SOCREF-L Archives – September 2001, week 3

1. "ASSISTANT" Referee
   • "ASSISTANT" Referee (88 lines)
     From: Alan & Sue Rothstein <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:00:20 -0400
   • Re: "ASSISTANT" Referee (35 lines)
     From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:06:11 +1000
   • Re: "ASSISTANT" Referee (18 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:06:44 EDT

2. "Dis-carding" refs (was JA's Reply on Kneeling ...)
   • Re: "Dis-carding" refs (was JA's Reply on Kneeling ...) (200 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:17:44 -0400

3. "Nitroglycerine" or "Valium"...
   • "Nitroglycerine" or "Valium"... (112 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 14:52:34 -0700
   • Re: "Nitroglycerine" or "Valium"... (295 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 17:21:54 -0400
   • Re: "Nitroglycerine" or "Valium"... (13 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:54:06 -0700

4. "This Dog Won't Hunt!"
   • Re: "This Dog Won't Hunt!" (150 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:35:43 -0700

5. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (145 lines)
     From: J.S. Walsh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:37:35 -0400
   • <No subject> (18 lines)
     From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:23:41 -0700

6. A study of referee registrations
   • A study of referee registrations (28 lines)
     From: Kirk Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:08:07 -0600
   • Re: A study of referee registrations (18 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:41:40 -0400
   • Re: A study of referee registrations (32 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:13:59 -0700

7. An idea to limit abuse
   • An idea to limit abuse (28 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:32:41 -0400

8. An Idea to Limit Abuse????
   • An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (102 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 15:04:50 EDT
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (24 lines)
     From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:38:23 -0700
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (154 lines)
     From: pitchsm <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:57:15 +1000
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (28 lines)
     From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 18:52:09 -0500
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (39 lines)
     From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 20:01:27 EDT
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (82 lines)
     From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:40:07 -0400
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (80 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:16:57 -0400
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (92 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:18:06 -0400
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (90 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:58:06 -0400
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (41 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 18:05:00 -0400
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (203 lines)
     From: Bill Sako <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:22:02 -0500
   • Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (40 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:26:20 -0400

9. ANOTHER Virus Alert!
   • ANOTHER Virus Alert! (58 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:09:27 -0400
   • Re: ANOTHER Virus Alert! (84 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:20:32 -0400
   • Re: ANOTHER Virus Alert! (77 lines)
     From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:31:15 -0500
   • Re: ANOTHER Virus Alert! (37 lines)
     From: Theodore DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:21:30 -0700
   • Re: ANOTHER Virus Alert! (16 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:09:13 -0400

10. card or no card
    • Re: card or no card (18 lines)
      From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 22:51:07 +0000
    • Re: card or no card (40 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:47:19 -0400
    • Re: card or no card (17 lines)
      From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 23:33:56 +0000

11. Chain saw coaches
    • Chain saw coaches (87 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:43:12 EDT

12. college rules
    • college rules (24 lines)
      From: Bill Sako <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:21:36 -0500
    • Re: college rules (48 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:33:49 -0700
    • Re: college rules (63 lines)
      From: David C. Bolsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:34:55 -0500

13. commemorative pins
    • Re: commemorative pins (36 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:58:57 -0700
    • Re: commemorative pins (49 lines)
      From: Mark Story <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:13:11 -0600
    • Re: commemorative pins (51 lines)
      From: D Greenough <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:22:19 -0400

14. commemorative pins -- web site URL
    • Re: commemorative pins -- web site URL (40 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:16:34 -0500

15. commerative pins
    • commerative pins (20 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:20:01 -0700
    • Re: commerative pins (23 lines)
      From: Greg L. Gaunt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:13:42 -0600

16. Comparison...
    • Comparison... (20 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:08:19 -0700
    • Re: Comparison... (38 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:34:18 -0400
    • Re: Comparison... (41 lines)
      From: Chris Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:57:34 -0700
    • Re: Comparison... (61 lines)
      From: ref254 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 12:09:55 -0700
    • Re: Comparison... (44 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:16:42 EDT

17. Dual System
    • Dual System (42 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:58:55 EDT

18. Exactly same 2 acts, but ...
    • Exactly same 2 acts, but ... (21 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:23:54 -0400

