SOCREF-L Archives – December 2001, week 1

1. "What LOTG, Law 11 really means, when it says "Infringement".
   • "What LOTG, Law 11 really means, when it says "Infringement". (127 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:04:02 -0800

2. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (16 lines)
     From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:58:42 -0500
   • <No subject> (49 lines)
     From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:43:29 -0800

3. Advancing your grade
   • Advancing your grade (58 lines)
     From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:56:29 -0500
   • Re: Advancing your grade (19 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:26:07 EST
   • Re: Advancing your grade (84 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 23:33:46 -0500

4. AGM near northern Indiana
   • AGM near northern Indiana (23 lines)
     From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:42:17 -0500
   • Re: AGM near northern Indiana (24 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:22:30 -0500

5. An Exercise Analysis of Its Addictiveness.
   • Re: An Exercise Analysis of Its Addictiveness. (18 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:38:59 -0800

6. An Exercise Question
   • An Exercise Question (34 lines)
     From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:18:58 -0600
   • Re: An Exercise Question (64 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:22:58 -0500
   • Re: An Exercise Question (93 lines)
     From: Guy La Voie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:42:58 -0700
   • Re: An Exercise Question (44 lines)
     From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:08:04 -0600
   • Re: An Exercise Question (236 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:17:22 -0200

7. An Exercise Solution.
   • Re: An Exercise Solution. (58 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:05:43 -0800
   • Re: An Exercise Solution. (72 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:12:43 -0800

8. Answers about offside - most contain errors
   • Answers about offside - most contain errors (69 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:26:51 -0500
   • Re: Answers about offside - most contain errors (101 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:59:37 -0800
   • Re: Answers about offside - most contain errors (25 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:39:27 -0500
   • Re: Answers about offside - most contain errors (55 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:41:17 -0500

9. Book feedback
   • Re: Book feedback (27 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:04:33 -0200
   • Re: Book feedback (28 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 07:30:01 -0200

10. BUSB - Bizarre and Unsporting Behavior
    • BUSB - Bizarre and Unsporting Behavior (47 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:07:32 -0600
    • Re: BUSB - Bizarre and Unsporting Behavior (33 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 13:56:02 -0800
    • Re: BUSB - Bizarre and Unsporting Behavior (19 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 01:01:39 -0500

11. Child Molestation.
    • Re: Child Molestation. (147 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:59:13 -0800

12. Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside)
    • Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside) (34 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:27:42 -0500
    • Re: Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside) (65 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 07:15:00 -0600

13. Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer" aboutoffside)
    • Re: Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer" aboutoffside) (82 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 15:31:35 -0500
    • Re: Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer" aboutoffside) (24 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:46:45 -0500

14. Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer"aboutoffside)
    • Re: Commentator drivel (was Relative veteran "wrong answer"aboutoffside) (38 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:18:47 -0500

15. Contact Needed : Sunbowl in Tampa
    • Contact Needed : Sunbowl in Tampa (21 lines)
      From: Mike Jackson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:42:38 -0600
    • Re: Contact Needed : Sunbowl in Tampa (35 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:03:38 -0500

16. contrived prerogatives...or "judicious application of tools".
    • contrived prerogatives...or "judicious application of tools". (123 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:05:51 -0800

17. Corner Kick or Throw in?
    • Corner Kick or Throw in? (42 lines)
      From: CHAD L CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 22:34:54 -0600
    • Re: Corner Kick or Throw in? (57 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:48:02 -0800
    • Re: Corner Kick or Throw in? (48 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:40:59 -0600
    • Re: Corner Kick or Throw in? (46 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:55:18 -0600

18. DOES TLOG Prohibit This? (was KFTPM -- procedure)
    • Re: DOES TLOG Prohibit This? (was KFTPM -- procedure) (25 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:33:59 -0500
    • Re: DOES TLOG Prohibit This? (was KFTPM -- procedure) (40 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 14:39:50 -0600

19. DP v. "Kicking"
    • Re: DP v. "Kicking" (42 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:25:34 -0500

20. Focus! It is a long shot (from a videographer's point of view)
    • Re: Focus! It is a long shot (from a videographer's point of view) (102 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 23:20:10 -0200
    • Re: Focus! It is a long shot (from a videographer's point of view) (142 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 21:01:41 -0800
    • Re: Focus! It is a long shot (from a videographer's point of view) (178 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 11:25:29 -0500

