SOCREF-L Archives – May 2000, week 2

1. (plus question on impeding)---A reply
   • Re: (plus question on impeding)---A reply (29 lines)
     From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 07:56:07 EDT
   • Re: (plus question on impeding)---A reply (53 lines)
     From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 08:37:28 -0400
   • Re: (plus question on impeding)---A reply (26 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:45:52 EDT
   • Re: (plus question on impeding)---A reply (27 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 13:28:21 -0500
   • Re: (plus question on impeding)---A reply (21 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:04:35 EDT

2. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (115 lines)
     From: Mike.Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 02:01:24 -0400

3. A Little Help from our Friends
   • A Little Help from our Friends (113 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 11:12:18 -0400
   • Re: A Little Help from our Friends (23 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 11:25:16 -0500

4. Advantage in PA
   • Advantage in PA (30 lines)
     From: Dan Cawley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:59:19 -0500
   • Re: Advantage in PA (21 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:32:08 -0400
   • Re: Advantage in PA (27 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:56:39 EDT
   • Re: Advantage in PA (19 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:30:01 -0500
   • Re: Advantage in PA (31 lines)
     From: Umar Hassan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:47:35 -0500
   • Re: Advantage in PA (54 lines)
     From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:07:49 -0700
   • Re: Advantage in PA (93 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 20:46:29 -0400
   • Re: Advantage in PA (42 lines)
     From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:13:39 -0700
   • Re: Advantage in PA (48 lines)
     From: The Emerys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 21:12:45 -0700
   • Re: Advantage in PA (97 lines)
     From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 01:07:54 -0400
   • Re: Advantage in PA (37 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 08:41:42 EDT
   • Re: Advantage in PA (30 lines)
     From: John Andrew <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:47:39 -0400
   • Re: Advantage in PA (36 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:52:31 -0400
   • Re: Advantage in PA (35 lines)
     From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:10:22 CDT
   • Re: Advantage in PA (37 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:01:51 -0400
   • Re: Advantage in PA (38 lines)
     From: Dan Cawley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 14:51:16 -0500
   • Re: Advantage in PA (21 lines)
     From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 15:40:34 -0700

5. AR's responsibility: touchline and offside
   • Re: AR's responsibility: touchline and offside (19 lines)
     From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:51:39 -0500

6. Assigner Difficulties ~ AGAIN
   • Assigner Difficulties ~ AGAIN (40 lines)
     From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 21:28:33 EDT
   • Re: Assigner Difficulties ~ AGAIN (29 lines)
     From: Jay Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:11:37 EDT
   • Re: Assigner Difficulties ~ AGAIN (40 lines)
     From: gabriel manrique <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:24:20 -0500

7. Ball in air - defender's technique
   • Ball in air - defender's technique (39 lines)
     From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:14:03 -0400

8. Cutting Fingernails
   • Cutting Fingernails (29 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 20:23:13 -0500

9. Dehyrdation-Learning the Hard Way
   • Dehyrdation-Learning the Hard Way (39 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 11:45:46 -0500

10. DFK wall management
    • DFK wall management (28 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 19:47:53 EDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (44 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:21:24 -0700
    • Re: DFK wall management (48 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:33:36 -0700
    • Re: DFK wall management (44 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 22:09:49 -0500
    • Re: DFK wall management (65 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 23:18:36 -0500
    • DFK wall management (25 lines)
      From: Mihail Faina <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:48:42 -0400
    • Re: DFK wall management (27 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:39:04 EDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (21 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 10:59:41 -0500
    • Re: DFK wall management (39 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:18:29 CDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (28 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:28:14 EDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (48 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:24:19 -0500
    • Re: DFK wall management (53 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:53:08 -0500
    • Re: DFK wall management (20 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 20:14:30 EDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (35 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 21:25:56 -0400
    • Re: DFK wall management (36 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 01:36:25 EDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (36 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 01:16:55 -0400
    • Re: DFK wall management (24 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 06:24:15 EDT
    • DFK wall management (26 lines)
      From: Mihail Faina <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:25:34 -0400
    • Re: DFK wall management (39 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 08:56:40 CDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (40 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:03:02 CDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (33 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 10:03:34 EDT
    • Re: DFK wall management (47 lines)
      From: Kenneth R Jameson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:00:31 -0700

