SOCREF-L Archives – November 2001, week 4

1. Re: (30 lines)
   From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
   Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:10:29 -0800
2. "Match Referee" controversy in cricket
   • "Match Referee" controversy in cricket (23 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 16:45:11 -0800

3. "Take the Mloney and Run"....or: Run Now, Pay Later.
   • Re: "Take the Mloney and Run"....or: Run Now, Pay Later. (77 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:31:42 -0800

4. 2 v. 2.
   • Re: 2 v. 2. (35 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 22:19:19 -0800

5. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (17 lines)
     From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:42:36 +0000
   • <No subject> (37 lines)
     From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:20:22 -0700
   • <No subject> (22 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:08:19 -0800
   • <No subject> (66 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:00:33 -0200

6. A Bedtime Prayer
   • A Bedtime Prayer (56 lines)
     From: Scott Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 04:34:43 +1000

7. A Bedtime Prayer (Australia vs Uruguay result)
   • Re: A Bedtime Prayer (Australia vs Uruguay result) (91 lines)
     From: Scott Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 07:20:08 +1000

8. A few observations from the Capital Cup
   • A few observations from the Capital Cup (80 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 23:04:42 -0500
   • Re: A few observations from the Capital Cup (31 lines)
     From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 12:19:08 -0600
   • Re: A few observations from the Capital Cup (40 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 17:23:05 -0500

9. A Personal Best
   • A Personal Best (21 lines)
     From: Chuck Ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:44:17 -0500

10. Assignment Philosophy (was Cancelled or not cancelled)
    • Re: Assignment Philosophy (was Cancelled or not cancelled) (58 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:26:17 -0500
    • Re: Assignment Philosophy (was Cancelled or not cancelled) (81 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:23:15 EST

11. Book feedback
    • Book feedback (21 lines)
      From: Edward Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:30:20 -0600
    • Re: Book feedback (46 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 19:11:15 -0700
    • Re: Book feedback (76 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:57:08 -0500
    • Re: Book feedback (10 lines)
      From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:51:00 EST
    • Re: Book feedback (17 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:21:45 -0800
    • Book feedback (65 lines)
      From: Maurice Bizzarri <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:34:35 -0800
    • Re: Book feedback (27 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:52:35 EST

12. Book feedback Who is the author of the book, For the Good of The Game
    • Re: Book feedback Who is the author of the book, For the Good of The Game (99 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 07:05:18 -0500

13. Book feedback: For the Good of the Game
    • Book feedback: For the Good of the Game (68 lines)
      From: Van Emden Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:46:17 -0800

14. Cancelled or not cancelled
    • Cancelled or not cancelled (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:43:08 EST
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:55:22 EST
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (30 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:16:00 -0500
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:52:37 EST
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (30 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:00:02 -0800
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (51 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:31:45 -0800
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:12:37 EST
    • Re: Cancelled or not cancelled (21 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:25:19 EST

15. COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs
    • Re: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs (11 lines)
      From: Richard Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 20:10:57 EST
    • Re: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs (68 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 21:07:23 -0800

16. Email
    • Email (74 lines)
      From: D Greenough <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 16:39:51 -0500
    • Re: Email (31 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 20:59:35 -0800

17. FINAL COMPARISON, '98 and '01 USSF ATRs
    • Re: FINAL COMPARISON, '98 and '01 USSF ATRs (180 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 22:11:34 -0500
    • Re: FINAL COMPARISON, '98 and '01 USSF ATRs (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 19:36:38 -0800

18. Foul weather gear
    • Foul weather gear (44 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:16:35 -0500
    • Re: Foul weather gear (82 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:55:14 -0500
    • Re: Foul weather gear (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:49:30 -0500

19. FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks)
    • FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (23 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:43:30 -0800
    • Re: FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (32 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:00:21 -0700
    • Re: FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (28 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:46:08 -0800
    • Re: FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (46 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:34:12 -0700
    • Re: FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (53 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:12:18 -0800
    • Re: FW: FW: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (33 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:11:52 -0200

20. Getting to the Archives
    • Getting to the Archives (18 lines)
      From: Skip Wangbickler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:05:18 -0800

21. Giovanni's Diamond (part 1)
    • Giovanni's Diamond (part 1) (583 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:47:56 -0500

22. Giovanni's Diamond (part 1)(What got cut off)
    • Giovanni's Diamond (part 1)(What got cut off) (119 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:27:25 -0500

23. Giovanni's Diamond (part 2)
    • Giovanni's Diamond (part 2) (599 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:49:22 -0500

24. Giovanni's Diamond (part 2)(What got cut off)
    • Giovanni's Diamond (part 2)(What got cut off) (168 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 11:41:37 -0500

25. Good Advice from DA and Doug Smith (was Timing of Justice)
    • Good Advice from DA and Doug Smith (was Timing of Justice) (60 lines)
      From: Dan Cawley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 17:08:44 -0600

26. Grade 8 re-registration (had nothing to do with: To pay or not to pay)
    • Grade 8 re-registration (had nothing to do with: To pay or not to pay) (34 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:10:27 -0500

27. Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties.
    • Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (69 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:28:09 -0800
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (84 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:37:25 -0500
    • Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (58 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:08:03 -0800
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (91 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:44:11 -0500
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (41 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:14:28 -0800
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (30 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:49:59 EST
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (27 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:17:52 -0800
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (14 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:33:10 -0800

28. Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (aka: Achieving a game Fair to all.)
    • Re: Inherent Rights: #1: To Protect The Public's Civil Liberties. (aka: Achieving a game Fair to all.) (102 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:16:39 -0800

29. keeper dribbling back into PA
    • Re: keeper dribbling back into PA (17 lines)
      From: Ron Magin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:24:21 -0500

30. KFTPM (removing the 'keeper as kicker only)
    • Re: KFTPM (removing the 'keeper as kicker only) (59 lines)
      From: Billings, Loren A. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:41:59 +0000
    • Re: KFTPM (removing the 'keeper as kicker only) (71 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:48:43 -0500

31. KFTPM - Procedure
    • KFTPM - Procedure (16 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:28:19 -0500
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (30 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:55:17 -0500
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (29 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:44:01 -0500
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (59 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:05:09 -0800
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (82 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:32:40 -0500
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (31 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:19:17 -0700
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (129 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:04:47 -0800

32. KFTPM - Procedure -- WHEN to reduce numbers to equate (long)
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure -- WHEN to reduce numbers to equate (long) (379 lines)
      From: Cohen, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:14:05 -0800
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure -- WHEN to reduce numbers to equate (long) (214 lines)
      From: Cohen, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:55:52 -0800

33. Law 3 (was LoopHoles.....)
    • Law 3 (was LoopHoles.....) (20 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:42:37 -0500

34. Law Three Question
    • Law Three Question (22 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:58:35 -0500
    • Re: Law Three Question (52 lines)
      From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:21:52 -0600
    • Re: Law Three Question (34 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:33:37 -0800
    • Re: Law Three Question (75 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:08:25 -0800
    • Re: Law Three Question (64 lines)
      From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:42:09 -0600
    • Re: Law Three Question (80 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:50:51 -0500
    • Re: Law Three Question (113 lines)
      From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:04:42 -0600

35. Law Three Question & KFTPM
    • Re: Law Three Question & KFTPM (26 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:03:57 -0500

36. Law Three Question - ATR CHANGE - Missed by Michael
    • Law Three Question - ATR CHANGE - Missed by Michael (60 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:58:32 -0800

37. liability and goalposts -- was: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs
    • Re: liability and goalposts -- was: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs (67 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 10:52:10 -0500
    • Re: liability and goalposts -- was: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs (37 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 19:32:33 -0600
    • Re: liability and goalposts -- was: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs (74 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:12:40 -0800
    • Re: liability and goalposts -- was: COMPARISON OF 1998 and 2001 USSF ATRs (106 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 21:37:43 -0800

38. loophole? Nah.
    • loophole? Nah. (65 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 09:11:05 -0500

39. loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks)
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (36 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 10:42:54 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (22 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:53:49 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (19 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:55:15 EST
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (49 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:23:55 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (98 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:12:46 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (30 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:26:24 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (39 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:04:22 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (26 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:57:52 EST
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (51 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 21:27:41 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (18 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:13:06 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (24 lines)
      From: Mike Hayford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:34:07 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (21 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:01:42 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (64 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:44:10 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (24 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 10:42:57 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (18 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:01:02 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (37 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:00:56 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (63 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:50:42 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (83 lines)
      From: Geoff Blood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:33:23 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (16 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:07:33 -0800
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (48 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:02:22 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (62 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 21:22:37 -0200
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (72 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:40:03 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (57 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 00:47:54 -0500
    • Re: loophole? Nah. (re: Playing short, before Kicks) (47 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 06:54:40 -0700

40. LoopHoles.....
    • LoopHoles..... (213 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 17:59:53 -0800
    • Re: LoopHoles..... (35 lines)
      From: Thomas Coatoam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 23:19:13 EST
    • Re: LoopHoles..... (53 lines)
      From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:03:06 +1000
    • Re: LoopHoles..... (30 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:23:33 -0800

41. Loopholes.....
    • Re: Loopholes..... (57 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:09:26 -0800
    • Re: Loopholes..... (17 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 08:43:55 -0500

42. LoopHoles.....(Same as If The Whole Team Takes A Dive!)???
    • Re: LoopHoles.....(Same as If The Whole Team Takes A Dive!)??? (60 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 21:52:31 -0800

43. Modern English Usage
    • Modern English Usage (26 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:20:44 -0800
    • Re: Modern English Usage (44 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 11:39:04 -0800

44. New ATR - Redline Copy?
    • Re: New ATR - Redline Copy? (16 lines)
      From: Ron Magin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 07:03:14 -0500

