SOCREF-L Archives – November 2005, week 1

1. a mountain out of . . . ?
   • a mountain out of . . . ? (47 lines)
     From: Brent Crossland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:55:40 -0600
   • Re: a mountain out of . . . ? (54 lines)
     From: Mike Hayford <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:36:49 -0800
   • Re: a mountain out of . . . ? (52 lines)
     From: Jeff Caminsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:34:14 -0500

2. a mountain out of . . . ?-my second ditto in a week
   • Re: a mountain out of . . . ?-my second ditto in a week (28 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:19:48 EST

3. Advantage in defendin third
   • Advantage in defendin third (46 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:08:46 -0500

4. Aonther defender inside the goal question
   • Aonther defender inside the goal question (16 lines)
     From: Mark Fellows <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:34:36 -0800
   • Re: Aonther defender inside the goal question (24 lines)
     From: Mark Goorsky <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:08:49 -0800

5. beating the pass back to death...almost
   • beating the pass back to death...almost (36 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 01:03:58 EST
   • Re: beating the pass back to death...almost (50 lines)
     From: Conrad A. Thomaier <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:24:01 -0700

6. Bite my Offside....
   • Bite my Offside.... (86 lines)
     From: DOUG WIGGINS <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 00:56:33 -0800
   • Re: Bite my Offside.... (93 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 07:36:26 -0500
   • Re: Bite my Offside.... (127 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:20:44 -0800

7. Bite my....
   • Bite my.... (66 lines)
     From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:30:57 -0500

8. Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma
   • Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (104 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:59:07 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (146 lines)
     From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 16:32:15 -0000
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (29 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:45:30 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (29 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:45:24 -0600
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (14 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:11:14 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (23 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:14:11 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (28 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 18:06:05 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (31 lines)
     From: Steve Bunten <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 02:49:13 -0000
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (18 lines)
     From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:29:14 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (134 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:00:44 -0500
   • Re: Checking in from South Florida -- Aftermath of Wilma (70 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 12:30:44 -0500

9. Criticism of referees in public/private???
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (34 lines)
     From: phil rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 00:04:10 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (32 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:53:51 EST
   • Criticism of referees in public/private??? (55 lines)
     From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 07:08:04 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (63 lines)
     From: Brent Crossland <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:35:51 -0600
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (64 lines)
     From: phil rogers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:33:08 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (30 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:57:30 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (35 lines)
     From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:28:43 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (23 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 06:58:14 -0800
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (28 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:38:47 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (29 lines)
     From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:05:43 -0700
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (32 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:12:04 -0800
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (65 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:20:33 -0800
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (120 lines)
     From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:57:14 +0000
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (176 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:59:02 -0800
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (83 lines)
     From: Ken W Smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:48:11 -0500
   • Re: Criticism of referees in public/private??? (77 lines)
     From: tom marlin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:39:33 -0800

10. Defender inside goal
    • Defender inside goal (43 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:03:42 -0500
    • Re: Defender inside goal (65 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:50:58 -0600
    • Re: Defender inside goal (39 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:04:36 -0800
    • Re: Defender inside goal (106 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:42:56 -0800
    • Re: Defender inside goal (97 lines)
      From: Brent Crossland <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:20:34 -0600
    • Re: Defender inside goal (69 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:52:11 -0600

11. Defender:
    • Defender: (20 lines)
      From: Carl Neighbors <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:02:41 -0500
    • Re: Defender: (24 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:09:46 -0500
    • Re: Defender: (43 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:29:29 -0500
    • Re: Defender: (70 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:39:21 -0600
    • Re: Defender: (30 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:17:20 EST
    • Re: Defender: (24 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 04:52:29 -0600

12. Do they just make these up?????
    • Re: Do they just make these up????? (21 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:15:52 -0800

13. Fwd: New list settings
    • Fwd: New list settings (23 lines)
      From: Mark Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:24:51 -0500

14. Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but...
    • Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (36 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:35:39 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (21 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:45:51 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (34 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:45:51 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (77 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:59:51 -0800
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (70 lines)
      From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:10:59 -0700
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (77 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:04:30 -0800
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (50 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:57:10 -0600
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (92 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:04:28 -0800
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (75 lines)
      From: Tom Lamm <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:38:57 +0000
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (33 lines)
      From: Jason Currie <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:45:48 -0800
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (22 lines)
      From: Lin Lipinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:52:14 EST
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (98 lines)
      From: Ken W Smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:21:04 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (12 lines)
      From: Kevin Watts <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:44:44 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (24 lines)
      From: Wanker I. Black <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:56:04 +0000
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (29 lines)
      From: Lin Lipinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:27:42 EST
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (55 lines)
      From: Draper's <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:52:56 -0800
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (28 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 21:15:45 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (20 lines)
      From: Jeff Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:41:11 -0800
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (30 lines)
      From: David Carter <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:15:19 -0500
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (31 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:14:51 -0600
    • Re: Gee, Ref, I hate to complain but... (44 lines)
      From: Robert Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 22:34:11 -0600

15. gee,ref,I hate to complain, but...
    • Re: gee,ref,I hate to complain, but... (20 lines)
      From: chester miller <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:56:10 -0500

16. Grade 9's
    • Grade 9's (23 lines)
      From: Jim DeBrabander <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:27:12 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (39 lines)
      From: Jeff Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:56:36 -0400
    • Re: Grade 9's (29 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:40:17 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (42 lines)
      From: John Wagner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:46:23 -0600
    • Re: Grade 9's (54 lines)
      From: Mark Fellows <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:58:31 -0800
    • Re: Grade 9's (39 lines)
      From: Curt Hamlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:53:57 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (40 lines)
      From: Ferenc & Sandy Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:04:26 -0600
    • Re: Grade 9's (54 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:09:34 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (28 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:39:59 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (38 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:08:15 -0800
    • Re: Grade 9's (24 lines)
      From: Jeff Johnson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:38:32 -0800
    • Re: Grade 9's (36 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:13:58 -0700
    • Re: Grade 9's (57 lines)
      From: les baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:00:13 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (44 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:28:05 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (59 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:36:27 -0800
    • Re: Grade 9's (28 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 15:05:37 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (45 lines)
      From: Steve G <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:08:29 -0500
    • Re: Grade 9's (46 lines)
      From: Dana Wharton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 17:40:42 -0500

17. Grade 9's-child labor laws.
    • Re: Grade 9's-child labor laws. (85 lines)
      From: David and Michele Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 15:33:54 -0500

18. Hampton Teen Dies During Youth Soccer Tournament
    • Hampton Teen Dies During Youth Soccer Tournament (125 lines)
      From: Donohoe, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:30:06 -0500
    • Re: Hampton Teen Dies During Youth Soccer Tournament (17 lines)
      From: J. Michael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:42:30 -0500

19. Hurricane Wilma photos -- my neighborhood
    • Hurricane Wilma photos -- my neighborhood (43 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:01:10 -0700

20. Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area?
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (37 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:05:25 -0500
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (25 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 08:57:49 -0700
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (65 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:10:17 EST
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (28 lines)
      From: Lin Lipinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:36:15 EST
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (44 lines)
      From: Kevin Druff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:46:15 -0500
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (36 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:56:12 -0500
    • Re: Is it unfair to give Advantage in the Penalty Area? (35 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:25:54 +0000

21. Lessons from a failed assessment
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (131 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:08:33 -0800

22. Lessons from a failed assessment (long post)
    • Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (189 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:00:51 -0800
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (207 lines)
      From: Draper's <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 19:59:02 -0800
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (235 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 00:12:52 -0500
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (58 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:11:44 -0500
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (73 lines)
      From: Thomas Ryer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:26:56 -0600
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (37 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:52:24 EST
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (56 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:54:05 -0600
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (44 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 07:25:09 -0800
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (56 lines)
      From: Glenn Schwartzberg <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 08:13:48 -0800
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (81 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:44:21 -0800
    • Re: Lessons from a failed assessment (long post) (27 lines)
      From: Keith Gendler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:36:10 -0800

