SOCREF-L Archives – January 2002, week 1

1. "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask"
   • "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (48 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:50:54 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (33 lines)
     From: pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:03:39 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (37 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 15:37:26 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (55 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 16:23:25 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (51 lines)
     From: pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 21:51:11 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (62 lines)
     From: pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 22:07:27 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (62 lines)
     From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:54:18 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (47 lines)
     From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:28:55 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (56 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:26:48 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (71 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:30:29 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (86 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:31:54 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (92 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:00:57 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (39 lines)
     From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:55:22 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (35 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:57:38 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (56 lines)
     From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:33:07 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (40 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:52:47 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (104 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:59:53 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (76 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:35:36 -0800
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (88 lines)
     From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:51:41 -0700
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (131 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:58:20 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (67 lines)
     From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:25:58 -0700
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately, w/o having to ask" (66 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:32:14 -0800

2. "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately,w/o having to ask"
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately,w/o having to ask" (63 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:35:04 -0500
   • Re: "Give 10 yards on FKs immediately,w/o having to ask" (31 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:00:26 -0800

3. "The Martians Have Landed" Situations
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations (26 lines)
     From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:58:55 -0700
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations (28 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:40:25 -0500

4. "The Martians Have Landed" Situations.
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (73 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:27:05 -0800
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (88 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:14:38 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (118 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:31:20 -0800
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (64 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:51:07 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (20 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:59:23 -0800
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (34 lines)
     From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:01:55 -0600
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (81 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:30:35 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (21 lines)
     From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:52:07 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (17 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:03:35 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (28 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:19:44 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (35 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 00:42:47 -0500
   • Re: "The Martians Have Landed" Situations. (57 lines)
     From: Craig J. Nelsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:04:03 -0600

5. "The San Franciscans (formerly Martians) Have Landed" Situations
   • Re: "The San Franciscans (formerly Martians) Have Landed" Situations (52 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:29:14 -0800
   • Re: "The San Franciscans (formerly Martians) Have Landed" Situations (14 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:19:25 EST

6. 9:30 a.m. at the NSCAA convention, Sat., Jan. 19 -- room CC103
   • 9:30 a.m. at the NSCAA convention, Sat., Jan. 19 -- room CC103 (44 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:59:34 EST

7. a new situation
   • a new situation (28 lines)
     From: Glenn Schwartzberg <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:36:02 -0800
   • Re: a new situation (45 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:48:08 EST
   • Re: a new situation (60 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:47:49 -0500
   • Re: a new situation (27 lines)
     From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:52:25 EST
   • Re: a new situation (24 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:16:08 -0800
   • Re: a new situation (82 lines)
     From: Hugh Griffis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:50:40 -0600
   • Re: a new situation (79 lines)
     From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:43:22 -0600
   • Re: a new situation (38 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:53:41 -0800
   • Re: a new situation (31 lines)
     From: Charles Treat <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:15:36 +0000
   • Re: a new situation (55 lines)
     From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:54:49 EST
   • Re: a new situation (65 lines)
     From: Kevin Newmeyer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:15:35 +0000
   • Re: a new situation (27 lines)
     From: Donnelly, Craig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:32:14 -0800
   • Re: a new situation (60 lines)
     From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:55:14 -0400

8. AR's switch ends
   • Re: AR's switch ends (31 lines)
     From: Michael McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:03:56 -0500
   • Re: AR's switch ends (52 lines)
     From: Jason P Currie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:11:06 -0500
   • Re: AR's switch ends (68 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:38:17 -0500
   • Re: AR's switch ends (21 lines)
     From: Donnelly, Craig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:55:51 -0800
   • Re: AR's switch ends (101 lines)
     From: Hugh Griffis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:58:20 -0600
   • Re: AR's switch ends (56 lines)
     From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:45:40 -0700

9. Brian Hall named to referee at World Cup
   • Brian Hall named to referee at World Cup (15 lines)
     From: David Drexler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 13:52:04 -0800
   • Re: Brian Hall named to referee at World Cup (20 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:50:33 EST
   • Re: Brian Hall named to referee at World Cup (29 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:31:15 -0500

10. Brodcasting rights
    • Brodcasting rights (12 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:42:42 EST
    • Re: Brodcasting rights (16 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 13:01:57 -0800
    • Re: Brodcasting rights (24 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:09:54 EST
    • Re: Brodcasting rights (23 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:11:29 EST

11. Canadian to the World CUP too
    • Canadian to the World CUP too (17 lines)
      From: Dennis Petrelli <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:53:11 -0600

12. Comments on the English Premier League
    • Comments on the English Premier League (43 lines)
      From: Tom Krajewski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:55:50 EST
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (73 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:24:48 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (108 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:40:10 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (31 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:42:29 -0800
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (45 lines)
      From: Charles Treat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:42:57 +0000
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (79 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:42:04 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (32 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 13:59:51 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (22 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:20:41 -0800
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (19 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:38:33 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (39 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:55:02 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (56 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:21:34 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (24 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 20:33:02 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the English Premier League (32 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:45:23 -0800

