SOCREF-L Archives – February 2002, week 2

1. "Assess This - 3 Whistle System"
   • Re: "Assess This - 3 Whistle System" (30 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 02:07:51 -0500

2. "Assess THIS - How to Signal Goal"
   • "Assess THIS - How to Signal Goal" (75 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:37:42 -0500

3. "Assess This"
   • "Assess This" (62 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 11:25:29 -0800
   • Re: "Assess This" (80 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:43:28 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (31 lines)
     From: E.F. Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 08:45:32 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (29 lines)
     From: Sherman Whipple <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:17:08 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (61 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:56:54 -0800
   • Re: "Assess This" (32 lines)
     From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:07:23 -0600
   • Re: "Assess This" (30 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:21:02 -0800
   • Re: "Assess This" (38 lines)
     From: Sherman Whipple <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:47:07 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (39 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 21:04:13 -0200
   • Re: "Assess This" (76 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 20:27:38 -0800
   • Re: "Assess This" (36 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 20:50:22 -0800
   • Re: "Assess This" (22 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 23:51:44 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (34 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 21:15:51 -0800
   • Re: "Assess This" (29 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:56:27 EST
   • Re: "Assess This" (48 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 09:07:48 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (23 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 09:50:43 EST
   • Re: "Assess This" (18 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 11:38:47 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (79 lines)
     From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 12:20:35 -0500
   • Re: "Assess This" (71 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:32:37 -0800

4. "Assess This" ("The In&Out Goal").
   • Re: "Assess This" ("The In&Out Goal"). (99 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:58:09 -0800

5. "Assess This" (When can the AR demand the CR come and talk? )
   • Re: "Assess This" (When can the AR demand the CR come and talk? ) (62 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:05:16 -0800

6. "Fiends, Roamers, Soccerman,...lend me your ears"
   • Re: "Fiends, Roamers, Soccerman,...lend me your ears" (85 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:13:12 -0800

7. )and Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards)
   • )and Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (38 lines)
     From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 00:11:14 -0200

8. 2002 Ken Aston PRO Referee Camp
   • 2002 Ken Aston PRO Referee Camp (43 lines)
     From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 23:07:02 -0800
   • Re: 2002 Ken Aston PRO Referee Camp (53 lines)
     From: Peter Angelo <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:22:52 -0500
   • Re: 2002 Ken Aston PRO Referee Camp (78 lines)
     From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:38:03 -0800

9. 2002 Ken Aston Referee Camp
   • 2002 Ken Aston Referee Camp (50 lines)
     From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 23:01:40 -0800

10. 2nd Caution or Straight Red
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (31 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:27:08 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (42 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:01:49 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (44 lines)
      From: Lee & Alexandra <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:24:41 -0800
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (62 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:27:55 -0600
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (39 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:34:10 EST
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (42 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 19:48:21 +0000
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (62 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:14:40 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (26 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:20:47 EST
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (84 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:29:17 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (39 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 21:54:06 -0800
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (59 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:22:19 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (19 lines)
      From: Mike Young <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:53:11 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:57:11 EST
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (28 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:36:03 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (61 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:08:11 -0600
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (91 lines)
      From: DeWys, Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:04:41 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red (26 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 03:33:02 EDT

11. 2nd Caution or Straight Red and Massachusetts
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red and Massachusetts (59 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:07:30 -0500
    • Re: 2nd Caution or Straight Red and Massachusetts (88 lines)
      From: les baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 06:21:56 -0500

12. <No subject>
    • <No subject> (16 lines)
      From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:47:08 +0000

13. A referee in Poland
    • A referee in Poland (53 lines)
      From: Tom Krajewski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:18:07 EST

14. Applications for USA CUP
    • Applications for USA CUP (30 lines)
      From: Michael F. Rolfes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:10:05 EST
    • Re: Applications for USA CUP (13 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:52:00 EST
    • Re: Applications for USA CUP (20 lines)
      From: Michael F. Rolfes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:11:06 EST

15. Assessable games
    • Assessable games (47 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:28:54 -0500
    • Re: Assessable games (33 lines)
      From: Robert D. Canavan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:40:58 -0600
    • Re: Assessable games (47 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:03:35 -0600
    • Re: Assessable games (50 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:19:45 -0700

16. Association Webpage
    • Association Webpage (22 lines)
      From: Webmaster (SWLSRA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:42:04 -0600

17. Challenging the keeper
    • Challenging the keeper (24 lines)
      From: Anderegg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:08:09 -0800
    • Re: Challenging the keeper (36 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:56:09 -0500
    • Re: Challenging the keeper (41 lines)
      From: Matt Slovacek <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:11:30 EST
    • Re: Challenging the keeper (41 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:54:05 -0700
    • Re: Challenging the keeper (66 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:18:30 -0500
    • Re: Challenging the keeper (54 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:22:15 -0500
    • Challenging the keeper (97 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:56:27 -0800
    • Re: Challenging the keeper (115 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:14:46 -0500