11. DFK wall management---A reply
    • Re: DFK wall management---A reply (47 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:53:22 EDT

12. Ethics, integrity and "game management"
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (25 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 05:28:26 -0000
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (34 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 05:33:03 -0000
    • Re: Ethics, integrity and "game management" (59 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 23:51:53 -0400

13. getting in to trouble
    • getting in to trouble (23 lines)
      From: Geoff Davis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:15:56 -0400
    • Re: getting in to trouble (28 lines)
      From: Pazirandehs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 21:17:22 -0700
    • Re: getting in to trouble (20 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 10:54:46 -0500

14. GK & OGSO
    • Re: GK & OGSO (34 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 11:00:49 -0500
    • Re: GK & OGSO (56 lines)
      From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 01:01:32 -0500
    • Re: GK & OGSO (39 lines)
      From: CDH <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:52:01 -0400

15. history of the game
    • history of the game (14 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 13:03:36 -0500

16. How much forward must the kickoff go?
    • How much forward must the kickoff go? (31 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 12:29:08 -0600
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (43 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:42:11 -0500
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (31 lines)
      From: Dave Weissig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:47:23 EDT
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (41 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:45:31 -0500
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (42 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:20:34 -0700
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (32 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 19:47:12 -0400
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (32 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 10:42:43 -0600
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (20 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 12:49:01 CDT
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (26 lines)
      From: CDH <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:18:52 -0400
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (33 lines)
      From: Terry Broderick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:16:55 -0700
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (52 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:43:55 -0700
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (34 lines)
      From: The Salganiks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 20:58:07 -0400
    • Re: How much forward must the kickoff go? (30 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 23:10:11 -0400

17. Interesting happening this weekend
    • Interesting happening this weekend (25 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:26:59 -0600

18. Killing Quick Kicks
    • Killing Quick Kicks (30 lines)
      From: Bill Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:58:03 -0400
    • Re: Killing Quick Kicks (29 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 18:30:14 -0400
    • Re: Killing Quick Kicks (34 lines)
      From: Pazirandehs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 16:51:37 -0700
    • Re: Killing Quick Kicks (25 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 23:12:20 EDT

19. Kudos for Keough! :o) Scorn for Schoen! :o(
    • Re: Kudos for Keough! :o) Scorn for Schoen! :o( (82 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 07:45:57 -0600

20. Lesson, Hopefully, Learned
    • Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (85 lines)
      From: Robert T. Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 09:15:25 -0400
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (91 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:42:35 -0300
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (53 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:20:02 -0400
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:56:13 EDT
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (50 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 13:32:02 -0300
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (66 lines)
      From: Jose Cordova <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 13:32:53 -0500
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (55 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:54:42 -0700
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (66 lines)
      From: Pazirandehs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 22:19:26 -0700
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (29 lines)
      From: Robert T. Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:35:30 -0400
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (48 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:08:20 -0400
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (78 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 01:37:57 -0400
    • Re: Lesson, Hopefully, Learned (54 lines)
      From: James D. Hanson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:59:26 -0500

21. Let me rethink these items
    • Let me rethink these items (38 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 14:24:41 -0700

22. Looking for games
    • Looking for games (22 lines)
      From: Tom Grawey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 17:33:56 EDT

23. Lost Mail
    • Lost Mail (16 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 22:18:14 -0500
    • Re: Lost Mail (26 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:12:19 -0600
    • Re: Lost Mail (22 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:58:06 -0400

24. Maryland
    • Maryland (22 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 18:15:37 -0700

25. Musings on the weekend
    • Musings on the weekend (46 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 22:33:11 -0700
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (26 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 11:19:14 EDT
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (38 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 12:19:06 -0400
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (40 lines)
      From: Dick Hafner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 8 May 0100 13:39:17 -0700
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (19 lines)
      From: Stacy Lopez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 18:12:32 -0500
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (50 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 19:53:16 -0700
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (37 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 20:40:52 -0700
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (14 lines)
      From: CDH <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:37:35 -0400
    • Re: Musings on the weekend (100 lines)
      From: Rod Pelosi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 15:23:05 +1200