13. Comments on the EPL --- double the fun
    • Re: Comments on the EPL --- double the fun (37 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 12:18:15 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the EPL --- double the fun (13 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:37:02 -0800
    • Re: Comments on the EPL --- double the fun (27 lines)
      From: Referees <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:41:17 +1100
    • Re: Comments on the EPL --- double the fun (25 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:01:30 -0500
    • Re: Comments on the EPL --- double the fun (14 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:29:55 -0800

14. Contretemps at a GK.
    • Contretemps at a GK. (22 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:35:50 -0500

15. Dangerous play
    • Re: Dangerous play (37 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:40:02 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous play (50 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:17:18 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous play (95 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:42:23 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous play (19 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 16:02:52 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous play (35 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:35:48 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous play (25 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:11:12 -0500

16. Dangerous Play
    • Re: Dangerous Play (17 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:02:12 -0800

17. Dangerous play
    • Re: Dangerous play (55 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:04:59 -0800

18. Dangerous Play
    • Re: Dangerous Play (33 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:40:39 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous Play (28 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 18:31:07 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous Play (16 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:07:38 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous Play (18 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:45:53 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous Play (36 lines)
      From: pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:12:05 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous Play (37 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:38:12 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous Play (68 lines)
      From: pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 10:45:44 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous Play (104 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 11:46:27 -0800
    • Re: Dangerous Play (32 lines)
      From: pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:40:08 -0800

19. Dangerous Play (revised)
    • Dangerous Play (revised) (41 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 00:25:49 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous Play (revised) (50 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 07:57:38 -0600
    • Re: Dangerous Play (revised) (33 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:35:57 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous Play (revised) (45 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:58:29 -0600

20. Dangerous Play and OGSO
    • Re: Dangerous Play and OGSO (34 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 14:45:12 -0800

21. Dangerous Play, # 2
    • Re: Dangerous Play, # 2 (68 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 08:11:29 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous Play, # 2 (49 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:43:08 -0700

22. English Premier League & Ref Assessments
    • Re: English Premier League & Ref Assessments (30 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:05:13 -0500

23. Even listservers which screen viruses/attachments can indirectly infect you!
    • Even listservers which screen viruses/attachments can indirectly infect you! (66 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:57:15 -0500

24. FIFA's guinea pig wears Red,White, and Blue.
    • FIFA's guinea pig wears Red,White, and Blue. (32 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:31:37 -0800
    • Re: FIFA's guinea pig wears Red,White, and Blue. (28 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:51:08 -0200
    • Re: FIFA's guinea pig wears Red,White, and Blue. (45 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:01:34 -0800

25. For The Good Of The Game & "doing the least"?
    • Re: For The Good Of The Game & "doing the least"? (39 lines)
      From: Patrick Donohoe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:01:37 -0500
    • Re: For The Good Of The Game & "doing the least"? (72 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:17:53 -0600
    • Re: For The Good Of The Game & "doing the least"? (84 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:24:42 -0500

26. Inner Game of Soccer Refereeing
    • Inner Game of Soccer Refereeing (21 lines)
      From: Peter Angelo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 02:02:23 -0500

27. Martian Scenario #44
    • Martian Scenario #44 (142 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:05:09 -0800

28. mindless stupidity at high school game
    • mindless stupidity at high school game (74 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:10:53 -0500
    • Re: mindless stupidity at high school game (89 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:39:49 -0500
    • Re: mindless stupidity at high school game (107 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:55:31 -0500

29. Misconduct off the play
    • Re: Misconduct off the play (54 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 23:21:05 -0700
    • Re: Misconduct off the play (32 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 01:19:49 -0500

30. Misrepresentation of too many whistles
    • Misrepresentation of too many whistles (104 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 09:52:56 -0800
    • Re: Misrepresentation of too many whistles (39 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 12:49:12 -0600
    • Re: Misrepresentation of too many whistles (50 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:41:14 -0500

31. Mozart ...
    • Re: Mozart ... (21 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:58:34 -0500

32. Nominations for "Best SOCREF-L Suggestion of 2001"
    • Nominations for "Best SOCREF-L Suggestion of 2001" (17 lines)
      From: Dale Holmen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 15:54:11 -0700
    • Re: Nominations for "Best SOCREF-L Suggestion of 2001" (32 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:13:58 -0500
    • Nominations for "Best SOCREF-L Suggestion of 2001" (22 lines)
      From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:21:27 -0600
    • Re: Nominations for "Best SOCREF-L Suggestion of 2001" (31 lines)
      From: Andy Elster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:23:07 -0800
    • Re: Nominations for "Best SOCREF-L Suggestion of 2001" (27 lines)
      From: Dale Holmen <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:35:23 -0700