18. Changing the ref's mind (and cards)
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 21:02:52 -0800
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (38 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:14:54 -0500
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (52 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:04:07 -0500
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:11:49 EST
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (53 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:20:28 -0600
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (63 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:10:34 -0500
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (41 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:20:02 -0500
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (65 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:23:03 -0500
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (42 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:31:09 -0500
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (92 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:56:19 -0800
    • Re: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (139 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:13:04 -0600

19. Credit
    • Re: Credit (39 lines)
      From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:41:05 -0800

20. Deception at the making of a Socref-l posting. (No Monty Hall content) "The Ed Show"
    • Re: Deception at the making of a Socref-l posting. (No Monty Hall content) "The Ed Show" (21 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 05:58:45 EST
    • Re: Deception at the making of a Socref-l posting. (No Monty Hall content) "The Ed Show" (33 lines)
      From: William Noyes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:23:55 -0800

21. Deception at the making of a Socref-l posting. (No Monty Hall content) ...
    • Re: Deception at the making of a Socref-l posting. (No Monty Hall content) ... (20 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:06:19 EST

22. Deliberately losing
    • Deliberately losing (27 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:21:35 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (49 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:20:09 EST
    • Re: Deliberately losing (45 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:25:07 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (26 lines)
      From: Kara Honthumb Lange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:06:05 EST
    • Re: Deliberately losing (60 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:20:20 -0800
    • Re: Deliberately losing (40 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:44:37 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (57 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:20:58 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (41 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:37:16 -0800
    • Re: Deliberately losing (55 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:32:47 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (90 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:44:24 -0800
    • Re: Deliberately losing (26 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:05:18 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (17 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:15:47 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing (87 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 03:33:02 EDT
    • Re: Deliberately losing (97 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:59:01 -0500

23. Deliberately losing, and the Ref must let the crook remain in the game??????????????
    • Re: Deliberately losing, and the Ref must let the crook remain in the game?????????????? (63 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:32:41 -0800
    • Re: Deliberately losing, and the Ref must let the crook remain in the game?????????????? (71 lines)
      From: Kara Honthumb Lange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:55:48 EST
    • Re: Deliberately losing, and the Ref must let the crook remain in the game?????????????? (102 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:13:26 -0500
    • Re: Deliberately losing, and the Ref must let the crook remain in the game?????????????? (132 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:03:45 -0800

24. Deliberatly losing
    • Deliberatly losing (27 lines)
      From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:55:14 +0000

25. Dribblers' Rights
    • Dribblers' Rights (29 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:50:18 EST
    • Re: Dribblers' Rights (59 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:11:20 -0600
    • Re: Dribblers' Rights (62 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 12:19:39 -0500

26. Excellent website
    • Excellent website (31 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:03:26 -0500
    • Re: Excellent website (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:35:04 GMT

27. Follow up on a previous question
    • Follow up on a previous question (18 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:33:48 -0500

28. FW: Credit
    • FW: Credit (23 lines)
      From: Rick Troup <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:00:00 -0600

29. FW: FW: Changing the ref's mind (and cards)
    • FW: FW: Changing the ref's mind (and cards) (30 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:28:44 -0800

30. FW: When to Insist
    • FW: When to Insist (106 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:21:31 -0500

31. Home Page - The National Atlas of the United States of America
    • Home Page - The National Atlas of the United States of America (15 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:07:29 -0800

32. Homer & the Axis of evil
    • Re: Homer & the Axis of evil (66 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:40:51 -0200

33. Homer (no Simpson's content)
    • Homer (no Simpson's content) (68 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:01:58 -0500
    • Re: Homer (no Simpson's content) (51 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:50:39 -0500

34. If you can't get enough Beanpot
    • If you can't get enough Beanpot (40 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:52:06 -0500

35. If you can't get enough Soccer (was Beanpot)
    • Re: If you can't get enough Soccer (was Beanpot) (61 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:57:22 -0500
    • Re: If you can't get enough Soccer (was Beanpot) (20 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:19:30 -0800

36. If you're anywhere near Atlanta this weekend ...
    • If you're anywhere near Atlanta this weekend ... (70 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:39:27 -0500

37. looking for a labor day tournament recommendation
    • looking for a labor day tournament recommendation (28 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:32:54 -0500
    • Re: looking for a labor day tournament recommendation (23 lines)
      From: Referees <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:17:44 +1100

38. Monaco v. Bordeaux ?
    • Monaco v. Bordeaux ? (17 lines)
      From: Michael McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:44:48 -0500
    • Re: Monaco v. Bordeaux ? (22 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:59:00 -0500
    • Re: Monaco v. Bordeaux ? (28 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:47:35 -0500
    • Re: Monaco v. Bordeaux ? (34 lines)
      From: Referees <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:05:39 +1100
    • Re: Monaco v. Bordeaux ? (30 lines)
      From: Michael McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:19:41 -0500