26. New offside question
    • Re: New offside question (48 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 00:37:08 -0400
    • Re: New offside question (48 lines)
      From: David Hoerl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 07:24:23 -0400
    • Re: New offside question (66 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:31:17 -0500
    • Re: New offside question (27 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:01:48 -0500
    • Re: New offside question (41 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:02:40 -0500
    • Re: New offside question (17 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:12:18 -0500
    • Re: New offside question (29 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:41:53 -0500
    • Re: New offside question (27 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:13:00 -0500
    • Re: New offside question (47 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 14:40:46 -0500

27. New offside question (plus question on impeding)
    • Re: New offside question (plus question on impeding) (26 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 19:39:56 EDT

28. New offsides question
    • New offsides question (37 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:00:42 -0500
    • Re: New offsides question (51 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:39:29 -0600
    • Re: New offsides question (68 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:53:48 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (30 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:56:09 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (38 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:08:24 CDT
    • Re: New offsides question (41 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:00:31 -0500
    • Re: New offsides question (44 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 16:30:51 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (31 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 03:47:53 -0500
    • Re: New offsides question (22 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 03:55:43 -0500
    • Re: New offsides question (21 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 16:56:16 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (43 lines)
      From: Ed Griffis Lancaster PA USA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 17:59:56 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (42 lines)
      From: Ed Griffis Lancaster PA USA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 18:15:59 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (26 lines)
      From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 18:27:07 EDT
    • Re: New offsides question (95 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 17:15:53 -0600
    • Re: New offsides question (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 07:35:41 EDT
    • Re: New offsides question (21 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:25:07 -0400
    • Re: New offsides question (49 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:53:08 -0500
    • Re: New offsides question (52 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:44:27 -0500
    • Re: New offsides question (37 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:36:17 -0500

29. new USSF-proposed tool designed to stem ref abuse
    • new USSF-proposed tool designed to stem ref abuse (47 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 00:19:12 -0400
    • Re: new USSF-proposed tool designed to stem ref abuse (20 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 00:34:16 EDT
    • Re: new USSF-proposed tool designed to stem ref abuse (25 lines)
      From: Larry Lotito <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:05:16 -0700

30. Number of cards
    • Number of cards (41 lines)
      From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 18:55:32 +1000
    • Re: Number of cards (15 lines)
      From: Ron Magin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 09:35:44 -0400
    • Re: Number of cards (18 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 11:40:36 EDT
    • Re: Number of cards (26 lines)
      From: J Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 13:38:47 -0700
    • Re: Number of cards (84 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:10:21 -0700
    • Re: Number of cards (46 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 20:32:11 -0400
    • Re: Number of cards (17 lines)
      From: chuck ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 21:00:50 -0400
    • Re: Number of cards (22 lines)
      From: Dave Weissig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:18:20 EDT

31. Off list for a while
    • Re: Off list for a while (45 lines)
      From: Damian Arguello <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 07:05:20 -0700
    • Re: Off list for a while (23 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 11:05:18 -0400

32. Officiating's Transferrable Skills
    • Officiating's Transferrable Skills (210 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:01:33 -0400
    • Re: Officiating's Transferrable Skills (39 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:43:53 -0600
    • Re: Officiating's Transferrable Skills (41 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 14:00:29 -0500

33. Offside
    • Re: Offside (49 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 23:45:30 -0400
    • Re: Offside (48 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 23:46:08 -0400

34. Offsides on punts by GK
    • Offsides on punts by GK (16 lines)
      From: Cris de la Torre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 13:05:30 -0700
    • Re: Offsides on punts by GK (19 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 15:16:38 EDT
    • Re: Offsides on punts by GK (10 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:48:09 EDT
    • Re: Offsides on punts by GK (16 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:46:41 -0400

35. Offsides on punts by GK/odder way
    • Re: Offsides on punts by GK/odder way (20 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 15:37:58 -0600

36. Opinions on Referee Feedback
    • Re: Opinions on Referee Feedback (67 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:34:38 -0700

37. opium dreams re jewelry (was Talking to Players)
    • opium dreams re jewelry (was Talking to Players) (22 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:39:14 -0400
    • Re: opium dreams re jewelry (was Talking to Players) (17 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:54:42 -0400
    • Re: opium dreams re jewelry (was Talking to Players) (39 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 08:46:37 -0400

38. Origin of forward KO rule? (was: how far must the KO go forward)
    • Origin of forward KO rule? (was: how far must the KO go forward) (31 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 03:03:56 -0400
    • Re: Origin of forward KO rule? (was: how far must the KO go forward) (34 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 03:17:30 -0400
    • Re: Origin of forward KO rule? (was: how far must the KO go forward) (40 lines)
      From: Bill Ukas <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 05:40:18 -0400