33. Of VC and PKs (or not)
    • Of VC and PKs (or not) (51 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 21:06:42 -0500

34. Off ball reckless foul
    • Off ball reckless foul (52 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 15:49:42 -0500
    • Re: Off ball reckless foul (39 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:47:08 -0800
    • Re: Off ball reckless foul (72 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:24:41 -0500

35. OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling??
    • OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling?? (21 lines)
      From: Bradley, Eddie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:51:00 -0600
    • Re: OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling?? (34 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:20:53 -0500
    • Re: OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling?? (41 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:25:58 -0500
    • OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling?? (53 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:26:44 -0500
    • Re: OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling?? (26 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 15:36:59 -0600
    • Re: OGSO foul or OOPS!!! - just handling?? (41 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 18:43:49 -0200

36. Professionalism and Officiating
    • Professionalism and Officiating (198 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:32:37 -0500
    • Re: Professionalism and Officiating (118 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:59:26 -0500
    • Re: Professionalism and Officiating (112 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 09:24:42 -0600

37. Reading Posts
    • Reading Posts (32 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 10:13:08 -0500

38. Red Card for Goalie? and then what?
    • Re: Red Card for Goalie? and then what? (35 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 00:11:02 EST
    • Re: Red Card for Goalie? and then what? (36 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:30:41 -0700
    • Re: Red Card for Goalie? and then what? (18 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:24:51 -0500
    • Re: Red Card for Goalie? and then what? (36 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 22:26:00 -0500

39. Regarding Kara from Mass
    • Re: Regarding Kara from Mass (44 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:33:30 -0500

40. Regarding Kara from Mass.
    • Regarding Kara from Mass. (33 lines)
      From: chuck ruschak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:11:56 -0800

41. Remove from list
    • Remove from list (14 lines)
      From: Howard LaGray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 07:22:58 -0500

42. Respect? (re: list behavior, not reffing)
    • Respect? (re: list behavior, not reffing) (54 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:20:21 -0500

43. Schwan's USA CUP '02
    • Schwan's USA CUP '02 (16 lines)
      From: Michael F. Rolfes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 19:14:08 EST

44. Selling the product requires "punchy mottos" . So, : "Stop and Smell the Whistles!"........(hmm?)
    • Selling the product requires "punchy mottos" . So, : "Stop and Smell the Whistles!"........(hmm?) (25 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:14:52 -0800
    • Re: Selling the product requires "punchy mottos" . So, : "Stop and Smell the Whistles!"........(hmm?) (23 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:41:21 -0800

45. Send-Off the Impeder
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder (27 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 22:47:23 -0700
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder (50 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 02:15:17 -0500
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder (49 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:13:00 -0600
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder (35 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:13:18 -0800
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder (49 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:35:24 -0500
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder (63 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 14:37:01 -0500

46. Send-Off the Impeder.
    • Re: Send-Off the Impeder. (71 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:45:10 -0800

47. Sign on/off
    • Sign on/off (13 lines)
      From: CHAD CHRISTIAN <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 19:48:36 -0600
    • Re: Sign on/off (25 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:43:37 -0800
    • Re: Sign on/off (19 lines)
      From: Rollie Littlewood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 06:40:06 -0600
    • Re: Sign on/off (31 lines)
      From: Ned S. Levi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:04:04 -0500

48. Snowball throwing Aberdeen fans
    • Snowball throwing Aberdeen fans (25 lines)
      From: Van Emden Henson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 07:38:09 -0800

49. Soccer gear in London
    • Soccer gear in London (54 lines)
      From: Don Brown <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:10:04 -0800

50. Socref Annual Census
    • Re: Socref Annual Census (12 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 21:09:36 -0800

51. Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of Dav id".....).....
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of Dav id".....)..... (19 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:11:43 EST

52. Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of Dav id".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..."
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of Dav id".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (27 lines)
      From: DeWys, Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:53:33 -0500

53. Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..."
    • Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (51 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:25:50 -0800
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (34 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:01:30 -0500
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (25 lines)
      From: Brent Wanstreet <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:36:08 EST
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (59 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:07:36 -0800
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (40 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:50:20 -0800
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House of David".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:39:49 EST

54. Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House ofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..."
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House ofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (65 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:59:20 -0500
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House ofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (91 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:23:54 -0800
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The House ofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (57 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:58:52 -0500

55. Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The HouseofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..."
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The HouseofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (48 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:55:58 -0500
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. (formerly known as "The HouseofDavid".....).....and "The Confusions of Saint Jack..." (40 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:13:18 -0600

