SOCREF-L Archives – July 2000, week 1

1. "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match
   • "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (62 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 23:49:58 PDT
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (42 lines)
     From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 08:35:23 -0400
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (114 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:39:17 -0500
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (21 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:05:54 -0700
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (33 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:11:34 -0500
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (117 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:55:17 -0400
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (151 lines)
     From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:25:47 -0400
   • Re: "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (63 lines)
     From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:12:17 -0500

2. "Fixing Your Feet" - unsolicited plug
   • "Fixing Your Feet" - unsolicited plug (24 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:43:06 -0500

3. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (15 lines)
     From: CHAD CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:00:30 -0700

4. Apology wasting bandwidth
   • Apology wasting bandwidth (50 lines)
     From: Richard B. Hull <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 11:00:02 -0400

5. AR position on deep-ball offside
   • AR position on deep-ball offside (36 lines)
     From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:52:57 EDT
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside (34 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:13:07 -0700

6. AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2
   • AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (22 lines)
     From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:57:31 EDT
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (26 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:17:17 -0700
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (40 lines)
     From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:34:12 -0400
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (13 lines)
     From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 14:11:54 EDT
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (23 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:28:32 -0700
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (21 lines)
     From: Stacy Lopez <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:34:29 -0500
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (15 lines)
     From: Bradley B Condo <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:53:32 -0600
   • Re: AR position on deep-ball offside - Sc. 2 (18 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 20:15:05 -0400

7. AR Signal at KftPM
   • Re: AR Signal at KftPM (19 lines)
     From: Ken Loomis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:40:26 -0400

8. AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal
   • AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (79 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:18:37 -0400
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (19 lines)
     From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:49:35 -0500
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (36 lines)
     From: Mendoza, Armando Mr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:15:27 -0500
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (18 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:58:14 -0400
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (27 lines)
     From: John Sites <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 07:35:42 -0500
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (35 lines)
     From: Don Hartnett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:31:47 EDT
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (24 lines)
     From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:08:03 -0500
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (42 lines)
     From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:27:41 -0300
   • Re: AR signal for the illegal jump that denies a PK goal (40 lines)
     From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:31:04 -0300

9. AR Signals
   • AR Signals (24 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 21:33:40 EDT
   • Re: AR Signals (39 lines)
     From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:04:23 +1000
   • Re: AR Signals (16 lines)
     From: Chuck Ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:34:54 -0400
   • Re: AR Signals (40 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:59:50 -0400
   • Re: AR Signals (35 lines)
     From: Jay Nichols <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:06:00 -0500
   • Re: AR Signals (21 lines)
     From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:23:24 +1000
   • Re: AR Signals (25 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 01:26:05 EDT
   • Re: AR Signals (12 lines)
     From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:31:53 EDT
   • Re: AR Signals (30 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:32:53 -0400
   • Re: AR Signals (28 lines)
     From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 22:06:45 -0400

10. AR Signals for GK encroachment on PK
    • Re: AR Signals for GK encroachment on PK (66 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 21:46:59 -0400
    • Re: AR Signals for GK encroachment on PK (93 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 23:55:50 -0400

11. Are we kidding ourselves??
    • Re: Are we kidding ourselves?? (44 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 01:11:48 EDT

12. attacker v. keeper: preventive refereeing
    • attacker v. keeper: preventive refereeing (46 lines)
      From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 11:46:07 -0500
    • Re: attacker v. keeper: preventive refereeing (29 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 12:15:51 -0400
    • Re: attacker v. keeper: preventive refereeing (23 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:19:59 -0000
    • Re: attacker v. keeper: preventive refereeing (27 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:48:07 -0400

13. Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match
    • Re: Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match (102 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:22:49 -0700

14. Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match was: Which Laws do we ignore?
    • Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match was: Which Laws do we ignore? (73 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:13:13 -0400
    • Re: Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match was: Which Laws do we ignore? (72 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:50:00 -0000

15. Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match was: Which Laws...
    • Re: Back to "Consistency" vs. getting a "feel" for this match was: Which Laws... (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:55:16 EDT

16. banning spectators at youth games
    • Re: banning spectators at youth games (39 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:37:35 PDT