39. More soccer news
    • More soccer news (14 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:33:55 EST

40. Mr. Barry
    • Re: Mr. Barry (106 lines)
      From: Allen Sheasley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:55:37 -0500

41. National Federation per-game sportsmanship talk
    • Re: National Federation per-game sportsmanship talk (33 lines)
      From: Michael McGuire <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:40:03 -0500

42. NC contact
    • NC contact (13 lines)
      From: Bill Sako <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 20:34:43 -0600
    • Re: NC contact (23 lines)
      From: Carl Neighbors <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:39:33 -0500

43. NC contact - Raleigh, NC
    • Re: NC contact - Raleigh, NC (35 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:44:04 -0500

44. NF quandry
    • NF quandry (51 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:27:08 -0500

45. Now - Valuing your ARs
    • Now - Valuing your ARs (35 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:54:50 EST
    • Re: Now - Valuing your ARs (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:11:15 EST
    • Re: Now - Valuing your ARs (21 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:42:11 EST

46. Playing to lose.
    • Playing to lose. (43 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:40:52 -0500

47. PLEASE DON'T POST RESULTS!
    • PLEASE DON'T POST RESULTS! (28 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:10:22 -0500

48. Possibly unconscious player.
    • Possibly unconscious player. (38 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:34:27 -0500
    • Re: Possibly unconscious player. (34 lines)
      From: Charles Treat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:45:05 +0000

49. Recert Clinic Format
    • Recert Clinic Format (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:55:19 EST
    • Re: Recert Clinic Format (23 lines)
      From: Ron Magin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:46:21 -0500
    • Re: Recert Clinic Format (14 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:43:49 EST
    • Re: Recert Clinic Format (24 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:01:01 -0500

50. Red Card--better late than never?
    • Red Card--better late than never? (34 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:42:39 -0700
    • Re: Red Card--better late than never? (44 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:12:37 -0500

51. Referee classes (lack of students)
    • Referee classes (lack of students) (25 lines)
      From: Greg L. Gaunt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 07:12:54 -0700
    • Re: Referee classes (lack of students) (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 14:28:58 EST
    • Re: Referee classes (lack of students) (14 lines)
      From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:44:10 EST

52. Return of injured player
    • Return of injured player (28 lines)
      From: Charles Treat <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:22:02 +0000

53. SCHWAN'S USA CUP - Youth Soccer Tournaments
    • Re: SCHWAN'S USA CUP - Youth Soccer Tournaments (39 lines)
      From: James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:27:27 -0400

54. server slow today ... ??
    • server slow today ... ?? (20 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:12:11 -0600
    • Re: server slow today ... ?? (36 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:20:40 -0500
    • Re: server slow today ... ?? (24 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:54:37 -0500

55. Signal for a judges hosing
    • Re: Signal for a judges hosing (25 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 23:45:12 -0200
    • Re: Signal for a judges hosing (36 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:07:32 -0800

56. Signal for goal
    • Signal for goal (77 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 08:52:51 -0800
    • Re: Signal for goal (42 lines)
      From: Sherman Whipple <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 15:45:48 -0500
    • Re: Signal for goal (63 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:05:47 -0500
    • Re: Signal for goal (33 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:16:18 -0800
    • Re: Signal for goal (36 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:44:22 EST
    • Re: Signal for goal (61 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:26:29 -0500
    • Re: Signal for goal (39 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:51:48 -0500
    • Re: Signal for goal (28 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:31:34 -0800

57. Silver Threads and "Golden Needles".., and "The FAL Guy".
    • Re: Silver Threads and "Golden Needles".., and "The FAL Guy". (57 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 04:42:39 -0700
    • Re: Silver Threads and "Golden Needles".., and "The FAL Guy". (31 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:29:17 -0500

58. Sit-outs, yellow-reds, and being tight with cards
    • Sit-outs, yellow-reds, and being tight with cards (62 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 12:11:44 -0500
    • Re: Sit-outs, yellow-reds, and being tight with cards (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:25:43 EST

59. Talk: US vs. Italy
    • Talk: US vs. Italy (56 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:48:34 -0800
    • Re: Talk: US vs. Italy (74 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:47:18 -0700
    • Re: Talk: US vs. Italy (20 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:14:46 EST

60. The Height of Sportsmanship (Olympic pairs skating)
    • The Height of Sportsmanship (Olympic pairs skating) (45 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:26:05 -0700

61. The Regression Theory of Time. ("Tempus Repeatus ?)
    • Re: The Regression Theory of Time. ("Tempus Repeatus ?) (42 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:57:28 -0800

