SOCREF-L Archives – February 2005, week 3

1. AR POSITIONING
   • AR POSITIONING (30 lines)
     From: Wayne Pav <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:13:21 -0500
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (48 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:14:08 -0800
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (32 lines)
     From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:29:52 +0000
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (71 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:34:24 -0600
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (72 lines)
     From: Dan Cawley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:49:46 -0600
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (74 lines)
     From: Morten Mikkelsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:54:02 -0800
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (91 lines)
     From: Terry Carrington <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:25:05 -0500
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (108 lines)
     From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:05:18 -0800
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (32 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 20:06:33 -0800
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (42 lines)
     From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:34:25 -0800
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (61 lines)
     From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:57:48 -0800
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (34 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:15:31 -0500
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (116 lines)
     From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 14:28:43 -0600
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (62 lines)
     From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:55:57 +0000
   • Re: AR POSITIONING (111 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:33:13 -0500

2. Arsenal v Sheffield United (No result, but offside discussed)
   • Arsenal v Sheffield United (No result, but offside discussed) (13 lines)
     From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 07:04:34 EST
   • Re: Arsenal v Sheffield United (No result, but offside discussed) (24 lines)
     From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 08:14:42 -0700
   • Re: Arsenal v Sheffield United (No result, but offside discussed) (24 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:57:28 -0500

3. Background Checks
   • Background Checks (72 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:46:29 -0500
   • Re: Background Checks (86 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:44:04 -0500

4. Be aware of the possibilities
   • Be aware of the possibilities (85 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:22:55 -0500

5. Daddy needs a new pair of shoes...
   • Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (21 lines)
     From: Morten Mikkelsen <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:40:51 -0800
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (42 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:04:33 -0500
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (16 lines)
     From: Steve Coleman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:25:46 EST
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (59 lines)
     From: Warren Rust <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:45:20 -0500
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (38 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:49:07 -0800
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (48 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:19:26 -0500
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (27 lines)
     From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:50:36 -0800
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (14 lines)
     From: Jay Harlow <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 14:17:06 -0500
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (25 lines)
     From: Matt Jacob <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:46:58 -0700
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (38 lines)
     From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:12:59 -0800
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (23 lines)
     From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:20:54 -0800
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (41 lines)
     From: Caroline Lambert <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 10:39:39 -0800
   • Re: Daddy needs a new pair of shoes... (29 lines)
     From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:52:16 -0600

6. Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick
   • Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (31 lines)
     From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:36:24 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (90 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:35:24 -0800
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (26 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:36:27 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (55 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:17:55 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (13 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:37:14 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (16 lines)
     From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:48:12 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (58 lines)
     From: Kent Schwemmer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:43:30 -0600
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (89 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:57:33 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (123 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:48:06 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (215 lines)
     From: J. Michael McGee <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:09:20 -0500
   • Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (40 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:30:32 -0500

7. First assessment
   • First assessment (35 lines)
     From: S. Neill <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:49:56 -0500
   • Re: First assessment (96 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:16:38 -0800
   • Re: First assessment (40 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:18:35 -0500

8. First Time-Unusual Play
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (45 lines)
     From: Chip G. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:39:40 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (33 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:24:16 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (60 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:45:35 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (87 lines)
     From: Warren Rust <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 12:54:09 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (90 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:41:14 -0800
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (39 lines)
     From: Chip G. <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:23:39 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (17 lines)
     From: Frank Balantic <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:44:15 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (13 lines)
     From: Tom Walker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:01:05 -0500
   • Re: First Time-Unusual Play (21 lines)
     From: Warren Rust <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:09:27 -0500

9. FW: NY TIMES:A Soccer Superstar Prepares to Hang Up His Whistle
   • FW: NY TIMES:A Soccer Superstar Prepares to Hang Up His Whistle (170 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:44:38 -0500

10. Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom?
    • Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (24 lines)
      From: Steve Gralla <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:48:22 EST
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (39 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:02:04 -0500
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (84 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:42:44 -0800
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (123 lines)
      From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 22:00:14 -0700
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (31 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:02:05 EST
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (40 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:38:51 -0800
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (53 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:34:50 -0800
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (40 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:49:15 EST
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (51 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:49:15 -0500
    • Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (87 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:50:00 -0800

11. Interesting soccer comparisons
    • Interesting soccer comparisons (56 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:52:35 -0500
    • Re: Interesting soccer comparisons (25 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:32:57 EST

12. Interesting statistics
    • Interesting statistics (40 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 19:39:28 -0500

13. ny times article on collina
    • ny times article on collina (18 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:42:44 -0800

14. Off-field Misconduct
    • Off-field Misconduct (42 lines)
      From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:23:19 -0800
    • Re: Off-field Misconduct (51 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:04:00 -0500
    • Re: Off-field Misconduct (55 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:36:31 -0500
    • Re: Off-field Misconduct (38 lines)
      From: John Crown <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:18:36 -0800
    • Re: Off-field Misconduct (26 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:16:30 -0500
    • Re: Off-field Misconduct (64 lines)
      From: John Crown <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:11:49 -0800

15. Pay for SRA, SDI, SDRA
    • Re: Pay for SRA, SDI, SDRA (79 lines)
      From: J. Michael McGee <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:27:08 -0500

16. Photos of refs working 2004 HS finals
    • Photos of refs working 2004 HS finals (37 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:59:49 EST

17. red card
    • red card (53 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:40:47 -0500

18. Soccer books
    • Soccer books (61 lines)
      From: Peter Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:37:05 -0800

19. Two For One
    • Two For One (20 lines)
      From: John von Buelow <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:43:23 -0500
    • Re: Two For One (13 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:30:33 -0800
    • Re: Two For One (15 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:33:28 -0800
    • Re: Two For One (23 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:19:51 -0500
    • Re: Two For One (39 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:27:03 -0500

20. Two for one
    • Re: Two for one (40 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:29:20 +0000
    • Re: Two for one (66 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:54:03 -0500
    • Re: Two for one (45 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:57:39 +0000
    • Re: Two for one (30 lines)
      From: John Crown <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:27:45 -0800
    • Re: Two for one (43 lines)
      From: Patrick J. McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:36:19 EST
    • Re: Two for one (30 lines)
      From: Bill Faucett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:42:30 +0000
    • Re: Two for one (55 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:35:14 -0600
    • Re: Two for one (69 lines)
      From: John Crown <[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:49:49 -0800
    • Re: Two for one (29 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:07:51 -0500
    • Re: Two for one (81 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:09:51 -0500
    • Re: Two for one (25 lines)
      From: lsavell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:11:26 -0800
    • Re: Two for one (105 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:35:16 -0500
    • Re: Two for one (25 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 00:49:48 -0500

21. what do you say?
    • what do you say? (36 lines)
      From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:12:44 -0500
    • Re: what do you say? (65 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:35:11 -0800
    • Re: what do you say? (35 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:45:55 -0500
    • Re: what do you say? (57 lines)
      From: Shawn Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:54:49 -0600

22. [UBE?] Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick
    • [UBE?] Re: Ethics Question Referee or Assignor you pick (32 lines)
      From: Philip Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:15:06 -0500

23. [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom?
    • [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (48 lines)
      From: Philip Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:03:29 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (45 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:32:45 -0600
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (22 lines)
      From: Chip G. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:24:14 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:59:34 EST

24. [UBE?] Re: Re: Two for one
    • [UBE?] Re: Re: Two for one (51 lines)
      From: Philip Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:24:44 -0500

25. [UBE?] Re: Re: [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom?
    • [UBE?] Re: Re: [UBE?] Re: Re: Hand Ball by Who? or is it Whom? (56 lines)
      From: Philip Rogers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:04:25 -0500

26.       Re: First Time-Unusua l Play-cps
    • Re:       Re: First Time-Unusua l Play-cps (26 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:26:18 EST

27.       Re: Two for one-her e's what we do improperly
    • Re:       Re: Two for one-her e's what we do improperly (45 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:54:10 EST