SOCREF-L Archives – August 2004, week 1

1. "End it like Beckham, a good story"
   • "End it like Beckham, a good story" (10 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 00:49:45 -0700

2. "laws made easy" wording
   • "laws made easy" wording (31 lines)
     From: Dennis Shimer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 05:57:49 -0400
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (27 lines)
     From: Byron Hetzler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:21:19 -0600
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (30 lines)
     From: Dennis Shimer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:51:53 -0400
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (52 lines)
     From: les baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:29:23 -0400
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (24 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:57:14 -0400
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (25 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 18:07:22 EDT
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (36 lines)
     From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 09:29:59 -0700
   • Re: "laws made easy" wording (37 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:07:09 -0400

3. A "short" change in the NFHS rules .... :-)
   • Re: A "short" change in the NFHS rules .... :-) (44 lines)
     From: Mike Wint <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 17:26:58 -0400
   • Re: A "short" change in the NFHS rules .... :-) (26 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:12:45 -0700
   • Re: A "short" change in the NFHS rules .... :-) (108 lines)
     From: Roy Inglis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:55:13 -0500

4. A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspensio...
   • Re: A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspensio... (35 lines)
     From: Ed Bazan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 07:19:23 EDT

5. A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspension??
   • A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspension?? (34 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 22:48:38 -0400
   • Re: A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspension?? (39 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 20:41:43 -0700
   • Re: A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspension?? (63 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:30:44 -0400
   • Re: A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspension?? (33 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 00:46:29 -0400
   • Re: A tale of 2 cities: Or when is a 1 game suspension not a 1 game suspension?? (28 lines)
     From: Wayne Pav <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:10:03 -0400

6. Assisting With Fouls
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (58 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:17:13 -0700
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (72 lines)
     From: stevem <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:08:29 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (107 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:26:44 -0500
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (131 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 02:36:34 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (174 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:00:19 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (36 lines)
     From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:59:01 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (20 lines)
     From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:31:46 +0000
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (41 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:40:00 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (52 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 18:12:57 -0700
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (23 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 06:51:58 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (53 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:30:20 +0000
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (50 lines)
     From: Albert M. Jones <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 22:47:32 +0000
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (75 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 21:39:00 -0400
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (81 lines)
     From: AMPM <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 20:59:49 -0500
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (35 lines)
     From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 19:01:30 -0700
   • Re: Assisting With Fouls (104 lines)
     From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:17:02 -0700

7. championsworld ar
   • championsworld ar (22 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 13:06:35 -0700
   • Re: championsworld ar (39 lines)
     From: Paul Avis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:24:49 -0400

8. IFK Offense (NISOA)
   • IFK Offense (NISOA) (18 lines)
     From: Wayne Pav <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:47:38 -0400
   • Re: IFK Offense (NISOA) (45 lines)
     From: Terry Broderick <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 12:43:10 -0700

9. Just when it seemed time to give up on MLS...
   • Just when it seemed time to give up on MLS... (30 lines)
     From: Dale Holmen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:09:39 -0600

10. love one game /=hate an other
    • love one game /=hate an other (16 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 04:59:58 -0500
    • Re: love one game /=hate an other (30 lines)
      From: Terry Thompson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 07:51:43 -0400

11. MLS Needs More Nuns
    • Re: MLS Needs More Nuns (27 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:30:52 -0700

12. NCAA Rulebook
    • NCAA Rulebook (18 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 18:37:58 -0600

13. opinions please re history DVDs
    • opinions please re history DVDs (19 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 01:26:20 -0500

14. players' salaries and fines
    • players' salaries and fines (36 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:26:04 +0000
    • Re: players' salaries and fines (64 lines)
      From: Kent Bossange <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:24:19 -0700
    • Re: players' salaries and fines (14 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 19:54:23 -0400
    • Re: players' salaries and fines (39 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:37:25 -0700

15. Substitute or Reduce To Equate
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (49 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:17:41 -0700
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (68 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 23:21:00 -0400
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (41 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:54:37 -0700
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (106 lines)
      From: SATX Soccer Ref <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 08:50:53 -0500
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (50 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:59:04 -0700
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (20 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:36:54 -0400
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (73 lines)
      From: SATX Soccer Ref <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 21:06:31 -0500
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (37 lines)
      From: AMPM <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 08:33:42 -0500
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (22 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 15:25:42 -0400
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (53 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 21:24:49 +0000
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (55 lines)
      From: SATX Soccer Ref <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:11:56 -0500
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (24 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:32:51 -0700
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (62 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:32:59 +0000
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (94 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:48:28 -0700
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (23 lines)
      From: Jonathan Gingerich <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:44:23 -0400
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (26 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 12:45:35 -0700
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (83 lines)
      From: SATX Soccer Ref <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 16:53:48 -0500
    • Re: Substitute or Reduce To Equate (30 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 15:19:14 -0700

16. those pesky players
    • those pesky players (15 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 16:25:34 -0700
    • Re: those pesky players (34 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 19:51:22 -0400
    • Re: those pesky players (60 lines)
      From: Kevin Burke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:45:07 -0500
    • Re: those pesky players (55 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:57:37 -0400
    • Re: those pesky players (72 lines)
      From: Brent Crossland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:33:17 -0500
    • Re: those pesky players (33 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 10:42:35 -0400
    • Re: those pesky players (60 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 11:51:43 -0400
    • Re: those pesky players (21 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:56:45 -0700
    • Re: those pesky players (33 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 13:04:05 -0400
    • Re: those pesky players (49 lines)
      From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:50:01 -0700

17. those pesky players and their salaries
    • those pesky players and their salaries (86 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 15:44:27 +0000

18. US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions?
    • US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (24 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 22:44:53 -0400
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (47 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 22:18:00 -0500
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (64 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 04:26:28 +0000
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (39 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 21:54:58 -0700
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (23 lines)
      From: Peter T Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 08:41:19 -0400
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (21 lines)
      From: Jam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 16:26:58 -0400
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (50 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 15:19:16 -0600
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (64 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:51:55 -0400
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (24 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 14:57:22 -0700
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (68 lines)
      From: Jack Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:31:05 -0700
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (41 lines)
      From: Jam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:00:02 -0400
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (76 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:45:23 +0000
    • Re: US vs China today -- What was going to generate 9 cautions? (69 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 13:49:53 -0400

19. USA vs China - Why so little publicity?
    • USA vs China - Why so little publicity? (27 lines)
      From: gary walker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 21:36:15 -0400

20. USA-China fouls
    • Re: USA-China fouls (24 lines)
      From: Doug Loudon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:40:44 -0700
    • Re: USA-China fouls (16 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 17:56:40 -0700

21.       Re: US vs China t oday -- What was going to generate 9 caut ions?
    • Re:       Re: US vs China t oday -- What was going to generate 9 caut ions? (21 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:45:09 EDT