SOCREF-L Archives – January 2001, week 5

1. A little more Between the Lines
   • A little more Between the Lines (121 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:36:31 -0500
   • Re: A little more Between the Lines (26 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:54:04 -0600
   • Re: A little more Between the Lines (31 lines)
     From: Jeffrey N. Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:11:14 -0500
   • Re: A little more Between the Lines (49 lines)
     From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:25:10 -0000
   • Re: A little more Between the Lines (20 lines)
     From: Gene Sours <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:53:30 -0800

2. A little more Between the Lines /confidence?
   • Re: A little more Between the Lines /confidence? (26 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:00:42 -0500
   • Re: A little more Between the Lines /confidence? (54 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:22:51 -0500

3. Adidas shirts
   • Re: Adidas shirts (20 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:13:31 -0500
   • Re: Adidas shirts (21 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:40:44 -0500

4. adidas shirts
   • adidas shirts (18 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:43:43 -0500
   • Re: adidas shirts (22 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:04:46 -0600
   • Re: adidas shirts (29 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:48:47 -0500
   • Re: adidas shirts (17 lines)
     From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:58:00 -0600

5. Adidas Shirts
   • Adidas Shirts (34 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:08:27 EST

6. adidas shirts
   • Re: adidas shirts (26 lines)
     From: Steven Ryono <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:10:52 -0800
   • Re: adidas shirts (39 lines)
     From: Steven Ryono <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:11:43 -0800

7. Adidas Uniforms
   • Adidas Uniforms (27 lines)
     From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:34:14 -0800

8. Changes in procedure for fourth officials
   • Changes in procedure for fourth officials (40 lines)
     From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:52:13 -0400

9. Chest Pass in USA v China
   • Re: Chest Pass in USA v China (22 lines)
     From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:08:41 EST
   • Re: Chest Pass in USA v China (46 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:19:28 -0500
   • Re: Chest Pass in USA v China (57 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:40:44 -0500
   • Re: Chest Pass in USA v China (61 lines)
     From: Chris Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:04:22 -0800

10. Daily humor - no soccer
    • Daily humor - no soccer (107 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:22:40 -0000

11. Dealing with divers and players who challenge divers
    • Re: Dealing with divers and players who challenge divers (126 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:37:53 -0500

12. Distinction between 'Foul' & 'Misconduct' (Was: Philosophical Q.)
    • Distinction between 'Foul' & 'Misconduct' (Was: Philosophical Q.) (30 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:12:45 -0500

13. Fouls and misconduct.
    • Fouls and misconduct. (45 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:54:03 -0500
    • Re: Fouls and misconduct. (60 lines)
      From: David Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:04:49 +1100

14. how to handle an annoying parent
    • how to handle an annoying parent (19 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:34:06 -0600
    • Re: how to handle an annoying parent (23 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:41:53 EST
    • Re: how to handle an annoying parent (28 lines)
      From: H. Brent Howatt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:18:51 -0800

15. Is this for real?
    • Re: Is this for real? (23 lines)
      From: David Bradshaw <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:18:14 +1100
    • Re: Is this for real? (67 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:16:14 -0500
    • Re: Is this for real? (28 lines)
      From: H. Brent Howatt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:01:25 -0800

16. Kicks From The Penalty Mark
    • Kicks From The Penalty Mark (111 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:21:05 -0800
    • Re: Kicks From The Penalty Mark (37 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:01:12 -0500
    • Re: Kicks From The Penalty Mark (168 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:04:54 -0500
    • Re: Kicks From The Penalty Mark (28 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:15:16 EST
    • Re: Kicks From The Penalty Mark (37 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:19:15 -0500

17. Kicks from the Penalty Mark
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (37 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:04:35 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (20 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:18:00 EST
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (42 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:16:14 -0800
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (26 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:30:57 EST
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (47 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:44:32 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:31:38 EST
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (38 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:56:21 -0800
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (35 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:25:53 -0600
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (18 lines)
      From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:10:46 +0000
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (28 lines)
      From: A Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:54:17 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (27 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:23:56 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:45:57 EST
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (41 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:12:09 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (57 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:28:59 -0500

18. Kicks from the Penalty Mark (Not soccer)
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark (Not soccer) (15 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:19:29 EST

19. Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:04:22 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (87 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:49:55 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (18 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:23:39 -0600
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (32 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:00:23 -0600
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (50 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:14:35 -0800
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (31 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:45:59 -0500
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:13:47 EST
    • Re: Kicks from the Penalty Mark/ but (44 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:48:15 -0600

20. Knee injury and reffing: Any chance?
    • Re: Knee injury and reffing: Any chance? (30 lines)
      From: Ivan Mann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:41:40 -0600
    • Re: Knee injury and reffing: Any chance? (52 lines)
      From: S. R. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:38:58 -0000

21. MLS and referees/fans
    • MLS and referees/fans (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:49:54 -0500
    • Re: MLS and referees/fans (25 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:59:19 EST

22. New Must Read REFEREE Book!!
    • New Must Read REFEREE Book!! (19 lines)
      From: Bob Wertz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:53:17 EST

23. New referee book: "For the Good of the Game"
    • New referee book: "For the Good of the Game" (48 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:01:51 -0500
    • Re: New referee book: "For the Good of the Game" (26 lines)
      From: Chris Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:27:17 -0800
    • Re: New referee book: "For the Good of the Game" (37 lines)
      From: A Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:58:57 -0500