39. OSI e-mail
    • OSI e-mail (15 lines)
      From: Mendoza, Armando Mr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 13:32:55 -0500

40. Play: passing versus dribbling (beating one opponent)
    • Re: Play: passing versus dribbling (beating one opponent) (38 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:13:08 CDT

41. Play: passing, etc. -- wrong list
    • Re: Play: passing, etc. -- wrong list (17 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:39:58 CDT

42. Player items of apparel
    • Player items of apparel (20 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:31:28 -0400
    • Re: Player items of apparel (41 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:38:37 -0700
    • Re: Player items of apparel (33 lines)
      From: Mike.Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:21:57 -0400
    • Re: Player items of apparel (41 lines)
      From: Roy Swazey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 22:55:06 -0400
    • Re: Player items of apparel (34 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 13:06:41 -0500
    • Re: Player items of apparel (15 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 23:46:14 EDT

43. Protecting the players
    • Protecting the players (81 lines)
      From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 14:20:34 +1000
    • Re: Protecting the players (53 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 00:38:32 -0400
    • Re: Protecting the players (83 lines)
      From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 17:04:16 +1000
    • Re: Protecting the players (52 lines)
      From: Edward J. Branley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 09:28:55 -0500
    • Re: Protecting the players (42 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 11:03:55 -0500
    • Re: Protecting the players (28 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 01:21:33 EDT
    • Re: Protecting the players (130 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 23:43:33 -0700

44. Question about Friendship Cup
    • Question about Friendship Cup (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 07:05:06 -0500
    • Re: Question about Friendship Cup (41 lines)
      From: Rod Pelosi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 15:20:14 +1200
    • Re: Question about Friendship Cup (30 lines)
      From: Stacy Lopez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:03:00 -0500
    • Re: Question about Friendship Cup (51 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 16:26:57 -0700
    • Re: Question about Friendship Cup (13 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 19:34:20 EDT
    • Re: Question about Friendship Cup (24 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 17:07:45 -0700
    • Re: Question about Friendship Cup (58 lines)
      From: Bradley B Condo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 21:27:17 -0600

45. Real Mad @ BMun: the CR and AR
    • Real Mad @ BMun: the CR and AR (137 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:04:06 -0400
    • Re: Real Mad @ BMun: the CR and AR (59 lines)
      From: Rich Fraser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 21:20:51 -0500

46. referee abuse in MLS?
    • referee abuse in MLS? (17 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 10:39:18 -0400

47. referee names
    • Re: referee names (24 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 20:04:33 -0700
    • Re: referee names (13 lines)
      From: chuck ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 23:44:47 -0400
    • Re: referee names (45 lines)
      From: Peter S. Saly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 20:22:29 -0601
    • Re: referee names (57 lines)
      From: Laszlo Sarkany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 22:04:41 -0400

48. referee names---A reply
    • Re: referee names---A reply (17 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 08:21:44 EDT

49. Rgt diag, passback, CK where?
    • Rgt diag, passback, CK where? (53 lines)
      From: Bob Hamlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 19:00:42 -0400
    • Re: Rgt diag, passback, CK where? (37 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 06:42:45 -0500

50. Rtg diag, passback, CK where?
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (31 lines)
      From: Gingerich, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:49:38 -0700
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:58:14 EDT
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (69 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 22:51:15 -0400
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (31 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 05:29:18 -0000
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (36 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 10:20:56 CDT
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (40 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:46:20 -0400
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (27 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:14:41 -0500
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (87 lines)
      From: Gingerich, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 11:47:20 -0700
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (50 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:18:41 -0400
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (142 lines)
      From: Mike.Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 17:11:51 -0400
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (55 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 15:32:12 -0700
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (47 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:32:30 -0400
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (63 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 05:27:52 -0000
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (45 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:41:33 CDT
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (58 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 10:21:29 -0700
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (28 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 18:09:27 -0400
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (62 lines)
      From: Gingerich, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:48:35 -0700
    • Re: Rtg diag, passback, CK where? (18 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 22:33:18 -0400

51. Seeing ball into touch behind you
    • Re: Seeing ball into touch behind you (38 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 7 May 2000 21:25:39 -0700