17. Burn-MetroStars man-management
    • Burn-MetroStars man-management (57 lines)
      From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:56:55 -0400
    • Re: Burn-MetroStars man-management (35 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 22:49:24 EDT

18. Challenging goalkeepers in possession and new 6-second rule
    • Re: Challenging goalkeepers in possession and new 6-second rule (60 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 11:48:22 -0000

19. Challenging goalkeepers...final plea
    • Re: Challenging goalkeepers...final plea (114 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:23:58 -0700
    • Re: Challenging goalkeepers...final plea (38 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 14:18:47 -0400
    • Re: Challenging goalkeepers...final plea (52 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:57:05 -0700

20. Challenging the goalkeeper running with the ball
    • Re: Challenging the goalkeeper running with the ball (23 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 06:09:40 EDT
    • Re: Challenging the goalkeeper running with the ball (23 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:16:14 -0500
    • Re: Challenging the goalkeeper running with the ball (38 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:53:19 -0100

21. Challenging the Goalkeeper while running with the ball
    • Re: Challenging the Goalkeeper while running with the ball (64 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:05:40 PDT

22. Charging a goalkeeper who holds the ball
    • Charging a goalkeeper who holds the ball (48 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:31:12 -0400

23. Charging the goalkeeper
    • Charging the goalkeeper (22 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:52:56 EDT

24. Charging the goalkeeper- A reprint from the archives
    • Charging the goalkeeper- A reprint from the archives (47 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 21:18:56 EDT

25. Checking on European Soccer Tournaments
    • Checking on European Soccer Tournaments (24 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:30:11 -0400
    • Re: Checking on European Soccer Tournaments (24 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:57:44 EDT
    • Re: Checking on European Soccer Tournaments (44 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:06:17 -0400
    • Re: Checking on European Soccer Tournaments (54 lines)
      From: Chuck Ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:05:47 -0400

26. China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous ...
    • Re: China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous ... (29 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:38:50 EDT
    • Re: China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous ... (28 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 15:46:09 -0000
    • Re: China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous ... (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 07:19:10 EDT

27. China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous :o(
    • China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous :o( (47 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:36:07 -0400
    • Re: China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have been disastrous :o( (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:15:54 -0400

28. China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have beend
    • Re: China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have beend (16 lines)
      From: Robert Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:03:31 -0400

29. China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have beendisastrous :o(
    • Re: China vs Brasil women -- referee brain fart; could have beendisastrous :o( (18 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:27:54 -0400

30. China vs Brasil women's diving competition
    • China vs Brasil women's diving competition (28 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:57:38 -0400
    • Re: China vs Brasil women's diving competition (56 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:01:50 -0400
    • Re: China vs Brasil women's diving competition (37 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 08:54:17 -0700
    • Re: China vs Brasil women's diving competition (79 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:34:31 -0600
    • Re: China vs Brasil women's diving competition (32 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:13:46 -0700
    • Re: China vs Brasil women's diving competition (49 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 14:44:24 -0600

31. China vs Brazil
    • Re: China vs Brazil (47 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:31:20 -0400

32. coin toss
    • Re: coin toss (16 lines)
      From: Stacy Lopez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 20:31:28 -0500

33. Consistency
    • Consistency (528 lines)
      From: Dan C. Heldman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 21:58:20 -0400

34. EUFA, Euro 2000 and Portugal
    • EUFA, Euro 2000 and Portugal (78 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:03:09 -0400
    • Re: EUFA, Euro 2000 and Portugal (26 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 19:09:56 -0000
    • Re: EUFA, Euro 2000 and Portugal (16 lines)
      From: Michael Weitzenhoff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:22:24 EDT

35. Euro 2000
    • Euro 2000 (16 lines)
      From: Mike/Jay Kronenwetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:51:58 EDT
    • Euro 2000 (19 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 23:40:47 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000 (52 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 00:02:47 -0400
    • Euro 2000 (37 lines)
      From: Paul Condran <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:39:18 EDT
    • Re: Euro 2000 (19 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:52:47 EDT
    • Re: Euro 2000 (62 lines)
      From: Ben van Maaren <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 01:11:24 +0200
    • Re: Euro 2000 (52 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:57:56 -0700