21. Focus, focus, focus
    • Focus, focus, focus (43 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 23:21:29 EDT
    • Re: Focus, focus, focus (50 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 21:13:08 -0800
    • Re: Focus, focus, focus (43 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 17:10:34 -0800
    • Re: Focus, focus, focus (18 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 21:47:46 -0500
    • Re: Focus, focus, focus (31 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 19:23:24 -0800
    • Re: Focus, focus, focus (70 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:00:51 -0800
    • Re: Focus, focus, focus (54 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:25:36 -0800

22. FW: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside, ..: The Difference Between "Infringement" and "Infraction"
    • FW: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside, ..: The Difference Between "Infringement" and "Infraction" (161 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:15:25 -0800
    • Re: FW: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside, ..: The Difference Between "Infringement" and "Infraction" (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:49:20 -0800

23. Gaining an advantage and thus offside
    • Gaining an advantage and thus offside (65 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:33:43 -0500

24. Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Rant not Flame.
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Rant not Flame. (53 lines)
      From: John Eyre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:11:05 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Rant not Flame. (81 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 21:36:44 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Rant not Flame. (84 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:10:54 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Rant not Flame. (83 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 06:02:07 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Rant not Flame. (54 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:16:40 -0600

25. Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (71 lines)
      From: David Hoerl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:17:45 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (27 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:03:24 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (114 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:54:43 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (62 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:13:45 -0600
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (85 lines)
      From: David Hoerl <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:17:42 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (26 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:56:07 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (66 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 16:20:48 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (38 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:28:20 -0600
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (29 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 21:09:03 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (32 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 03:02:12 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (22 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:30:03 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (21 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:49:47 -0500
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (26 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:52:46 EST
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (21 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:51:48 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (58 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 12:44:47 -0800
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (23 lines)
      From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:04:29 -0600
    • Re: Gaining an advantage and thus offside - Second Example (43 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:39:16 -0500

26. Game Tracking
    • Re: Game Tracking (47 lines)
      From: Bates Family <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 06:29:36 -0800
    • Re: Game Tracking (70 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:04:39 -0800
    • Re: Game Tracking (34 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:27:07 -0800

27. Game Tracking -- and a plug for using a PDA
    • Re: Game Tracking -- and a plug for using a PDA (77 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 10:54:46 -0600
    • Re: Game Tracking -- and a plug for using a PDA (87 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 13:44:09 -0800

28. Goalkeeper sentenced to prison...
    • Re: Goalkeeper sentenced to prison... (35 lines)
      From: Tomas Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 10:24:37 +0100
    • Re: Goalkeeper sentenced to prison... (28 lines)
      From: Lucas Joyner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 21:27:58 +1000
    • Re: Goalkeeper sentenced to prison... (37 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:21:58 EST
    • Re: Goalkeeper sentenced to prison... (54 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:23:12 EST
    • Re: Goalkeeper sentenced to prison... (31 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:31:02 -0500
    • Re: Goalkeeper sentenced to prison... (51 lines)
      From: Tomas Nilsson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:43:22 +0100

29. Help wanted
    • Help wanted (74 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 07:39:42 EST

30. High Kick
    • Re: High Kick (26 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:32:02 -0800

31. Interesting Statistic
    • Interesting Statistic (26 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:53:43 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (34 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:10:08 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (49 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:12:53 EST
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (25 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 10:15:31 EST
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (36 lines)
      From: Gabriel G. Manrique <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:02:52 -0600
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (51 lines)
      From: DeWys, Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 12:20:22 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (79 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 19:27:25 -0400
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (98 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 19:38:49 -0400
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (56 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:28:58 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (120 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 07:59:55 -0500
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (45 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 05:48:32 -0800
    • Re: Interesting Statistic (95 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 22:29:41 -0500

32. Is there no referee in that game?
    • Re: Is there no referee in that game? (46 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 22:32:41 -0200
    • Re: Is there no referee in that game? (59 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 07:32:59 -0200

33. KFTM discussion. . . ITOOTR, SOTG, and other contrived prerogatives
    • Re: KFTM discussion. . . ITOOTR, SOTG, and other contrived prerogatives (25 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 00:05:01 -0700
    • Re: KFTM discussion. . . ITOOTR, SOTG, and other contrived prerogatives (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 23:55:03 -0800

34. KFTPM - Procedure
    • Re: KFTPM - Procedure (56 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 10:20:24 -0500

35. KFTPM -- procedure
    • Re: KFTPM -- procedure (52 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:44:01 -0600