19. Express Yourself! : USA! NYC!USA!NYC!
    • Express Yourself! : USA! NYC!USA!NYC! (105 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:07:33 -0700

20. Free kick feinting
    • Free kick feinting (37 lines)
      From: Jim Chambers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:13:46 -0400
    • Re: Free kick feinting (14 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:21:37 EDT

21. Gold Jersey no longer Primary
    • Re: Gold Jersey no longer Primary (17 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:27:53 EDT

22. Has this ever happened to you?
    • Has this ever happened to you? (25 lines)
      From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:05:38 -0700
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (38 lines)
      From: Jeffrey N. Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:59:59 -0400
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (37 lines)
      From: Kara Honthumb Lange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:58:06 EDT
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (34 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:43:26 -0400
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (53 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 23:57:07 -0500
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (49 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:14:34 -0500
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (35 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:16:30 -0400
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (23 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:37:16 -0400
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (38 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:11:04 -0600
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (40 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:34:35 -0700
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (37 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:42:16 -0700
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (30 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:02:22 -0600
    • Re: Has this ever happened to you? (38 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:13:19 EDT

23. Having the last word
    • Having the last word (11 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:42:00 -0700

24. help on this one
    • help on this one (35 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:35:04 -0400
    • Re: help on this one (65 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:54:00 -0400
    • Re: help on this one (53 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:24:46 -0400
    • Re: help on this one (82 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:15:15 -0700
    • Re: help on this one (55 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:38:10 -0400

25. help on this one (dual partner's handling & restart call)
    • Re: help on this one (dual partner's handling & restart call) (46 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:15:49 -0400

26. Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers
    • Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (110 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 01:20:59 -0400
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (33 lines)
      From: E.F. Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 10:15:44 -0400
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (97 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:23:11 -0700
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (58 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:01:20 -0400
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (17 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:42:46 EDT
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (25 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:29:37 -0400
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers (24 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 03:01:08 EDT

27. Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers...Totally Off topic= Hit DELETE, if such is offensive.! & Mind Games.
    • Re: Historical Perspective: look into the past for future answers...Totally Off topic= Hit DELETE, if such is offensive.! & Mind Games. (32 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 00:26:51 -0700

28. Holy Moley....They are "gaming us"......from: "Soccer Coach-l"......We don't do that, do we????<g>
    • Holy Moley....They are "gaming us"......from: "Soccer Coach-l"......We don't do that, do we????<g> (23 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:28:07 -0700

29. Holy Moley....They are "gaming us"......from: "SoccerCoach-l"......We don't do that, do we????<g>
    • Re: Holy Moley....They are "gaming us"......from: "SoccerCoach-l"......We don't do that, do we????<g> (31 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:37:19 -0400

30. In-direct or penalty
    • In-direct or penalty (16 lines)
      From: Ali Nicoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:06:18 +0100
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (46 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:27:43 -0400
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (50 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 08:27:28 EDT
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (87 lines)
      From: Ali Nicoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:26:02 +0100
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (28 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:35:19 -0400
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (45 lines)
      From: Ali Nicoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:20:46 +0100
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (17 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:24:54 -0700
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (31 lines)
      From: Ali Nicoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:47:30 +0100
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (50 lines)
      From: Tomas Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 07:54:49 +0200
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (86 lines)
      From: Ali Nicoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:37:30 +0100
    • Re: In-direct or penalty (29 lines)
      From: Tomas Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:40:18 +0200

31. Indirect or penalty
    • Re: Indirect or penalty (30 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:34:36 -0400
    • Re: Indirect or penalty (53 lines)
      From: Ali Nicoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:26:50 +0100

32. Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age
    • Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (49 lines)
      From: Dale Holmen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:01:15 -0600
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (19 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 23:01:03 -0400
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (71 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:04:54 -0600
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (22 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 20:24:47 -0700
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (95 lines)
      From: Gary Bauerschmidt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:58:15 -0600
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (66 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:21:56 -0500
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (31 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:50:12 -0400
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:47:46 EDT
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (70 lines)
      From: David C. Bolsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 18:03:13 -0500
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (34 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:15:57 -0700
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (60 lines)
      From: les baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:14:20 -0400
    • Re: Is this illegal? Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (50 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:30:31 -0500

33. Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball
    • Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (110 lines)
      From: John Eyre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:04:45 -0700
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (126 lines)
      From: Jeffrey N. Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 17:37:09 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (37 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:52:27 EDT
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (48 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:44:10 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (90 lines)
      From: Stephen Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:47:43 +1000
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (141 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:15:01 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (158 lines)
      From: Stephen Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:43:05 +1000
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (46 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:49:46 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (75 lines)
      From: Stephen Pitchford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:11:49 +1000
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (106 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:55:44 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (29 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:03:24 -0700
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (52 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:34:56 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (33 lines)
      From: E.F. Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:45:52 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (49 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:58:39 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (116 lines)
      From: John Eyre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:52:17 -0700
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (21 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 16:29:51 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (159 lines)
      From: Heneghan, Joseph T (Joseph) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:03:47 -0500
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (30 lines)
      From: Tom Grawey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:13:43 EDT
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (223 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 06:38:06 -0700
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (65 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:45:02 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (40 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:37:43 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (110 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:29:11 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (138 lines)
      From: David Horn <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:17:42 -0500
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (20 lines)
      From: DeWys, Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:33:09 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (29 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:29:07 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (52 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 22:55:40 -0100
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (36 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:49:24 -0600
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (76 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 01:47:45 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 08:03:31 EDT
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (115 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 09:28:17 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (54 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:11:54 -0400
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball (30 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 21:53:44 -0100

34. Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball : The Thread that Refuses to Be Taken In Context.
    • Re: Jim Allen's Reply on Kneeling to Head the Ball : The Thread that Refuses to Be Taken In Context. (60 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:32:50 -0700

35. Just a thought (non-soccer)
    • Re: Just a thought (non-soccer) (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 04:30:30 GMT
    • Re: Just a thought (non-soccer) (17 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 22:02:14 -0700
    • Re: Just a thought (non-soccer) (49 lines)
      From: Scott Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 11:05:58 +1000
    • Re: Just a thought (non-soccer) (153 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:37:00 -0400
    • Re: Just a thought (non-soccer) (183 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:59:52 -0700

36. Listen to your children
    • Listen to your children (65 lines)
      From: Steve Levy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 07:40:26 -0700

37. Molding Facts into *shapes* (non-refereeing)
    • Molding Facts into *shapes* (non-refereeing) (132 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 00:21:20 -0400
    • Re: Molding Facts into *shapes* (non-refereeing) (8 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:45:30 -0400

38. msrc wants more $
    • msrc wants more $ (26 lines)
      From: ront1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:43:50 -0400
    • Re: msrc wants more $ (44 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:09:12 -0500
    • Re: msrc wants more $ (33 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 17:59:24 -0400

39. NISOA - black armbands
    • NISOA - black armbands (18 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:28:27 -0500
    • Re: NISOA - black armbands (34 lines)
      From: Theodore DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:46:26 -0700
    • Re: NISOA - black armbands (41 lines)
      From: Don Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 20:14:27 -0700

40. Non-US refs and the US tax code
    • Non-US refs and the US tax code (22 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:47:52 -0400
    • Re: Non-US refs and the US tax code (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:55:11 EDT

41. On refing
    • On refing (38 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:19:16 -0400

42. On the dual system
    • On the dual system (54 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:19:16 -0400

43. over 90% support less than 10% Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse????
    • over 90% support less than 10% Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (32 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:29:25 -0400
    • Re: over 90% support less than 10% Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:17:45 EDT
    • Re: over 90% support less than 10% Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (103 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:22:44 -0400
    • Re: over 90% support less than 10% Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 15:43:32 EDT
    • Re: over 90% support less than 10% Re: An Idea to Limit Abuse???? (51 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:35:23 -0400

44. Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing)
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (59 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 02:04:23 EDT
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (27 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:54:43 -0700
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (21 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:44:11 EDT
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (18 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:51:16 -0700
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (23 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:30:11 EDT
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (54 lines)
      From: E.F. Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:50:00 -0400
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (44 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 11:17:11 -0700
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (96 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 14:19:17 -0700
    • Re: Prejudice and racism (non-refereeing) (39 lines)
      From: E.F. Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 08:41:47 -0400