23. NO SOCCER: RFC-822 (was Slight Change to List)
    • NO SOCCER: RFC-822 (was Slight Change to List) (60 lines)
      From: Peter T Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:27:04 -0500

24. offside confusion is a dummy a play = to a touch?
    • offside confusion is a dummy a play = to a touch? (120 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 23:35:37 -0500
    • Re: offside confusion is a dummy a play = to a touch? (148 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 10:20:49 -0800
    • Re: offside confusion is a dummy a play = to a touch? (22 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:51:50 -0500

25. Oh, those announcers
    • Oh, those announcers (68 lines)
      From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 22:28:02 -0500
    • Re: Oh, those announcers (45 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:55:06 -0800
    • Re: Oh, those announcers (22 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 21:05:05 -0800
    • Re: Oh, those announcers (29 lines)
      From: Steven Hill <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 05:22:20 -0500
    • Re: Oh, those announcers (35 lines)
      From: Keith Gendler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:55:48 -0800
    • Re: Oh, those announcers (51 lines)
      From: Jim Wharton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:46:37 -0800
    • Re: Oh, those announcers (64 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:20:27 -0800

26. Revolution-Fire (results implied)
    • Revolution-Fire (results implied) (63 lines)
      From: Reddy, Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:41:35 -0500
    • Re: Revolution-Fire (results implied) (29 lines)
      From: Lin Lipinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:04:45 EST
    • Re: Revolution-Fire (results implied) (43 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:29:07 -0800

27. Revs-Chicago
    • Revs-Chicago (19 lines)
      From: John L. Magnusson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:30:20 -0500

28. Slight Change to List
    • Slight Change to List (26 lines)
      From: Mark Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:09:01 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (40 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:15:25 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List (58 lines)
      From: Doug Gentry <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:28:13 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List (44 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:32:48 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (26 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:35:02 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (26 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:35:44 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (60 lines)
      From: Peter T Murphy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:41:10 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (19 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:45:50 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (34 lines)
      From: Jeff Knoll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:54:09 -0600
    • Re: Slight Change to List (57 lines)
      From: Shawn Carroll <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:03:44 -0600
    • Re: Slight Change to List (42 lines)
      From: Dave Young <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:21:27 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (70 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:26:42 -0600
    • Re: Slight Change to List (43 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:40:25 -0600
    • Re: Slight Change to List (83 lines)
      From: Mark Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:12:34 -0500
    • Re: Slight Change to List (57 lines)
      From: Draper's <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:52:15 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List (69 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:55:58 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List (58 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:59:06 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List (34 lines)
      From: David Bassett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:00:25 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List (48 lines)
      From: Boerio, Jeff <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:04:51 -0800

29. Slight Change to List-ditto
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (19 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:46:19 EST
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (14 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:55:53 EST
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (28 lines)
      From: Gwen Keck <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:59:18 -0700
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (32 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:14:47 -0600
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (46 lines)
      From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:33:08 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (12 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:45:07 -0800
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto (21 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:00:08 -0800

30. Slight Change to List-ditto dot dash
    • Re: Slight Change to List-ditto dot dash (33 lines)
      From: Eric Emery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:31:14 -0800

31. SOCREF-L Digest - 30 Oct 2005 to 31 Oct 2005 (#2005-301)
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 30 Oct 2005 to 31 Oct 2005 (#2005-301) (59 lines)
      From: Burke, Rick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:23:16 -0800

32. Tapping the ball into play
    • Re: Tapping the ball into play (47 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:23:38 -0800