45. New Rulings Still Needed!!! Ban Prayer Before Kickoffs!!!
    • New Rulings Still Needed!!! Ban Prayer Before Kickoffs!!! (41 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:00:29 -0800
    • Re: New Rulings Still Needed!!! Ban Prayer Before Kickoffs!!! (48 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 23:24:08 -0500

46. One Person Not to Argue With
    • One Person Not to Argue With (14 lines)
      From: Brad Condo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:05:54 -0700

47. plano labor day post mortem
    • plano labor day post mortem (85 lines)
      From: Rick Troup <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:23:12 -0600
    • Re: plano labor day post mortem (26 lines)
      From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:18:05 -0800

48. Players "on" the field.
    • Players "on" the field. (23 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:58:49 -0500
    • Re: Players "on" the field. (45 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 17:11:20 -0500
    • Players "on" the field. (40 lines)
      From: Billings, Loren A. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 22:43:17 +0000

49. Playing short loophole....HELP!
    • Playing short loophole....HELP! (17 lines)
      From: Gozo! <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:03:00 -0600

50. Positioning
    • Positioning (56 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:42:02 -0500

51. PREFACE to THE LAWS OF THE GAME.
    • PREFACE to THE LAWS OF THE GAME. (103 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:12:44 -0800

52. Preserving the Past
    • Preserving the Past (28 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:47:01 -0600
    • Re: Preserving the Past (30 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 17:24:41 -0500
    • Re: Preserving the Past (38 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 18:18:28 -0600

53. Rainbreaker waterproof jackets
    • Rainbreaker waterproof jackets (16 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:11:38 -0500
    • Re: Rainbreaker waterproof jackets (33 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:18:21 -0500
    • Re: Rainbreaker waterproof jackets (24 lines)
      From: Charles Treat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:14:41 -0800
    • Re: Rainbreaker waterproof jackets (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:33:54 EST

54. Rainbreaker waterproof jackets -- also available at OSI
    • Re: Rainbreaker waterproof jackets -- also available at OSI (32 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:18:49 -0600

55. Rainbreaker waterproof jackets, good for 'snoccer'?
    • Re: Rainbreaker waterproof jackets, good for 'snoccer'? (46 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 12:21:57 -0800

56. Referees: Work off that Turkey Dinner at the Rose Bowl
    • Referees: Work off that Turkey Dinner at the Rose Bowl (28 lines)
      From: Jeff Simmonds <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 03:10:08 -0800

57. Refs for the Australia Uruguay games
    • Refs for the Australia Uruguay games (23 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:52:35 -0500
    • Re: Refs for the Australia Uruguay games (40 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:02:07 -0500
    • Re: Refs for the Australia Uruguay games (73 lines)
      From: Scott Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:13:12 +1000

58. Rejected posting to [log in to unmask]
    • Re: Rejected posting to [log in to unmask] (26 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 21:08:16 -0800

59. SOCREF SUBJECTS
    • SOCREF SUBJECTS (33 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:18:20 -0500

60. SOCREF SUBJECTS: soccer on hiatus.??
    • Re: SOCREF SUBJECTS: soccer on hiatus.?? (64 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 07:56:10 -0800

61. Thanks for the new ATR
    • Thanks for the new ATR (24 lines)
      From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 08:14:55 -0500
    • Re: Thanks for the new ATR (36 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:17:03 -0800

62. The Difference between a Game and a Sport
    • The Difference between a Game and a Sport (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 21:10:13 -0600
    • Re: The Difference between a Game and a Sport (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:40:00 -0800
    • Re: The Difference between a Game and a Sport (44 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:38:57 -0700
    • Re: The Difference between a Game and a Sport (72 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 22:53:04 EST

63. The Goalposts as Gallows.= You are Dead Meat, if no Pre-game check of same.
    • The Goalposts as Gallows.= You are Dead Meat, if no Pre-game check of same. (84 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 22:07:20 -0800
    • Re: The Goalposts as Gallows.= You are Dead Meat, if no Pre-game check of same. (106 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 00:40:16 -0800

64. To pay or not to pay
    • To pay or not to pay (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:50:01 EST
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (41 lines)
      From: Gabriel G. Manrique <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 11:17:21 -0600
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (46 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:26:10 EST
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (44 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:42:46 -0500
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:10:43 EST
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (16 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 13:25:58 -0500
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (25 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 12:23:19 -0600
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:58:13 EST
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (37 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:12:25 -0800
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (47 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:09:55 -0500
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (32 lines)
      From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 19:19:23 EST
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (55 lines)
      From: James Keast, Canadian Referee and Assessor <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:42:41 -0400
    • Re: To pay or not to pay (104 lines)
      From: Scott Ferguson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 11:28:35 +1000

65. Tournament Help !!!
    • Tournament Help !!! (40 lines)
      From: CHAD L CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 22:27:15 -0600

66. Web-Based Assigning
    • Web-Based Assigning (84 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 09:07:40 -0800

67. Women's Symposium and Final Four Weekend
    • Re: Women's Symposium and Final Four Weekend (25 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 23:39:50 -0200

68. Words from Paul Tamberino
    • Words from Paul Tamberino (54 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 16:13:05 -0500