36. Euro 2000 (NO SCORE, like I really care)
    • Re: Euro 2000 (NO SCORE, like I really care) (46 lines)
      From: Jon Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 12:43:34 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000 (NO SCORE, like I really care) (63 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:15:14 EDT
    • Re: Euro 2000 (NO SCORE, like I really care) (81 lines)
      From: O'Brien, Sean P. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 15:12:55 -0500
    • Re: Euro 2000 (NO SCORE, like I really care) (18 lines)
      From: Donald Friedel <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:16:57 -0500

37. Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end)
    • Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (84 lines)
      From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 01:27:49 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (66 lines)
      From: The Salganiks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:22:58 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (22 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:24:14 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (36 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:36:32 +1000
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (22 lines)
      From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:24:07 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (138 lines)
      From: Rich Fraser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:38:32 -0500
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (18 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:26:06 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (33 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:33:16 -0500
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (36 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:27:36 -0400
    • Re: Euro 2000: France-Italy (score included at end) (26 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:28:38 -0400

38. Euro2000 Italy-Holland: 10 cautions
    • Re: Euro2000 Italy-Holland: 10 cautions (46 lines)
      From: Marc Roberts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 18:06:47 -0700

39. Extinction alert!
    • Extinction alert! (40 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:58:22 -0400
    • Re: Extinction alert! (68 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:21:47 -0000
    • Re: Extinction alert! (26 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:30:48 EDT
    • Re: Extinction alert! (26 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:00:05 CDT

40. FIFA Badge Requirements
    • FIFA Badge Requirements (37 lines)
      From: mreeves <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:40:56 -0400
    • Re: FIFA Badge Requirements (106 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:15:12 +1000

41. Football this weekend
    • Re: Football this weekend (27 lines)
      From: Mic and Kirstin Platt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 23:47:27 -0700
    • Re: Football this weekend (30 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 12:25:57 -0700

42. GK wasting time?
    • GK wasting time? (33 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:58:12 -0400
    • Re: GK wasting time? (79 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:27:40 -0400

43. GK wasting time? - Warnings
    • Re: GK wasting time? - Warnings (14 lines)
      From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:32:41 EDT

44. gold cup -- tackles from hell
    • gold cup -- tackles from hell (48 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:35:21 -0400

45. Gold Cup Final air time is 9 pm on ESPN2
    • Gold Cup Final air time is 9 pm on ESPN2 (49 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:12:24 -0400

46. Gold Cup Tv coverage
    • Gold Cup Tv coverage (32 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:12:34 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup Tv coverage (35 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 20:50:11 -0100

47. Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref
    • Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (19 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 22:09:53 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (75 lines)
      From: Bradley Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:30:52 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:50:58 EDT
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:56:04 EDT
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (32 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:12:11 -0700
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:15:47 EDT
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (26 lines)
      From: David E. Ratka <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:42:04 -0500
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (37 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:43:50 -0700
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (55 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:06:01 -0300
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (24 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:15:28 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:56:42 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 00:10:30 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 00:25:44 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (70 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 08:47:43 -0400
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (26 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:20:09 EDT
    • Re: Gold Cup USA-Mexico ref (19 lines)
      From: Stacy Lopez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:56:07 -0500

48. Gone for a while
    • Gone for a while (15 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:42:07 -0700

49. Hoping This Never Happens To Me
    • Hoping This Never Happens To Me (55 lines)
      From: Rich Fraser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 19:50:26 -0500
    • Re: Hoping This Never Happens To Me (98 lines)
      From: Chad Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 20:12:54 -0700

50. How soccer changed
    • Re: How soccer changed (41 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 20:55:13 -0100

51. How soccer changed (was Challenging the keeper running w/ ball)
    • How soccer changed (was Challenging the keeper running w/ ball) (28 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:58:44 -0400
    • Re: How soccer changed (was Challenging the keeper running w/ ball) (32 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:08:55 -0400

52. It's that time again (still)
    • It's that time again (still) (22 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:42:16 CDT
    • Re: It's that time again (still) (30 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 16:31:20 -0500
    • Re: It's that time again (still) (39 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:50:55 -0700
    • Re: It's that time again (still) (20 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:47:23 EDT

