SOCREF-L Archives – November 2002, week 4

1. "Diamonds on the soles of Her Shoes"= No disputes about Offside.
   • "Diamonds on the soles of Her Shoes"= No disputes about Offside. (38 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:51:03 -0800
   • Re: "Diamonds on the soles of Her Shoes"= No disputes about Offside. (110 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:21:37 -0500
   • Re: "Diamonds on the soles of Her Shoes"= No disputes about Offside. (196 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:19:46 -0800

2. "If a Ref didn't whistle in the forest, would the birds respond in kind?
   • Re: "If a Ref didn't whistle in the forest, would the birds respond in kind? (86 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 00:13:05 -0800
   • Re: "If a Ref didn't whistle in the forest, would the birds respond in kind? (93 lines)
     From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 06:54:41 -0800

3. "lost" IFK (was: oral fouling (was impeding))
   • "lost" IFK (was: oral fouling (was impeding)) (147 lines)
     From: Bill Salganik <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:48:28 -0500

4. "No whistle" restarts after a goal
   • "No whistle" restarts after a goal (39 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:03:05 -0800
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (35 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:13:01 -0500
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (35 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:29:45 EST
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (41 lines)
     From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:40:33 -0500
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (19 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:42:44 -0500
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (37 lines)
     From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:26:23 -0700
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (72 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:24:54 -0500
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (34 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:37:12 -0500
   • Re: "No whistle" restarts after a goal (51 lines)
     From: Skip Wangbickler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:55:46 +0000

5. "Oral impeding"??
   • "Oral impeding"?? (46 lines)
     From: Jim Allen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:03:59 -0500
   • Re: "Oral impeding"?? (17 lines)
     From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:57:11 -0800
   • Re: "Oral impeding"?? (46 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 15:33:47 -0500

6. 39 Years On!.. (not soccer.)
   • 39 Years On!.. (not soccer.) (20 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:17:56 -0800
   • Re: 39 Years On!.. (not soccer.) (30 lines)
     From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 06:33:20 -0600

7. Assistant referee felled as Kabylie complete CAF Cup hat-trick
   • Assistant referee felled as Kabylie complete CAF Cup hat-trick (49 lines)
     From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:35:30 -0800

8. Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week
   • Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (67 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 01:40:34 -0500
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (90 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:52:12 -0500
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (94 lines)
     From: SATX Soccer Ref <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:21:08 -0600
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (118 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 06:31:33 -0800
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (22 lines)
     From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:03:07 -0500
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (34 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:19:40 -0800
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (21 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 07:55:51 +0000
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (89 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:24:25 -0500

9. Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week, part DeuxDeux.
   • Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week, part DeuxDeux. (15 lines)
     From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:30:36 -0800

10. Boca Juniors v. Independiente (was today's champions league)
    • Boca Juniors v. Independiente (was today's champions league) (48 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:36:06 -0600

11. BSW is not always as perfect as MC alleges
    • BSW is not always as perfect as MC alleges (77 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:09:12 -0500
    • Re: BSW is not always as perfect as MC alleges (50 lines)
      From: Roger Metzler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:08:44 -0800
    • Re: BSW is not always as perfect as MC alleges (30 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:29:50 -0500

12. Caution or Not (Was: under 12)
    • Re: Caution or Not (Was: under 12) (37 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:09:38 EST

13. Caution under 12
    • Caution under 12 (19 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 16:11:58 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (75 lines)
      From: Roger Metzler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 17:39:25 -0800
    • Re: Caution under 12 (88 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 22:19:26 -0500
    • Re: Caution under 12 (33 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:17:35 -0800
    • Re: Caution under 12 (64 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 07:35:39 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (104 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 07:44:12 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (48 lines)
      From: Gregory Houle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:55:58 -0500
    • Re: Caution under 12 (70 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:42:46 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (62 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 18:10:47 -0500
    • Re: Caution under 12 (41 lines)
      From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 05:50:00 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (16 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:42:21 -0800
    • Re: Caution under 12 (42 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 17:50:18 -0800
    • Re: Caution under 12 (39 lines)
      From: txsocref - South <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:02:40 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (57 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 22:26:08 -0700
    • Re: Caution under 12 (51 lines)
      From: txsocref - South <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:28:48 -0600
    • Re: Caution under 12 (47 lines)
      From: Gregory Houle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 01:17:23 -0500
    • Re: Caution under 12 (33 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:39:01 -0700
    • Re: Caution under 12 (33 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:36:40 -0500
    • Re: Caution under 12 (55 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:57:26 -0600