45. Quiz: Offside call?
    • Quiz: Offside call? (23 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 21:53:44 -0400
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? (34 lines)
      From: pitchsm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:09:04 +1000
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:22:13 -0700
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? (44 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 22:32:21 -0500
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? (46 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:40:46 -0400
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? (66 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:44:34 -0400

46. Quiz: Offside call? - a twist
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? - a twist (61 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 00:13:36 -0500
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? - a twist (67 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 05:40:38 -0400
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? - a twist (39 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:45:48 -0400
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? - a twist (82 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:17:57 -0400
    • Re: Quiz: Offside call? - a twist (54 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:35:32 -0400

47. Referee Associations
    • Re: Referee Associations (24 lines)
      From: ront1 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:52:37 -0400

48. referees should be given more freedom
    • referees should be given more freedom (50 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 20:51:52 -0400

49. Referre's and confidence
    • Referre's and confidence (31 lines)
      From: Robert D. Canavan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 15:59:36 -0500
    • Re: Referre's and confidence (51 lines)
      From: Roy Slocum <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 14:15:54 -0700
    • Re: Referre's and confidence (54 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 19:35:20 EDT
    • Re: Referre's and confidence (43 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:51:07 -0400

50. resetn
    • resetn (103 lines)
      From: Rick Troup <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 12:52:08 -0500

51. restart after non-foul (NF)
    • restart after non-foul (NF) (33 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:52:30 -0700
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (52 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 13:47:18 EDT
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (60 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:48:47 -0700
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (12 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 11:18:16 -0700
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (34 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 15:17:51 EDT
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (17 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:35:47 -0400
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (50 lines)
      From: Van Emden Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:03:50 -0700
    • Re: restart after non-foul (NF) (18 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:29:40 -0700

52. Returned mail: see transcript for details
    • Re: Returned mail: see transcript for details (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:35:57 -0700

53. Running up HS Scores
    • Running up HS Scores (21 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:01:00 EDT
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (39 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:18:11 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (83 lines)
      From: Tommy Hunt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 14:39:17 -0500
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (111 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 20:13:51 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (126 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 22:24:46 -0700
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (52 lines)
      From: Dewys, Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:42:52 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (103 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:18:49 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (36 lines)
      From: Peter Fletcher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 08:47:00 -0700
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (46 lines)
      From: H. Brent Howatt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 09:02:32 -0700
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (45 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:53:52 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (56 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:03:33 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (30 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:23:56 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (16 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 13:34:55 -0700
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (28 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 16:32:25 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (26 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:32:27 -0400
    • Re: Running up HS Scores (63 lines)
      From: Eric Emery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 19:34:33 -0700

54. Sadness for coaches, ref still missing in NYC
    • Re: Sadness for coaches, ref still missing in NYC (22 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 21:16:40 EDT

55. Saturday, Saturday. ( Sequel to that old hit: Monday, Monday")
    • Saturday, Saturday. ( Sequel to that old hit: Monday, Monday") (51 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:18:59 -0700

56. SOTG: the behavior
    • SOTG: the behavior (71 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 12:37:09 -0400
    • Re: SOTG: the behavior (25 lines)
      From: Jonny (Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 17:11:01 EDT

57. Sportpins web address
    • Sportpins web address (14 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:32:06 -0700

58. Subject: Just a thought (non-soccer)
    • Subject: Just a thought (non-soccer) (48 lines)
      From: Mike/Jay Kronenwetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 09:04:48 EDT
    • Re: Subject: Just a thought (non-soccer) (27 lines)
      From: E.F. Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 10:33:04 -0400

59. Subject: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday Show Disrespect!
    • Subject: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday Show Disrespect! (42 lines)
      From: Mike/Jay Kronenwetter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 07:22:12 EDT
    • Re: Subject: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday Show Disrespect! (75 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:41:39 -0500

60. Subject: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday ShowDisrespect!
    • Re: Subject: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday ShowDisrespect! (33 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 00:24:50 -0400