56. Socref Annual Census. , (see Tony's Hall of Flame"),,, and "Contents Labelling."..., and "Midnight Referee"..
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. , (see Tony's Hall of Flame"),,, and "Contents Labelling."..., and "Midnight Referee".. (75 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:51:05 -0800

57. Socref Annual Census. Hall of Flame
    • Re: Socref Annual Census. Hall of Flame (27 lines)
      From: Referees <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:16:37 +1100

58. SOCREF Archives (was Sign on/off)
    • Re: SOCREF Archives (was Sign on/off) (27 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 08:00:11 -0500

59. SOCREF-L Digest - 31 Dec 2001 to 1 Jan 2002 (#2002-2)
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 31 Dec 2001 to 1 Jan 2002 (#2002-2) (34 lines)
      From: leslie beckham <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 07:10:38 -0800

60. SOCREF-L Digest - 5 Jan 2002 to 6 Jan 2002 (#2002-7)
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 5 Jan 2002 to 6 Jan 2002 (#2002-7) (91 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:30:03 -0700

61. Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments
    • Re: Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments (39 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 08:39:11 -0400

62. Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments on EPL)
    • Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments on EPL) (54 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 00:32:22 -0400

63. Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments onEPL)
    • Re: Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments onEPL) (28 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 23:55:33 -0500
    • Re: Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: Comments onEPL) (45 lines)
      From: William Noyes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:02:00 -0800

64. Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: CommentsonEPL)
    • Re: Spectator desires at odds with player safety? (Was: CommentsonEPL) (18 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:28:00 -0500

65. Stoppages For Misconduct ONLY
    • Stoppages For Misconduct ONLY (61 lines)
      From: Dan Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 23:43:11 -0800
    • Re: Stoppages For Misconduct ONLY (77 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 07:52:23 -0500
    • Re: Stoppages For Misconduct ONLY (93 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 09:19:54 -0500

66. Teamwork, hustle and 3 whistles
    • Teamwork, hustle and 3 whistles (116 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:21:35 -0500
    • Re: Teamwork, hustle and 3 whistles (44 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 09:59:48 -0800
    • Re: Teamwork, hustle and 3 whistles (158 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 19:04:04 -0500

67. Too many whistles, Mozart . . . (was he the one that was deaf ?)
    • Re: Too many whistles, Mozart . . . (was he the one that was deaf ?) (22 lines)
      From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:19:25 -0600

68. Too many whistles, Mozart . . . (was he the one that was deaf?)
    • Re: Too many whistles, Mozart . . . (was he the one that was deaf?) (175 lines)
      From: Keith Francis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 23:22:19 -0700

69. Tribute, dilemma, lesson
    • Tribute, dilemma, lesson (105 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:52:52 -0500
    • Re: Tribute, dilemma, lesson (21 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 17:04:29 -0800

70. Uniformity, uniforms, etc.
    • Uniformity, uniforms, etc. (22 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 18:25:38 -0800

71. Uniforms and Eduardo Brizio
    • Uniforms and Eduardo Brizio (30 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:43:22 -0500
    • Re: Uniforms and Eduardo Brizio (37 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:14:28 -0800

72. Virus in email message????
    • Virus in email message???? (19 lines)
      From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 09:12:13 -0600
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (39 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 10:39:02 -0500
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (36 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:30:49 -0500
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (37 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:20:04 -0500
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (57 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:11:00 -0600
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (16 lines)
      From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 17:36:17 -0800
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (50 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 21:14:19 -0500
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (55 lines)
      From: M. Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 22:45:58 -0800
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (137 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 10:01:30 -0500
    • Re: Virus in email message???? (32 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:38:13 -0600

73. Virus in email message???? -- Magic 8 Ball
    • Re: Virus in email message???? -- Magic 8 Ball (48 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 08:49:12 -0600

74. Viruses -- depend on yourself, not on others. (non-ref)
    • Viruses -- depend on yourself, not on others. (non-ref) (37 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:20:30 -0500
    • Re: Viruses -- depend on yourself, not on others. (non-ref) (56 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 13:44:43 -0600

75. we were just talking about this..
    • we were just talking about this.. (15 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 19:37:52 -0800
    • Re: we were just talking about this.. (22 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 05:39:08 -0500
    • Re: we were just talking about this.. (23 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 08:40:18 -0500

76. Whistles, Mozart and a New Year....
    • Whistles, Mozart and a New Year.... (89 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 20:37:20 -0500
    • Re: Whistles, Mozart and a New Year.... (30 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 18:05:47 -0800
    • Re: Whistles, Mozart and a New Year.... (120 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 21:22:39 -0800

77. Why not to trust your spell-checker, example #741 (at least ;=)
    • Why not to trust your spell-checker, example #741 (at least ;=) (33 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 16:49:08 -0500
    • Re: Why not to trust your spell-checker, example #741 (at least ;=) (19 lines)
      From: Kara Honthumb Lange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:01:29 EST