside (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:31:42 EDT
    • Re: Offside (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:38:54 EDT
    • Re: Offside (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 00:20:56 EDT
    • Re: Offside (30 lines)
      From: Gingerich, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 11:06:11 -0700
    • Re: Offside (26 lines)
      From: Roy Good <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 02:34:38 EDT
    • Re: Offside (31 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 09:37:06 EDT
    • Re: Offside (50 lines)
      From: Dan C. Heldman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 14:25:30 -0400
    • Re: Offside (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 14:38:42 EDT

39. Offside/Changing scenarios
    • Re: Offside/Changing scenarios (61 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:25:56 EDT

40. OGSO in EPL
    • Re: OGSO in EPL (39 lines)
      From: Tony Whatt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 11:53:34 +1000

41. OGSO in EPL.....the final whistle
    • Re: OGSO in EPL.....the final whistle (35 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:49:45 EDT

42. Opinions on Referee Feedback
    • Opinions on Referee Feedback (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 21:01:03 EDT
    • Re: Opinions on Referee Feedback (100 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 22:53:26 -0400
    • Re: Opinions on Referee Feedback (33 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 23:18:33 EDT
    • Re: Opinions on Referee Feedback (68 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 23:19:05 -0400

43. plano labor day - a limited budget
    • plano labor day - a limited budget (27 lines)
      From: Rick Troup <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 12:28:01 -0500

44. Quality of refing at U10
    • Re: Quality of refing at U10 (24 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 15:46:53 EDT

45. Quality of refing at U10, PK Mark
    • Re: Quality of refing at U10, PK Mark (21 lines)
      From: Steve Shaffer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:50:10 -0500

46. Question on OGSO
    • Re: Question on OGSO (45 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 21:28:49 -0700

47. Referee in languages other than English
    • Referee in languages other than English (33 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 12:12:05 -0400

48. referee names
    • referee names (17 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:01:15 -0700
    • Re: referee names (18 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 14:19:13 -0400
    • Re: referee names (25 lines)
      From: david_maclennan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 19:34:28 +0100
    • Re: referee names (20 lines)
      From: carl schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 14:10:32 -0500
    • Re: referee names (25 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:14:20 -0700
    • Re: referee names (40 lines)
      From: Ben van Maaren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 21:17:40 +0200
    • Re: referee names (14 lines)
      From: Eric Emery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 15:27:42 -0700
    • Re: referee names (21 lines)
      From: Tony Whatt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 08:55:27 +1000
    • Re: referee names (22 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 20:14:25 EDT
    • Re: referee names (73 lines)
      From: Ben van Maaren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 02:28:43 +0200
    • Re: referee names (32 lines)
      From: Laszlo Sarkany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 21:31:11 -0400
    • Re: referee names (30 lines)
      From: Laszlo Sarkany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 21:33:46 -0400
    • Re: referee names (25 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 22:43:18 -0700
    • Re: referee names (44 lines)
      From: Bradshaw Family <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 09:19:57 +1000
    • Re: referee names (29 lines)
      From: Bradshaw Family <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 09:29:36 +1000
    • Re: referee names (18 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 21:35:57 -0400

49. Reflections upon Lessons
    • Reflections upon Lessons (70 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 08:36:49 -0400
    • Re: Reflections upon Lessons (32 lines)
      From: Gabriel G. Manrique <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 08:04:19 -0500
    • Re: Reflections upon Lessons (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:11:06 EDT
    • Re: Reflections upon Lessons (117 lines)
      From: Hendley Paul P <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 09:36:15 -0400
    • Re: Reflections upon Lessons (37 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 08:42:08 CDT
    • Re: Reflections upon Lessons (143 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 14:28:37 -0400
    • Re: Reflections upon Lessons (33 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 16:35:53 -0400

50. returning the trophy
    • returning the trophy (10 lines)
      From: Rick Troup <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:47:32 -0500

51. Rev v. Fusion Fines
    • Rev v. Fusion Fines (23 lines)
      From: N. Alderman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 10:31:41 -0400

52. Revs game on saturday- final minute take down
    • Revs game on saturday- final minute take down (22 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 09:57:34 -0700
    • Re: Revs game on saturday- final minute take down (30 lines)
      From: Robert Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 13:42:48 -0400
    • Re: Revs game on saturday- final minute take down (54 lines)
      From: Jeffrey N. Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 18:01:09 -0400

53. San Diego contact for referee
    • San Diego contact for referee (22 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 17:34:28 -0400
    • Re: San Diego contact for referee (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 17:57:10 -0400

54. Seeing ball into touch behind you
    • Seeing ball into touch behind you (27 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 09:02:13 -0500
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (52 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 10:48:14 -0400
    • Seeing ball into touch behind you (33 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:16:20 -0400
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (57 lines)
      From: Bill Ukas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 11:19:05 -0400
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 12:07:10 EDT
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 12:10:05 EDT
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (42 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 20:15:12 -0700
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (78 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 08:23:08 -0400
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (63 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:21:53 -0700
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (110 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 08:29:41 -0400
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (16 lines)
      From: Albert Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 23:24:31 EDT
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (32 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 17:31:30 -0400
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (34 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 18:54:39 -0400
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (30 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 19:19:55 -0700
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (45 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 20:33:46 -0700
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (21 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 20:45:58 -0700
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (19 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 23:56:03 -0400

55. Seeing the ball into touch behind you
    • Re: Seeing the ball into touch behind you (46 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:14:13 -0400
    • Re: Seeing the ball into touch behind you (73 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:22:31 -0500

56. Shoe and clothing suggestions.
    • Re: Shoe and clothing suggestions. (89 lines)
      From: Don Hartnett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 00:21:49 EDT