61. TALK: 91101... Forever More
    • TALK: 91101... Forever More (34 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:51:43 -0700

62. Thank you.
    • Thank you. (57 lines)
      From: Brian Fryd <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:13:36 EDT
    • Re: Thank you. (35 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 21:29:13 -0400

63. The Art of Writing History
    • The Art of Writing History (131 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 21:33:19 -0400
    • Re: The Art of Writing History (144 lines)
      From: Mike Hayford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 19:23:19 -0700

64. The Best coaching books for h.s. newbie coaches.
    • Re: The Best coaching books for h.s. newbie coaches. (89 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:40:54 -0700
    • Re: The Best coaching books for h.s. newbie coaches. (97 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 07:19:24 -0500

65. The flow of the game
    • The flow of the game (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:37:32 EDT
    • Re: The flow of the game (67 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 07:47:43 -0700

66. There is a Reason
    • There is a Reason (92 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 21:45:30 -0400
    • Re: There is a Reason (46 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 09:12:12 -0400

67. Timing of Justice
    • Timing of Justice (124 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 23:32:01 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (26 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 21:05:30 -0700
    • Re: Timing of Justice (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:59:57 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (184 lines)
      From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 10:46:43 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (69 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:29:35 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (26 lines)
      From: Brent Wanstreet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:08:15 EDT
    • Re: Timing of Justice (35 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:22:57 EDT
    • Re: Timing of Justice (10 lines)
      From: Brent Wanstreet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 14:28:53 EDT
    • Re: Timing of Justice (63 lines)
      From: steven ryono <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 12:50:38 -0700
    • Re: Timing of Justice (64 lines)
      From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 16:08:37 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (39 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 18:46:57 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (57 lines)
      From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 11:54:48 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (97 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 14:48:41 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (16 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:12:54 EDT
    • Re: Timing of Justice (116 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:51:07 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (115 lines)
      From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:27:41 -0400
    • Re: Timing of Justice (186 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:52:19 -0700

68. Turbans in High School
    • Turbans in High School (24 lines)
      From: Robert J. Dickover <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:42:53 -0400
    • Re: Turbans in High School (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 08:01:13 EDT
    • Re: Turbans in High School (53 lines)
      From: Theodore DeWys <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 09:44:36 -0700

69. Uncle Phil's Resurrection.
    • Re: Uncle Phil's Resurrection. (12 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 10:09:57 -0700

70. unfortunate call
    • unfortunate call (14 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 13:39:14 -0700
    • Re: unfortunate call (34 lines)
      From: Chuck Mason <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:01:56 -0600
    • Re: unfortunate call (24 lines)
      From: Chris Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:04:12 -0700
    • Re: unfortunate call (25 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 21:27:31 -0400

71. URL: English players warned to cut out dirty tactics
    • URL: English players warned to cut out dirty tactics (9 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:42:09 -0700

72. Where is "StopTerrorism-L" ??? (the Socref-l equivalent.)
    • Where is "StopTerrorism-L" ??? (the Socref-l equivalent.) (68 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 13:38:59 -0700

73. Why an Idiot? Why not a goose?
    • Why an Idiot? Why not a goose? (73 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 22:10:32 -0400
    • Re: Why an Idiot? Why not a goose? (55 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2001 22:27:35 -0400
    • Re: Why an Idiot? Why not a goose? (80 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 16:43:27 -0400
    • Re: Why an Idiot? Why not a goose? (40 lines)
      From: David Albany <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 22:40:42 -0400

74. WTC: Sadness for coaches, ref still missing in NYC
    • Re: WTC: Sadness for coaches, ref still missing in NYC (42 lines)
      From: Scott Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 00:13:47 +1000

75. Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday Show Disrespect!
    • Re: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday Show Disrespect! (62 lines)
      From: David C. Bolsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:21:02 -0500
    • Re: Youth Leagues playing on Saturday and Sunday Show Disrespect! (77 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 08:05:37 -0500

76. Youth refereeing at a young age
    • Youth refereeing at a young age (80 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 18:29:32 -0600
    • Re: Youth refereeing at a young age (37 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2001 22:17:16 -0400