53. Law 12 offenses.
    • Re: Law 12 offenses. (59 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:44:54 -0600

54. Make-Up calls [Re: US-Brazil women
    • Make-Up calls [Re: US-Brazil women (19 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 23:17:02 -0400
    • Re: Make-Up calls [Re: US-Brazil women (22 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 22:36:49 -0400

55. Make-up calls, and other mistakes
    • Re: Make-up calls, and other mistakes (49 lines)
      From: Mike/Jay Kronenwetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:22:36 EDT
    • Re: Make-up calls, and other mistakes (30 lines)
      From: Ted DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 15:55:02 -0400

56. Managing the scene of a serious injury
    • Managing the scene of a serious injury (95 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:54:44 -0400
    • Re: Managing the scene of a serious injury (44 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 20:58:41 +1000
    • Re: Managing the scene of a serious injury (58 lines)
      From: The Salganiks <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 07:46:45 -0400
    • Re: Managing the scene of a serious injury (15 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:21:11 -0400
    • Re: Managing the scene of a serious injury (30 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:01:39 -0500
    • Re: Managing the scene of a serious injury (70 lines)
      From: Al Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:15:29 EDT
    • Re: Managing the scene of a serious injury (102 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:01:51 -0400

57. managing walls & phantom calls
    • managing walls & phantom calls (29 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 12:29:00 -0500
    • Re: managing walls & phantom calls (69 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:43:35 -0700

58. Managing walls, etc, in Chicago-Colorado
    • Managing walls, etc, in Chicago-Colorado (25 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 14:28:13 -0400
    • Re: Managing walls, etc, in Chicago-Colorado (43 lines)
      From: Cris de la Torre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 17:20:08 -0700

59. Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage
    • Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (36 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 19:41:19 -0700
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (25 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:11:45 -0700
    • Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (15 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:12:55 -0400
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (35 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:44:06 -0700
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (39 lines)
      From: Frederick Rich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:43:57 -0400
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (71 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 08:46:46 -0700
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (19 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 11:57:13 -0500
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (28 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:25:20 EDT
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (29 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 10:31:35 -0700
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (28 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 20:45:38 -0000
    • Re: Mexico ref:profile in lack of courage (42 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:01:10 -0700

60. Mexico refs: AR flags
    • Re: Mexico refs: AR flags (16 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 20:59:43 EDT

61. offside
    • offside (21 lines)
      From: Stephen M Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:18:55 +1000
    • Re: offside (29 lines)
      From: Mike Goblet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 20:46:23 -0400
    • Re: offside (28 lines)
      From: Roy Swazey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 23:49:31 -0400
    • Re: offside (28 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:43:09 -0400

62. Old Geezers' Tournament
    • Old Geezers' Tournament (15 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 15:35:15 -0400
    • Re: Old Geezers' Tournament (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 20:29:59 EDT

63. Old Posts Revisited
    • Old Posts Revisited (27 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:23:01 EDT
    • Re: Old Posts Revisited (19 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:32:15 -0400

64. portugal v france
    • portugal v france (20 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 18:20:45 -0700
    • Re: portugal v france (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:44:42 -0400
    • Re: portugal v france (35 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 10:32:51 -0700

65. Poser.
    • Re: Poser. (33 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 16:51:52 -0400

66. Position of kick for offside
    • Position of kick for offside (35 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:18:39 -0400
    • Re: Position of kick for offside (80 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:54:40 -0400

67. quakes
    • quakes (13 lines)
      From: Scott Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:36:47 -0700
    • Re: quakes (39 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:47:51 -0700

68. Quiz question
    • Quiz question (34 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:14:32 -0400
    • Re: Quiz question (49 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:38:48 -0400
    • Re: Quiz question (55 lines)
      From: Mendoza, Armando Mr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:50:37 -0500
    • Re: Quiz question (55 lines)
      From: Stephen F. Montanino <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:59:41 EDT
    • Re: Quiz question (51 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:28:49 -0300

69. Refeeeing with and w/o assessor [was Re: Old Posts Revisited
    • Refeeeing with and w/o assessor [was Re: Old Posts Revisited (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:05:59 -0400
    • Re: Refeeeing with and w/o assessor [was Re: Old Posts Revisited (46 lines)
      From: Robert Williams <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 08:56:52 -0400