14. Dangerous equipment
    • Re: Dangerous equipment (27 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:19:11 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous equipment (25 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:07:57 -0500
    • Re: Dangerous equipment (55 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:22:43 -0600

15. DB v. IFK Restarts
    • DB v. IFK Restarts (55 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:30:25 -0500
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (95 lines)
      From: Edward Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 07:39:39 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (117 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:39:54 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (157 lines)
      From: Edward Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:05:17 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (158 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:17:59 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (29 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:43:01 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (42 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:04:04 -0500
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (16 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:22:09 -0500
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (49 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:34:34 -0500
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (29 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:50:06 -0500
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (21 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:03:17 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (43 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:26:51 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (49 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 18:45:57 -0800
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (69 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 22:22:10 -0500
    • Re: DB v. IFK Restarts (35 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 07:05:08 -0800

16. delayed punishment (was oral fouling (was impeding))
    • Re: delayed punishment (was oral fouling (was impeding)) (193 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:36:49 -0600

17. fair/foul charges
    • fair/foul charges (24 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:29:47 -0800
    • Re: fair/foul charges (61 lines)
      From: Even, Bill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:40:47 -0700
    • Re: fair/foul charges (25 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:59:09 -0800
    • Re: fair/foul charges (26 lines)
      From: Richard Miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:51:40 EST
    • Re: fair/foul charges (34 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:21:14 -0800
    • Re: fair/foul charges (60 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:24:19 -0500

18. FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>.
    • FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>. (105 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:35:03 -0800
    • Re: FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>. (39 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:57:47 -0500
    • Re: FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>. (65 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:09:21 -0800
    • Re: FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>. (27 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:25:06 -0600

19. FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>., (ammo for the Verbal Stun Gun!)
    • Re: FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>., (ammo for the Verbal Stun Gun!) (45 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:39:17 -0800
    • Re: FW: BSW is the "Ravin' Raven" <g>., (ammo for the Verbal Stun Gun!) (63 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:08:21 -0800

20. Fw: Fw: whistle for kickoff?
    • Fw: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (34 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 11:15:23 -0600

21. Fw: oral fouling (was impeding)
    • Fw: oral fouling (was impeding) (40 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:42:38 -0600
    • Re: Fw: oral fouling (was impeding) (25 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 12:21:13 -0800
    • Re: Fw: oral fouling (was impeding) (40 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:55:59 -0600

22. Fw: Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week
    • Fw: Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (49 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 15:35:22 -0600
    • Re: Fw: Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (33 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 06:50:50 EST
    • Re: Fw: Re: Astonishing Referee Trick of the Week (45 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:24:39 -0600

23. Fw: Re: Happy Thanksgiving ...
    • Fw: Re: Happy Thanksgiving ... (71 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:33:33 -0600

24. Fw: Rules of the competition v. LOTG
    • Fw: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (25 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:44:48 -0600

25. Fw: whistle for kickoff?
    • Fw: whistle for kickoff? (25 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:23:53 -0600
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:01:51 -0800
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (38 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:45:52 -0600
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (21 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:54:43 -0500
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (70 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 23:08:01 -0500
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (52 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:08:42 -0800
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (42 lines)
      From: John Crown <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 20:50:31 -0800
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 21:05:31 -0800
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (55 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:32:26 -0800
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (18 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 22:50:31 -0800
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (25 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 08:40:59 -0500

26. Fw: whistle for kickoff? (...or say "Simon Says.....")
    • Re: Fw: whistle for kickoff? (...or say "Simon Says.....") (49 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 09:52:34 -0800

27. Happy Thanksgiving ...
    • Happy Thanksgiving ... (30 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 09:53:31 -0600
    • Re: Happy Thanksgiving ... (61 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:32:38 -0800
    • Re: Happy Thanksgiving ... (43 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:56:45 -0500
    • Re: Happy Thanksgiving ... (52 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 23:54:10 -0500
    • Re: Happy Thanksgiving ... (37 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:52:31 -0800

28. Hu's on first?
    • Hu's on first? (160 lines)
      From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 05:50:45 -0800
    • Re: Hu's on first? (172 lines)
      From: fspeirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 09:20:53 -0500