62. The ultimate assessment/assessor
    • The ultimate assessment/assessor (18 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:39:06 -0500
    • Re: The ultimate assessment/assessor (23 lines)
      From: Phil Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 20:46:57 -0200

63. Top Level Referee News
    • Top Level Referee News (47 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:11:28 -0500
    • Re: Top Level Referee News (55 lines)
      From: Kara Honthumb Lange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:43:19 EST

64. Unfortunate Situation -- in defense of the assignor
    • Re: Unfortunate Situation -- in defense of the assignor (35 lines)
      From: Mann, Ivan H <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:24:54 -0600
    • Re: Unfortunate Situation -- in defense of the assignor (94 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:55:39 -0500

65. UPDATED - Ken Aston Tributes
    • UPDATED - Ken Aston Tributes (36 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 23:11:51 -0800

66. USA v. ITALY
    • USA v. ITALY (49 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:58:28 -0500
    • Re: USA v. ITALY (31 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:13:26 -0800

67. USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty).
    • USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (37 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 22:36:28 -0800
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (60 lines)
      From: Peter Guthrie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 05:58:17 -0700
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (29 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 09:58:05 EST
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (83 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:47:51 -0800
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (15 lines)
      From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:39:28 EST
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:40:03 EST
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (39 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:17:19 -0800
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (49 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:47:48 -0600
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (17 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:02:45 -0800
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (62 lines)
      From: AMPM <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:35:16 -0600
    • Re: USSF course in "Remedial Communication Skills" ( how to talk pretty). (83 lines)
      From: les baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:52:59 -0500

68. Website review for www.NCRefs.org
    • Website review for www.NCRefs.org (69 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:09:59 -0500

69. What a game!
    • What a game! (15 lines)
      From: Robert Evans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:20:00 -0800

70. What is a "kick"?
    • What is a "kick"? (79 lines)
      From: AMPM <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:02:00 -0600
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (71 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:09:49 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (47 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:25:49 EST
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (26 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:48:15 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (58 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:10:57 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (82 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:49:43 -0800
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (93 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:41:02 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (9 lines)
      From: Mike Young <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:21:39 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (15 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:02:35 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (36 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:45:23 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (14 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:56:49 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (30 lines)
      From: AMPM <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:17:22 -0600
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (15 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:44:06 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (12 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:57:13 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (35 lines)
      From: Art Hundiak <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 17:07:07 -0800
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (25 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:40:23 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (31 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:08:13 -0500
    • Re: What is a "kick"? (19 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:18:22 -0800

71. What's this???
    • What's this??? (33 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:45:02 -0500
    • Re: What's this??? (38 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:25:45 -0600
    • Re: What's this??? (55 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:10:27 -0600
    • Re: What's this??? (28 lines)
      From: Spence Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:50:46 EST

72. When is a player not a player?
    • When is a player not a player? (27 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:30:53 -0500

73. When is a player out of play?
    • When is a player out of play? (40 lines)
      From: Kent Bossange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 21:52:23 -0800
    • Re: When is a player out of play? (41 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 01:37:49 -0500
    • Re: When is a player out of play? (65 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:55:41 -0500
    • Re: When is a player out of play? (67 lines)
      From: Geoff Blood <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:16:10 -0800
    • Re: When is a player out of play? (85 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:52:53 -0500

74. When to Insist
    • Re: When to Insist (66 lines)
      From: Robert T. Wright <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:33:10 -0500
    • Re: When to Insist (77 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:33:38 -0500
    • Re: When to Insist (37 lines)
      From: Dan Cawley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:14:31 -0600
    • Re: When to Insist (107 lines)
      From: Joe Heneghan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:01:47 EST
    • Re: When to Insist (27 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:31:07 -0500
    • Re: When to Insist (143 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:25:10 -0800

75. When to Insist (slight variation)
    • Re: When to Insist (slight variation) (23 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:36:33 -0500
    • Re: When to Insist (slight variation) (47 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:43:14 -0500

76. When to INSIST?
    • When to INSIST? (45 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:55:08 -0500
    • Re: When to INSIST? (77 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:38:52 -0500
    • When to INSIST? (83 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:42:57 -0500
    • Re: When to INSIST? (32 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:24:05 -0500
    • Re: When to INSIST? (44 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:21:59 -0500

77. Where is it written?
    • Re: Where is it written? (30 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:57:35 EST
    • Re: Where is it written? (41 lines)
      From: Brian Casey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:38:12 -0800
    • Re: Where is it written? (52 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:59:17 EST

78. Who needs protection!!!!
    • Re: Who needs protection!!!! (54 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:40:54 -0800

79. Yellow cards might invade the business world ...
    • Yellow cards might invade the business world ... (39 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:43:33 -0600
    • Re: Yellow cards might invade the business world ... (34 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 14:29:17 -0500