52. Setting a tone (Was: How much forward must the kickoff go?)
    • Setting a tone (Was: How much forward must the kickoff go?) (62 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:20:34 -0700

53. Soccer - - - It's own Worst Enemy???
    • Soccer - - - It's own Worst Enemy??? (106 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 21:21:24 -0700
    • Re: Soccer - - - It's own Worst Enemy??? (22 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 22:01:02 -0400

54. Surprise upgrade assessment
    • Surprise upgrade assessment (25 lines)
      From: John Ritter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 10:07:37 -0700
    • Re: Surprise upgrade assessment (54 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 13:36:05 -0400
    • Re: Surprise upgrade assessment (44 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 12:37:10 -0500
    • Re: Surprise upgrade assessment (36 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 10:58:29 -0700
    • Re: Surprise upgrade assessment (32 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 20:59:04 -0700
    • Re: Surprise upgrade assessment (41 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 18:06:22 -0700

55. Talking to players
    • Re: Talking to players (16 lines)
      From: Gingerich, Jonathan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:34:36 -0700

56. Talking to players.
    • Talking to players. (32 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 14:48:47 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (14 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 14:58:55 EDT
    • Re: Talking to players. (20 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 14:15:11 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (37 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 16:50:30 -0300
    • Re: Talking to players. (28 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 17:43:29 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (31 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 18:10:04 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (45 lines)
      From: Roy Swazey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 20:46:31 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (47 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 18:04:42 -0700
    • Re: Talking to players. (20 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 22:12:32 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (28 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 23:08:49 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (70 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 23:43:12 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (62 lines)
      From: Baldwincl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 01:51:14 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (18 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 09:22:29 CDT
    • Re: Talking to players. (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 11:08:24 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (39 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 14:42:22 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (36 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 08:56:29 -0300
    • Re: Talking to players. (28 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 09:18:14 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (41 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 18:22:28 -0700
    • Re: Talking to players. (77 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 22:24:48 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (31 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 23:18:41 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (48 lines)
      From: Bill Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:40:53 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (36 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 07:52:45 -0500
    • Re: Talking to players. (35 lines)
      From: Bob Hamlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:48:55 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (33 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:39:17 -0700
    • Re: Talking to players. (31 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:55:12 -0400
    • Re: Talking to players. (30 lines)
      From: Peter Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 09:44:02 -0700

57. THANK YOU, PETE GRATTON!
    • THANK YOU, PETE GRATTON! (119 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 23:51:34 -0400

58. The Letter F and the Number 2
    • The Letter F and the Number 2 (104 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 08:31:27 -0400

59. Tripping-DP
    • Tripping-DP (21 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:07:23 -0400
    • Re: Tripping-DP (22 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 15:27:19 -0400
    • Re: Tripping-DP (16 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 16:28:04 -0400

60. uefa cup
    • uefa cup (20 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 12:38:48 -0700
    • Re: uefa cup (22 lines)
      From: Gray's <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 14:51:42 -0500
    • Re: uefa cup (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 15:55:25 EDT
    • Re: uefa cup (27 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 13:44:41 -0700
    • Re: uefa cup (25 lines)
      From: Kamel Guerbaoui <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 12:51:50 -0700

61. We make our own troubles
    • We make our own troubles (49 lines)
      From: Hall, Jay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 07:49:58 -0600
    • Re: We make our own troubles (82 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 08:27:42 -0600
    • Re: We make our own troubles (95 lines)
      From: Hall, Jay <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 08:55:40 -0600

62. What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?)
    • Re: What % of player-refs are/were GKs? (was: Are players stupid?) (67 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 23:38:04 -0400

63. What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way in front of an attacker?
    • Re: What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way in front of an attacker? (56 lines)
      From: Peter S. Saly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 16:32:15 -0601

64. What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way infront of an attacker?
    • Re: What would you call on an attacker who goes prone way infront of an attacker? (69 lines)
      From: Scott Lawrence <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 8 May 2000 15:29:58 -0700

65. Which to choose.
    • Which to choose. (32 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 12:01:29 -0400
    • Re: Which to choose. (77 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 12:34:25 -0400

66. yet another offside issue...
    • yet another offside issue... (44 lines)
      From: Edward J. Branley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 20:14:50 -0500
    • Re: yet another offside issue... (21 lines)
      From: Richard Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 11:40:31 EDT