29. IQ test for SOCREF Posters
    • IQ test for SOCREF Posters (102 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:11:33 -0500
    • Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters (121 lines)
      From: John Eyre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:37:53 -0800
    • Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters (34 lines)
      From: Jim Livingston <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:47:16 -0500
    • Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters (38 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:53:20 -0500
    • Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters (37 lines)
      From: Chuck Mason <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:43:44 -0500

30. Light Bulb List Members
    • Light Bulb List Members (91 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 11:00:46 -0800
    • Re: Light Bulb List Members (104 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:04:26 -0500
    • Re: Light Bulb List Members (38 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 16:06:33 -0600

31. NF Exam Q (was Referee Abuse II)
    • Re: NF Exam Q (was Referee Abuse II) (114 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:54:20 -0500
    • Re: NF Exam Q (was Referee Abuse II) (136 lines)
      From: Aaron Propes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:08:50 -0600
    • NF Exam Q (was Referee Abuse II) (46 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:25:01 -0500
    • Re: NF Exam Q (was Referee Abuse II) (66 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:27:45 -0500
    • Re: NF Exam Q (was Referee Abuse II) (18 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:25:05 -0500

32. NF rule conflict - spot of IFK after play stopped for misconduct
    • NF rule conflict - spot of IFK after play stopped for misconduct (75 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:42:21 -0500

33. oral fouling (was impeding)
    • oral fouling (was impeding) (93 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:21:10 -0500
    • Re: oral fouling (was impeding) (125 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 22:23:25 -0500
    • Re: oral fouling (was impeding) (99 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:24:02 -0500
    • Re: oral fouling (was impeding) (40 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:29:10 -0500
    • Re: oral fouling (was impeding) (117 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:20:37 -0500

34. oral impeding
    • oral impeding (19 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:36:31 -0600
    • Re: oral impeding (60 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:27:38 -0500
    • Re: oral impeding (100 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:40:07 -0800
    • Re: oral impeding (179 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:55:09 -0500
    • Re: oral impeding (214 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 12:00:36 -0800
    • Re: oral impeding (83 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:58:25 -0600
    • Re: oral impeding (60 lines)
      From: Robert Canavan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:21:51 -0600
    • Re: oral impeding (25 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:15:08 EST
    • Re: oral impeding (20 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:35:37 -0800

35. Re. Stop CK, or PK
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (128 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:53:50 -0500
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (89 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:55:49 EST
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (56 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 06:48:46 -0800
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (86 lines)
      From: Edward Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:24:40 -0800
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (200 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:55:22 -0800
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (219 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 20:07:22 -0500
    • Re: Re. Stop CK, or PK (230 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 21:18:52 -0500

36. Re; Referee Abuse II
    • Re; Referee Abuse II (26 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 08:09:10 EST

37. Referee Abuse II
    • Referee Abuse II (27 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 21:11:12 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (55 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 21:52:23 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (90 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:17:14 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (23 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 19:29:10 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (23 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:13:27 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (83 lines)
      From: txsocref - South <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 23:26:34 -0600
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (41 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 07:15:55 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (38 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 07:46:05 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (25 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 05:54:05 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (53 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 05:50:02 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (65 lines)
      From: Ned S. Levi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:30:48 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (84 lines)
      From: Justin Burns <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:03:09 EST
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (21 lines)
      From: Mike Young <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:12:22 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (78 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:20:26 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (65 lines)
      From: Aaron Propes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:50:40 -0600
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (86 lines)
      From: Bud Hinckley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:43:48 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (20 lines)
      From: David Drexler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:49:59 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (59 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 12:43:59 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (66 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:05:03 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 18:28:58 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (91 lines)
      From: Skip Wangbickler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:56:53 +0000
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (33 lines)
      From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:03:44 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (46 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:34:52 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (39 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:30:35 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (10 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:10:28 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (84 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 18:22:44 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (24 lines)
      From: John Crown <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:09:21 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (27 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 23:15:57 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (26 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:03:32 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (51 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:06:42 -0500
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (45 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:27:54 -0800
    • Re: Referee Abuse II (49 lines)
      From: Chuck Mason <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 20:58:50 -0500

38. Referee Pre-emptive Strikes.
    • Re: Referee Pre-emptive Strikes. (121 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 08:23:04 -0800