57. Still room for referee candidates in Eastern Massachusetts
    • Still room for referee candidates in Eastern Massachusetts (23 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 07:38:04 -0400

58. TALK: Come to the friendliest little tournament in the Ozarks
    • TALK: Come to the friendliest little tournament in the Ozarks (68 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 13:47:26 EDT

59. to: Tommy Smyth, ESPN Soccer Analyst
    • to: Tommy Smyth, ESPN Soccer Analyst (51 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:00:57 -0400

60. Today's Spanish game
    • Today's Spanish game (33 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:59:15 -0400
    • Re: Today's Spanish game (27 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 00:21:16 EDT

61. Training new refs
    • Training new refs (62 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 12:22:25 -0400
    • Re: Training new refs (122 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 14:29:59 -0400
    • Re: Training new refs (28 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 13:46:52 -0500
    • Re: Training new refs (90 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 15:28:16 -0500
    • Re: Training new refs (39 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 22:02:00 -0400
    • Re: Training new refs (51 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 23:20:30 -0400

62. Training New Refs
    • Re: Training New Refs (26 lines)
      From: Ken Loomis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 15:02:07 -0400

63. Two from the weekend
    • Two from the weekend (32 lines)
      From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 22:44:51 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (51 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 23:57:40 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (42 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 08:25:57 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (51 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 08:31:23 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (33 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 05:53:13 -0000
    • Re: Two from the weekend (25 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 09:18:52 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (80 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 12:08:54 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (29 lines)
      From: Richard Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 20:43:55 EDT
    • Re: Two from the weekend (31 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 14:39:09 -0700
    • Re: Two from the weekend (30 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:22:07 EDT
    • Re: Two from the weekend (29 lines)
      From: Mark Mittelstadt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 18:27:46 -0400
    • Re: Two from the weekend (49 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:12:27 -0700

64. U10 PK mark
    • Re: U10 PK mark (15 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:52:40 EDT
    • Re: U10 PK mark (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 17:01:40 EDT
    • Re: U10 PK mark (26 lines)
      From: Mike Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 18:30:17 EDT
    • Re: U10 PK mark (18 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 3 May 2000 01:28:31 EDT

65. unsubscribe
    • unsubscribe (14 lines)
      From: Stepehen Bell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 07:11:12 -0400

66. Urgent warnings, love letters and Bill Gates (NON-REFEREEING)
    • Urgent warnings, love letters and Bill Gates (NON-REFEREEING) (58 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:14:18 -0400
    • Re: Urgent warnings, love letters and Bill Gates (NON-REFEREEING) (63 lines)
      From: Gil Dreger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:46:23 -0400
    • Re: Urgent warnings, love letters and Bill Gates (NON-REFEREEING) (12 lines)
      From: David Blenko <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 20:32:50 EDT

67. URGENT! Please READ.
    • Re: URGENT! Please READ. (15 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 19:35:18 EDT
    • Re: URGENT! Please READ. (34 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 21:44:06 -0600
    • Re: URGENT! Please READ. (12 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 00:52:35 -0400

68. What % of player-refs are/were GKs?
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (30 lines)
      From: Patrick Donohoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:44:42 -0400

69. What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid? )
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid? ) (34 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 15:21:58 -0500

70. What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?)
    • What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (24 lines)
      From: Eric Emery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 13:13:34 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (38 lines)
      From: Bill Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:26:47 -0500
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:29:03 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (21 lines)
      From: Gene Sours <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 13:31:58 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (24 lines)
      From: Dave Weissig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 16:56:52 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 17:44:37 -0400
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (41 lines)
      From: Steve Paulson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 14:48:35 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (44 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 15:03:15 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (43 lines)
      From: Richard B. Hull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:16:03 -0400
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (13 lines)
      From: chuck ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:13:09 -0400
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (49 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 15:11:33 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (37 lines)
      From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 09:29:13 +1000
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 19:54:37 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (39 lines)
      From: Brian Colfer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 22:17:55 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 08:50:57 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (29 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 09:26:22 -0400
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (14 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:05:21 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (17 lines)
      From: David Blenko <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:27:30 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (22 lines)
      From: Doug Epps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:33:44 -0500
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (52 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 13:02:00 -0300
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (14 lines)
      From: David Blenko <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 12:15:56 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (30 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 10:19:06 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (21 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 16:11:36 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (34 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 19:06:19 -0500
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (27 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 22:52:21 -0400
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (26 lines)
      From: David Blenko <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 20:53:34 EDT
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (30 lines)
      From: Brian Colfer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 00:58:34 -0700
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (20 lines)
      From: David Blenko <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 18:23:46 EDT

71. What can they be thinking?
    • What can they be thinking? (87 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:50:23 -0400
    • Re: What can they be thinking? (26 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:44:34 CDT
    • Re: What can they be thinking? (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 16:56:01 EDT

72. What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way in front of an attacker?
    • What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way in front of an attacker? (37 lines)
      From: David Hoerl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 16:59:01 -0400

73. What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way in front ofan attacker?
    • Re: What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way in front ofan attacker? (47 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 19:41:43 -0700

74. What would you call on an attacker...
    • Re: What would you call on an attacker... (51 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 18:09:58 -0400

75. What's the real virus here? (Love y'all ;=)
    • What's the real virus here? (Love y'all ;=) (43 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 6 May 2000 20:51:58 -0400

76. Who officiated Dallas at Columbus on Sat evening? (no scores)
    • Re: Who officiated Dallas at Columbus on Sat evening? (no scores) (67 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 08:10:23 -0400
    • Re: Who officiated Dallas at Columbus on Sat evening? (no scores) (29 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 17:31:51 -0400
    • Re: Who officiated Dallas at Columbus on Sat evening? (no scores) (51 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 18:13:50 -0400