70. Referee Virginia Tovar in USA v Brazil: the 3 styles of officiating
    • Referee Virginia Tovar in USA v Brazil: the 3 styles of officiating (67 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 12:50:05 -0400
    • Re: Referee Virginia Tovar in USA v Brazil: the 3 styles of officiating (13 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:02:50 EDT
    • Re: Referee Virginia Tovar in USA v Brazil: the 3 styles of officiating (18 lines)
      From: CHAD CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 10:12:31 -0700

71. Referees Touching the Ball
    • Referees Touching the Ball (137 lines)
      From: Dan & Maureen Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 12:03:35 -0700

72. Size of the penalty mark (oops)
    • Size of the penalty mark (oops) (17 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:11:17 -0400

73. Size of the PK Mark
    • Re: Size of the PK Mark (53 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:47:37 -0400

74. Soccer on TV Saturday
    • Soccer on TV Saturday (78 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:49:03 -0400

75. Socref-l tee shirt
    • Socref-l tee shirt (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:44:25 -0400
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (12 lines)
      From: Brent Wanstreet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 22:59:52 EDT
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (20 lines)
      From: Gary Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:53:55 -0500
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:59:53 EDT
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (23 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:08:01 -0700
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (29 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 04:12:15 -0000
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (21 lines)
      From: Dave Weissig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 01:23:33 EDT
    • Re: Socref-l tee shirt (55 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:17:55 -0400

76. Steve's IFK option
    • Re: Steve's IFK option (19 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:09:46 EDT

77. Subject: Charging the goalkeeper
    • Subject: Charging the goalkeeper (23 lines)
      From: Mihail Faina <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:11:41 -0400

78. Subject: Re: Old Geezers' Tournament
    • Subject: Re: Old Geezers' Tournament (31 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:41:23 -0400

79. Subs during extra time
    • Subs during extra time (20 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:35:32 -0400

80. Team work: ill defined amongst the referee crew
    • Team work: ill defined amongst the referee crew (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:46:44 -0400
    • Re: Team work: ill defined amongst the referee crew (30 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:45:08 +1000
    • Re: Team work: ill defined amongst the referee crew (29 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:56:32 -0400
    • Re: Team work: ill defined amongst the referee crew (36 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 20:51:09 +1000
    • Re: Team work: ill defined amongst the referee crew (41 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 21:25:32 +1000

81. The AR's new role
    • The AR's new role (50 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 15:19:04 -0400

82. The other thing about 6s
    • The other thing about 6s (36 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:02:42 -0400

83. The penalty spot (and how many angels can dance on it)
    • The penalty spot (and how many angels can dance on it) (25 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 08:58:17 -0400

84. throw-in location
    • throw-in location (20 lines)
      From: Albert Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:00:03 EDT
    • Re: throw-in location (46 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 18:35:55 -0500

85. throw-in location, and keeping our focus on what's important.
    • Re: throw-in location, and keeping our focus on what's important. (43 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 20:58:38 -0400
    • Re: throw-in location, and keeping our focus on what's important. (91 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 09:41:29 -0400

86. Time outs
    • Time outs (22 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:18:02 -0600
    • Re: Time outs (37 lines)
      From: Bill Chapin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:25:21 -0500
    • Re: Time outs (66 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:01:07 -0400
    • Re: Time outs (72 lines)
      From: Michael Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 17:41:40 -0400

87. Time outs in high school soccer.
    • Re: Time outs in high school soccer. (41 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:55:04 -0400

88. two- did you see the play where...?
    • two- did you see the play where...? (19 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 13:48:01 -0700
    • Re: two- did you see the play where...? (31 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:18:24 -0400
    • Re: two- did you see the play where...? (46 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 11:39:35 -0700
    • Re: two- did you see the play where...? (28 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:17:59 -0600

89. Unsubscribe
    • Unsubscribe (22 lines)
      From: CHAD CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 08:13:32 -0700

90. Updated Intro Ref Course Materials
    • Re: Updated Intro Ref Course Materials (18 lines)
      From: Ron Magin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 07:40:27 -0400
    • Re: Updated Intro Ref Course Materials (51 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 10:03:27 -0400
    • Re: Updated Intro Ref Course Materials (30 lines)
      From: Doug Maddox <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:58:04 -0400