39. Rules of the competition v. LOTG
    • Rules of the competition v. LOTG (15 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:05:51 -0600
    • Re: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (35 lines)
      From: DeWys,Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 09:20:23 -0500
    • Re: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (23 lines)
      From: Jim Mantle <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:04:23 -0500
    • Re: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (62 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 08:02:37 -0700
    • Re: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (65 lines)
      From: DeWys,Ted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:56:13 -0500
    • Re: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (25 lines)
      From: Marc Kutner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:25:13 -0600
    • Re: Rules of the competition v. LOTG (29 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 17:18:38 -0800

40. Soccer Cleats... SIZE 20
    • Re: Soccer Cleats... SIZE 20 (79 lines)
      From: George Davis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 01:08:23 -0500
    • Re: Soccer Cleats... SIZE 20 (25 lines)
      From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:39:14 EST
    • Re: Soccer Cleats... SIZE 20 (62 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:50:24 -0800
    • Re: Soccer Cleats... SIZE 20 (23 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:57:56 -0800

41. Software Question (Was: "Diamonds on the soles of Her Shoes")
    • Re: Software Question (Was: "Diamonds on the soles of Her Shoes") (21 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:19:16 +0000

42. Stefan Gunther is out of the office.
    • Stefan Gunther is out of the office. (17 lines)
      From: Stefan Gunther <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 04:12:41 -0500
    • Re: Stefan Gunther is out of the office. (13 lines)
      From: Doug Harris <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 07:39:07 -0500

43. Stop CK, or PK
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (73 lines)
      From: Bill Salganik <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 07:29:29 -0500
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:01:04 EST
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (47 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:07:05 -0500
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (47 lines)
      From: Edward Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:38:44 -0800
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (20 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:04:51 -0500
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (58 lines)
      From: Roger Metzler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 10:21:58 -0800
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK (27 lines)
      From: Ed Dinsmore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 11:08:28 -0800

44. Stop CK, or PK, or 'snap their synapses'.?
    • Re: Stop CK, or PK, or 'snap their synapses'.? (21 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:55:23 -0800

45. Stopping Play To Warn Keepers
    • Re: Stopping Play To Warn Keepers (46 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 11:08:28 -0800
    • Re: Stopping Play To Warn Keepers (64 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 21:51:44 -0500

46. Storm Showcase -- Dallas
    • Storm Showcase -- Dallas (11 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:16:09 -0500

47. Talk: Would you mind removing your shoes, sir?
    • Talk: Would you mind removing your shoes, sir? (39 lines)
      From: Andrew Castiglione <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:29:46 -0800

48. Testing the tester [Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters]
    • Testing the tester [Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters] (23 lines)
      From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:09:01 -0800
    • Re: Testing the tester [Re: IQ test for SOCREF Posters] (37 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:11:05 -0600

49. The RefDesk, and other expanding thoughts.
    • The RefDesk, and other expanding thoughts. (27 lines)
      From: jack barry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 17:36:16 -0800

50. today's champions league
    • today's champions league (15 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 10:43:17 -0800

51. verbal bullets
    • verbal bullets (13 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 21:47:21 -0600
    • Re: verbal bullets (37 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 23:00:26 -0600
    • Re: verbal bullets (15 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 20:51:31 -0800

52. Vignette from Adult Amateur Semifinal
    • Vignette from Adult Amateur Semifinal (111 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:31:35 -0500
    • Re: Vignette from Adult Amateur Semifinal (36 lines)
      From: Michael Cotleur <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:27:47 -0500

53. Vocal fouls (Was: IQ test for SOCREF Posters)
    • Re: Vocal fouls (Was: IQ test for SOCREF Posters) (21 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO, Los Angeles, CA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 14:18:17 EST

54. When is advantage realized?
    • Re: When is advantage realized? (52 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:59:48 -0800
    • Re: When is advantage realized? (66 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 00:44:45 -0500
    • Re: When is advantage realized? (84 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 06:59:52 -0700
    • Re: When is advantage realized? (56 lines)
      From: Sherman Whipple <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:19:04 -0500
    • Re: When is advantage realized? (47 lines)
      From: Dan Cawley <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 15:49:21 -0600
    • Re: When is advantage realized? (27 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:01:33 -0800

55. whistle for kickoff?
    • Re: whistle for kickoff? (19 lines)
      From: Jeffrey N. Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 16:37:36 -0500
    • Re: whistle for kickoff? (17 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:50:06 -0500