33. The Votes are In (Voting on Replies)
    • The Votes are In (Voting on Replies) (35 lines)
      From: Mark Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:13:14 -0500
    • Re: The Votes are In (Voting on Replies) (51 lines)
      From: Josef Zeevi <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:22:42 -0600
    • Re: The Votes are In (Voting on Replies) (24 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:33:29 -0500
    • Re: The Votes are In (Voting on Replies) (49 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:47:46 -0600

34. Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion
    • Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (53 lines)
      From: Jim Wharton <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:21:08 -0800
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (75 lines)
      From: David Bassett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:51:58 -0800
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (70 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 00:04:56 -0600
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (48 lines)
      From: Lee Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:11:24 -0800
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (65 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 22:42:57 -0800
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (82 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 02:13:34 -0500
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (52 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 06:41:52 -0500
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (71 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 06:51:19 -0500
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (62 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:36:55 -0500
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (45 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:37:16 EST
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (31 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:49:53 -0500
    • Re: Touched vs. Played - offside law confusion (66 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:47:10 -0500

35. Unusual GK charging / possession situation - SURPRISING ANSWER FROM J.A.
    • Unusual GK charging / possession situation - SURPRISING ANSWER FROM J.A. (34 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:24:35 -0500
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - SURPRISING ANSWER FROM J.A. (42 lines)
      From: Mark Wroth <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:31:27 -0800

36. Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ?
    • Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (44 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:02:49 -0500
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (76 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:49:02 -0600
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (117 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:57:33 -0800
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (138 lines)
      From: Valone, Toren W. <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:24:09 -0800
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (34 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:47:04 -0800
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 02:28:36 -0500
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (19 lines)
      From: The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 06:21:42 -0800
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (46 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 08:52:37 -0600
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (33 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:13:39 -0500
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (23 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:22:48 -0500
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (22 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:05:06 -0500
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (25 lines)
      From: Lin Lipinski <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:23:42 EST
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (41 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:49:25 -0800
    • Re: Unusual GK charging / possession situation - what's the call ? (47 lines)
      From: Robert Anderson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 20:27:56 -0600

37. Voting for Reply Setting
    • Voting for Reply Setting (29 lines)
      From: Mark Oliver <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:13:51 -0500
    • Re: Voting for Reply Setting (38 lines)
      From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:52:29 -0800
    • Re: Voting for Reply Setting (52 lines)
      From: David Bassett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 07:58:42 -0800
    • Re: Voting for Reply Setting (61 lines)
      From: John Eyre <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:03:21 -0800
    • Re: Voting for Reply Setting (25 lines)
      From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:38:46 -0800
    • Re: Voting for Reply Setting (42 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:53:41 -0500

38. Welcome to a new pseudonym
    • Welcome to a new pseudonym (55 lines)
      From: Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 21:30:17 -0600
    • Re: Welcome to a new pseudonym (33 lines)
      From: Wanker I. Black <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:52:55 +0000
    • Re: Welcome to a new pseudonym (29 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:42:44 -0500

39. What, no ref?
    • What, no ref? (43 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:32:01 -0500
    • Re: What, no ref? (57 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:24:06 -0500

40. Where's the balancing point?
    • Where's the balancing point? (48 lines)
      From: Ralph Bigio <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:44:47 -0500

41. While we're beating the pass back to death...
    • While we're beating the pass back to death... (33 lines)
      From: Conrad A. Thomaier <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:28:38 -0700
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (56 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:50:51 -0600
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (82 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:01:43 -0800
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (117 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:16:41 -0500
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (38 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 15:44:14 -0500
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (55 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 17:49:13 -0800
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (35 lines)
      From: Wanker I. Black <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 02:53:16 +0000
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (29 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:20:39 -0700
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (48 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 06:29:56 -0800
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (45 lines)
      From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:15:37 -0500
    • Re: While we're beating the pass back to death... (36 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:00:17 -0800
    • While we're beating the pass back to death... (33 lines)
      From: ront02769 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 18:18:58 -0500