24. NYTimes: Soccer Promotes Understanding Between Nations?
    • Re: NYTimes: Soccer Promotes Understanding Between Nations? (41 lines)
      From: Ralph Wolman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:48:50 -0500

25. On intentions and LOTG
    • On intentions and LOTG (47 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:06:27 -0500

26. Philosophical question
    • Re: Philosophical question (32 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:49:34 -0500
    • Re: Philosophical question (59 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:56:12 -0400
    • Re: Philosophical question (70 lines)
      From: Dan C. Heldman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:09:26 -0500

27. Referee Practices and Governmental Obligation - was the youth ref
    • Re: Referee Practices and Governmental Obligation - was the youth ref (29 lines)
      From: A Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:31:28 -0500
    • Re: Referee Practices and Governmental Obligation - was the youth ref (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:22:12 EST

28. Referee Practices and Governmental Obligation - was the youth ref thread by Mr. Joseph
    • Referee Practices and Governmental Obligation - was the youth ref thread by Mr. Joseph (30 lines)
      From: Chad Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:21:05 -0800

29. Referee web sites
    • Referee web sites (25 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:34:15 -0500

30. SOCREF-L Digest - 27 Jan 2001 to 28 Jan 2001 (#2001-29)
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 27 Jan 2001 to 28 Jan 2001 (#2001-29) (31 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:56:16 -0400
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 27 Jan 2001 to 28 Jan 2001 (#2001-29) (21 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:37:26 -0800
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 27 Jan 2001 to 28 Jan 2001 (#2001-29) (29 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:51:34 -0800
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 27 Jan 2001 to 28 Jan 2001 (#2001-29) (11 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:56:08 -0800

31. Southern hospitality
    • Southern hospitality (21 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:40:44 -0500

32. Under14 refs /
    • Re: Under14 refs / (23 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:02:14 -0600
    • Re: Under14 refs / (36 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:21:47 -0500
    • Re: Under14 refs / (36 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:22:56 -0800
    • Re: Under14 refs / (42 lines)
      From: Hajj Umar A. Hassan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:58:31 -0600
    • Re: Under14 refs / (37 lines)
      From: E.F.Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:34:36 -0000
    • Re: Under14 refs / (29 lines)
      From: Jeff Stern <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:06:54 -0600
    • Re: Under14 refs / (35 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:56:26 -0800
    • Re: Under14 refs / (43 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:07:17 -0500
    • Re: Under14 refs / (23 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:25:59 -0700
    • Re: Under14 refs / (29 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:02:30 -0700

33. Under14 refs // is it abuse of children?
    • Re: Under14 refs // is it abuse of children? (24 lines)
      From: Chad Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:58:44 -0800
    • Re: Under14 refs // is it abuse of children? (20 lines)
      From: Jonny Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:55:41 EST

34. USA-China (not handlling)
    • USA-China (not handlling) (28 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:40:44 -0500
    • Re: USA-China (not handlling) (19 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:50:24 -0800

35. USASA Referee workshop & USSF Assignor's Course, Feb 24, 2001
    • Re: USASA Referee workshop & USSF Assignor's Course, Feb 24, 2001 (52 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:49:15 -0500

36. What Would You Call?
    • What Would You Call? (24 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:27:38 -0700
    • Re: What Would You Call? (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:38:35 EST
    • Re: What Would You Call? (22 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:46:13 -0800
    • Re: What Would You Call? (37 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:43:55 -0700
    • Re: What Would You Call? (40 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:56:39 -0500
    • Re: What Would You Call? (31 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:01:17 -0700
    • Re: What Would You Call? (61 lines)
      From: Larry Schuster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:16:08 -0700
    • Re: What Would You Call? (42 lines)
      From: BUNTEN,STEVE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:43:41 -0700
    • Re: What Would You Call? (46 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:02:56 -0500

37. What's the call?
    • Re: What's the call? (35 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:30:15 -0500

38. When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman?
    • When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (30 lines)
      From: Peter Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:45:26 -0800
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (40 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:13:19 -0500
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (22 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:40:09 EST
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (81 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:43:21 -0500
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:11:20 EST
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (29 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:32:20 EST
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (40 lines)
      From: Gene Hirschman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:13:20 -0700
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (84 lines)
      From: Donald A. Friedel Jr. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:37:06 -0500
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (51 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:18:06 -0500
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:07:42 EST
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (57 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:29:18 -0500
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (62 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:09:20 -0500
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:36:22 EST
    • Re: When is a "certified AR" no longer just a Club Linesman? (54 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:31:46 -0500

39. Your call sets the tone
    • Your call sets the tone (46 lines)
      From: S. R. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:35:25 -0000
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (79 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:09:12 -0500
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (32 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:28:56 EST
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (50 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:02:19 -0600
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (52 lines)
      From: A Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:00:49 -0500
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (42 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:57:06 -0500
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:39:08 EST
    • Re: Your call sets the tone (67 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:02:14 -0600
    • Your call sets the tone (79 lines)
      From: S. R. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:39:36 -0000

40. your call sets the tone
    • your call sets the tone (48 lines)
      From: Sue & Alan Rothstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:34:37 -0500
    • Re: your call sets the tone (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:40:43 EST
    • Re: your call sets the tone (46 lines)
      From: A Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:50:31 -0500