36. Kyle Borne virus
    • Kyle Borne virus (36 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 13:07:00 EST

37. Kyle Borne?
    • Kyle Borne? (26 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:59:39 -0800
    • Re: Kyle Borne? (38 lines)
      From: Greg L. Gaunt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 05:16:03 -0700
    • Re: Kyle Borne? (14 lines)
      From: Brian Fryd <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:32:04 EST
    • Re: Kyle Borne? (38 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:15:25 -0600
    • Re: Kyle Borne? (50 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:30:48 -0600

38. Kyle Borne? - INFECTED FILE!
    • Re: Kyle Borne? - INFECTED FILE! (55 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:17:48 -0500
    • Re: Kyle Borne? - INFECTED FILE! (22 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:17:41 EST
    • Re: Kyle Borne? - INFECTED FILE! (20 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:34:03 -0500

39. Kyle Borne?: w32.Badtrans
    • Re: Kyle Borne?: w32.Badtrans (42 lines)
      From: DeWys, Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:59:39 -0500
    • Re: Kyle Borne?: w32.Badtrans (21 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:29:37 -0500
    • Re: Kyle Borne?: w32.Badtrans (16 lines)
      From: larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:08:42 -0800

40. Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ??
    • Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ?? (67 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 14:45:17 -0600
    • Re: Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ?? (94 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:00:10 -0800
    • Re: Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ?? (48 lines)
      From: Cohen, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:26:05 -0800
    • Re: Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ?? (146 lines)
      From: les baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 19:59:04 -0500

41. Mark Oliver
    • Mark Oliver (29 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 09:47:42 -0500

42. More Slovacek Stormcase
    • Re: More Slovacek Stormcase (45 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 12:06:13 -0500
    • Re: More Slovacek Stormcase (21 lines)
      From: Thomas Coatoam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:16:46 EST
    • Re: More Slovacek Stormcase (42 lines)
      From: Guy La Voie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:32:52 -0700
    • Re: More Slovacek Stormcase (49 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:49:23 -0500

43. More Storm Showcase
    • More Storm Showcase (62 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:36:08 EST
    • Re: More Storm Showcase (94 lines)
      From: Gary Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 10:53:59 -0600

44. Need Recommendations for a YOU MAKE THE CALL Video
    • Need Recommendations for a YOU MAKE THE CALL Video (28 lines)
      From: Loring Fiske-Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 20:22:50 -0800
    • Re: Need Recommendations for a YOU MAKE THE CALL Video (22 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:04:17 -0500

45. NEW INTERNET VIRUS12/4/01
    • NEW INTERNET VIRUS12/4/01 (23 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:46:27 -0500

46. Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question
    • Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question (57 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 08:00:48 -0500

47. Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question ...
    • Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question ... (50 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:15:43 -0600
    • Re: Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question ... (77 lines)
      From: Cohen, Joseph <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:25:19 -0800
    • Re: Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question ... (38 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 15:43:04 -0600
    • Re: Not strictly LOTG but working through a rules interpretation question ... (73 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:00:52 -0500

48. Notice
    • Notice (19 lines)
      From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 18:53:08 -0500
    • Re: Notice (33 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:09:35 -0800

49. On "WeekEnd Edition", on NPR, today.
    • On "WeekEnd Edition", on NPR, today. (337 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:04:44 -0800

50. Peanuts (was: The Difference between a Game and a Sport)
    • Re: Peanuts (was: The Difference between a Game and a Sport) (31 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:28:11 -0600
    • Re: Peanuts (was: The Difference between a Game and a Sport) (41 lines)
      From: Patrick Donohoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:03:48 -0500

51. Playing on the ground
    • Playing on the ground (42 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:37:15 -0500
    • Re: Playing on the ground (52 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:09:03 EST

52. Position papers (was: Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ??)
    • Position papers (was: Law 12 and Restarts (for spitting and VC) ??) (26 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:40:24 -0500

53. refereeworld.com (commercial plug)
    • Re: refereeworld.com (commercial plug) (9 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 08:52:31 -0500
    • Re: refereeworld.com (commercial plug) (25 lines)
      From: Aaron Propes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 15:14:55 -0600

54. Relative beginner question about offside
    • Relative beginner question about offside (37 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 20:49:34 -0800
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (49 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 21:12:35 -0800
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (24 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 00:48:39 -0500
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (97 lines)
      From: Hugh Griffis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 00:00:56 -0600
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (128 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:50:18 -0800
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (29 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:35:59 -0600
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (59 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 06:17:21 -0800
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (25 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:37:22 -0500
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (56 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:41:28 -0500
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (77 lines)
      From: Hugh Griffis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:10:31 -0600
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (20 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:55:24 -0500
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (31 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:18:54 -0600
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (19 lines)
      From: Dave Fredlund <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:15:40 EST
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (30 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:34:26 -0500
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (46 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:29:01 -0600
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (46 lines)
      From: larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:40:55 -0800
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (15 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:48:51 -0500
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (26 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:10:43 -0800
    • Re: Relative beginner question about offside (37 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 21:37:05 -0800

55. Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside
    • Re: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside (103 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:15:56 -0800
    • Re: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside (25 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:36:02 -0800
    • Re: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside (28 lines)
      From: Donnelly, Craig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:16:11 -0800
    • Re: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside (37 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:50:22 -0800
    • Re: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside (49 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:23:33 -0500
    • Re: Relative veteran "wrong answer" about offside (17 lines)
      From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:26:41 -0600

56. Restart
    • Restart (11 lines)
      From: Richard Bernstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:59:14 -0500
    • Re: Restart (29 lines)
      From: Karl Arps <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:23:34 -0600
    • Re: Restart (29 lines)
      From: Hugh Griffis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:26:13 -0600
    • Re: Restart (30 lines)
      From: Rush, Michael J <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 12:58:46 -0600
    • Re: Restart (19 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:08:46 -0500
    • Re: Restart (29 lines)
      From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 15:46:19 -0600

57. Schwan's USA CUP '02 - Youth Soccer Tournament
    • Schwan's USA CUP '02 - Youth Soccer Tournament (20 lines)
      From: Michael F. Rolfes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 21:26:08 EST

58. Signalling during KFTPM
    • Signalling during KFTPM (26 lines)
      From: Follick Family <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 11:23:59 -0800

59. Soccer History
    • Soccer History (41 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 15:39:42 -0200
    • Re: Soccer History (66 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:58:19 -0800
    • Re: Soccer History (123 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 21:23:12 -0800

60. Stocking stuffers
    • Stocking stuffers (14 lines)
      From: Larry Normansell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:40:20 -0500
    • Re: Stocking stuffers (37 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:44:50 EST
    • Re: Stocking stuffers (21 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:23:55 -0500

61. Storm Showcase Reprise
    • Storm Showcase Reprise (49 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 18:04:00 EST
    • Re: Storm Showcase Reprise (24 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 09:04:12 -0500
    • Re: Storm Showcase Reprise (56 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 23:14:08 -0500

62. super team mechanics
    • super team mechanics (14 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 14:42:03 EST
    • Re: super team mechanics (33 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 09:09:42 EST
    • Re: super team mechanics (10 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 10:17:31 -0500
    • Re: super team mechanics (33 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 07:55:31 -0800
    • Re: super team mechanics (44 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 11:32:51 EST

63. SuperTeam mechanics (was re: Storm showcase)
    • SuperTeam mechanics (was re: Storm showcase) (25 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 08:42:10 -0800
    • Re: SuperTeam mechanics (was re: Storm showcase) (37 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2001 11:56:40 -0600

64. Swear on What?
    • Re: Swear on What? (37 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:14:02 -0800

65. T-Shirts for the Christmas list?
    • T-Shirts for the Christmas list? (11 lines)
      From: Rich Wise <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 16:51:55 -0500

66. TALK: Arena happy with draw
    • TALK: Arena happy with draw (105 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:12:24 -0800
    • Re: TALK: Arena happy with draw (40 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 17:45:40 -0500

67. TALK: KEN ASTON MEMORIAL PROJECT
    • TALK: KEN ASTON MEMORIAL PROJECT (101 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 02:26:21 -0800

68. The Winner of the NCAA men's soccer final is.............
    • The Winner of the NCAA men's soccer final is............. (34 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 10:29:42 -0800

69. USSF Advice to Referees - 2001
    • USSF Advice to Referees - 2001 (19 lines)
      From: Jack Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:24:29 -0800
    • Re: USSF Advice to Referees - 2001 (32 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 15:45:12 -0600

70. virus info ??
    • virus info ?? (12 lines)
      From: ken b <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 07:30:49 -0500
    • Re: virus info ?? (19 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 08:04:55 -0500

71. Visiting Lake Charles
    • Visiting Lake Charles (21 lines)
      From: Greg L. Gaunt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 04:59:26 -0700
    • Visiting Lake Charles (19 lines)
      From: Greg L. Gaunt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2001 05:08:03 -0700

72. Whazzup in San Fran?
    • Whazzup in San Fran? (139 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 16:58:58 -0800
    • Re: Whazzup in San Fran? (153 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 20:51:41 -0800