91. us game to be televised
    • us game to be televised (23 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:29:34 -0700
    • Re: us game to be televised (14 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 14:40:15 -0700
    • Re: us game to be televised (21 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 18:41:00 EDT

92. US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no...
    • US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (25 lines)
      From: David Hoerl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 21:16:28 -0400
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (31 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 23:02:41 -0400
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (32 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 16:02:29 -0000
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (45 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 12:51:57 -0400
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (21 lines)
      From: Fred <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 12:08:21 -0400
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (35 lines)
      From: William J. (Bill) Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 13:41:53 -0400
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (33 lines)
      From: Al Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 08:21:14 EDT
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (31 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 23:28:02 +1000
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (44 lines)
      From: Al Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 12:33:49 EDT
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (26 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 13:52:31 EDT
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (39 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 19:42:49 -0000
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (40 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 19:50:44 -0000
    • Re: US vs Canada - You take it, no you take it, no... (13 lines)
      From: s marquez <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 19:56:53 -0000

93. US-Brazil women
    • Re: US-Brazil women (19 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:12:38 EDT
    • Re: US-Brazil women (35 lines)
      From: ront1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 10:48:03 -0700

94. USA Cup attendees
    • Re: USA Cup attendees (51 lines)
      From: Richard B. Hull <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 10:40:59 -0400

95. Velcro
    • Velcro (18 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:40:43 -0400

96. Velcro-aid
    • Re: Velcro-aid (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:06:39 -0400
    • Re: Velcro-aid (12 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 16:49:30 -0400
    • Re: Velcro-aid (33 lines)
      From: Ronald Jalbert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 17:15:42 -0400

97. Virginia Tovar in the Women's Gold Cup final
    • Virginia Tovar in the Women's Gold Cup final (77 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 13:40:35 -0400

98. What should I have done
    • What should I have done (40 lines)
      From: Chad Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 13:11:12 -0700
    • Re: What should I have done (125 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 17:12:51 -0400
    • Re: What should I have done (92 lines)
      From: Alan Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:27:07 +1000
    • Re: What should I have done (100 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 09:24:34 -0000
    • Re: What should I have done (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 14:52:43 EDT
    • Re: What should I have done (105 lines)
      From: Craig Donnelly <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:11:05 -0700

99. What should I have done? PK ritual
    • Re: What should I have done? PK ritual (39 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:15:05 -0400
    • Re: What should I have done? PK ritual (13 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 21:28:40 -0400
    • Re: What should I have done? PK ritual (22 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:00:33 -0700
    • Re: What should I have done? PK ritual (28 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 10:17:45 -0400

100. Which Laws do we ignore?
     • Which Laws do we ignore? (33 lines)
       From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 09:11:41 -0400

101. Who Determines Added Time (was something else)
     • Re: Who Determines Added Time (was something else) (35 lines)
       From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:05:31 CDT

102. Why six seconds?
     • Why six seconds? (49 lines)
       From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2000 14:36:12 -0400
     • Why six seconds? (89 lines)
       From: Mihail Faina <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:17:11 -0400
     • Re: Why six seconds? (19 lines)
       From: Stacy Lopez <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:42:21 -0500
     • Re: Why six seconds? (57 lines)
       From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 20:17:59 -0400

103. Women's Gold Cup final
     • Re: Women's Gold Cup final (28 lines)
       From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:16:39 -0400
     • Re: Women's Gold Cup final (34 lines)
       From: marmiti <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 11:32:20 -0400
     • Re: Women's Gold Cup final (49 lines)
       From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 09:53:16 -0700
     • Re: Women's Gold Cup final (26 lines)
       From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2000 13:39:50 EDT

104. Women's Gold Cup Refereeing
     • Women's Gold Cup Refereeing (100 lines)
       From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 09:59:05 -0400
     • Re: Women's Gold Cup Refereeing (55 lines)
       From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 11:55:10 -0500

105. You Never Know who will Show Up
     • You Never Know who will Show Up (92 lines)
       From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 19:28:27 -0700

106. You Never Know who will Show UpII
     • Re: You Never Know who will Show UpII (49 lines)
       From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
       Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 10:29:42 -0400