SOCREF-L Archives – March 2009, week 2

1. "Whistle!!"
   • "Whistle!!" (22 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:17:00 -0500
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (54 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:39:46 -0500
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (67 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:58:58 +0000
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (50 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:26:08 -0500
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (26 lines)
     From: Rich Torquato <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:41:58 -0700
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (18 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:07:42 -0400
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (41 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:13:13 -0700
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (57 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:01:08 -0700
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (39 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:36:00 -0700
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (23 lines)
     From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:18:58 -0700
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (52 lines)
     From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 07:11:54 -0400
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (49 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:40:54 -0400
   • Re: "Whistle!!" (65 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:28:34 -0700

2. 100 % misconduct
   • 100 % misconduct (22 lines)
     From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:56:27 -0400
   • Re: 100 % misconduct (38 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:08:50 -0700
   • Re: 100 % misconduct (48 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:12:48 -0400
   • Re: 100 % misconduct (43 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 14:13:32 -0700
   • Re: 100 % misconduct (17 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:40:05 -0500

3. 100% misconduct
   • 100% misconduct (52 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:42:44 -0700
   • Re: 100% misconduct (18 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 17:17:15 -0400

4. 2009 USSF Directive - 'Free Kick and Restart Management'
   • 2009 USSF Directive - 'Free Kick and Restart Management' (23 lines)
     From: Donn Milton <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:53:43 -0500
   • Re: 2009 USSF Directive - 'Free Kick and Restart Management' (90 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:05:43 +0000
   • Re: 2009 USSF Directive - 'Free Kick and Restart Management' (63 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:22:07 -0400

5. 2009 USSF Directives
   • Re: 2009 USSF Directives (36 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:07:56 -0700
   • Re: 2009 USSF Directives (58 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:48:03 -0400
   • Re: 2009 USSF Directives (61 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:17:18 -0700
   • Re: 2009 USSF Directives (86 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:37:10 -0400

6. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (23 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:57:08 -0400

7. a thousand tackles
   • a thousand tackles (52 lines)
     From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:02:47 -0700
   • Re: a thousand tackles (91 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:57:44 -0700
   • Re: a thousand tackles (75 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:46:22 -0700
   • Re: a thousand tackles (21 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:14:41 -0700
   • Re: a thousand tackles (62 lines)
     From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:23:02 -0500

8. AR Positioning at a Throw- In Inside the Attacking Third
   • Re: AR Positioning at a Throw- In Inside the Attacking Third (83 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:37:55 -0700
   • Re: AR Positioning at a Throw- In Inside the Attacking Third (108 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:08:26 -0400
   • Re: AR Positioning at a Throw- In Inside the Attacking Third (21 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:38:25 -0700

9. Can You?? (Old and new-young and pro)
   • Re: Can You?? (Old and new-young and pro) (68 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:29:06 -0400
   • Re: Can You?? (Old and new-young and pro) (33 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:52:40 -0700

10. Can You?? (Original Thread), plus a little
    • Re: Can You?? (Original Thread), plus a little (67 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:59:45 -0600

11. Card - assigning horror
    • Re: Card - assigning horror (33 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:50:19 -0400
    • Re: Card - assigning horror (42 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:26:24 -0500

12. Card or Quick Restart?
    • Card or Quick Restart? (40 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:50:09 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (41 lines)
      From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:54:10 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (56 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:28:04 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (77 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:15:39 -0700
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (29 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:19:13 -0500
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (29 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:34:07 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (58 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:49:15 -0700
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (40 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:10:01 -0500
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (106 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:17:06 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (28 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:41:38 -0500
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (54 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:46:12 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (32 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:47:47 -0500
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (33 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:56:58 -0700
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (72 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:13:17 +0000
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (93 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:16:33 +0000
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (71 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:54:42 -0700
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart? (78 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:41:44 -0400
    • Card or Quick Restart? (37 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:39:48 -0400
    • Card or Quick Restart? (65 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:47:56 -0400

13. Card or Quick Restart?-copyright material
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart?-copyright material (123 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:05:07 -0400
    • Re: Card or Quick Restart?-copyright material (69 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:31:33 -0700

14. College Basketball Compensation
    • College Basketball Compensation (20 lines)
      From: Roger Domal <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:56:12 -0400

15. Everton vs. Stoke (no score)
    • Everton vs. Stoke (no score) (18 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:33:06 -0700
    • Re: Everton vs. Stoke (no score) (42 lines)
      From: Michael Haskins <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:46:55 -0500

16. Everton vs. Stoke (no score) -- hair beads
    • Re: Everton vs. Stoke (no score) -- hair beads (56 lines)
      From: Mike Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 12:53:34 -0400

17. for the want of a tied lace
    • for the want of a tied lace (24 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:30:08 -0500
    • Re: for the want of a tied lace (29 lines)
      From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:21:35 -0500
    • Re: for the want of a tied lace (47 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:51:01 -0500

18. I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing.
    • I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (43 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:22:46 -0500
    • Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (101 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:49:04 -0400
    • Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (122 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:20:11 -0700
    • Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (62 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:58:49 +0000
    • Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (163 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:39:53 -0700

19. learning Law 11 (Was: Re: Speaking of David Albany, et. al....)
    • learning Law 11 (Was: Re: Speaking of David Albany, et. al....) (74 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:34:58 +0000

20. Liverpool v Real Madrid - question
    • Liverpool v Real Madrid - question (44 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:21:20 -0500
    • Re: Liverpool v Real Madrid - question (23 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:54:29 -0400
    • Re: Liverpool v Real Madrid - question (66 lines)
      From: Spencer Ford <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:09:38 -0400

21. Mandatory mouthguards
    • Mandatory mouthguards (31 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:00:21 -0400
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (18 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:26:44 -0400
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (47 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:28:08 -0700
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (57 lines)
      From: Joshua Boylan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 13:53:53 -0400
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (26 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:25:25 -0500
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (57 lines)
      From: David Ebenstein <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:38:05 -0400
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (27 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:00:01 EDT
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (35 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:48:59 -0500
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (43 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:43:09 -0700
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (12 lines)
      From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:17:37 -0400
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (25 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:20:57 -0700
    • Re: Mandatory mouthguards (34 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:10:36 -0400

22. Match management or skullduggery
    • Match management or skullduggery (62 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:06:50 -0700
    • Re: Match management or skullduggery (24 lines)
      From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:25:16 -0400

23. NFHS Sportsmanship Statement
    • NFHS Sportsmanship Statement (35 lines)
      From: ront <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 00:04:57 -0500
    • Re: NFHS Sportsmanship Statement (35 lines)
      From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:36:32 -0700

24. Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site
    • Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site (117 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:16:37 -0400
    • Re: Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site (81 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:57:44 -0500
    • Re: Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site (113 lines)
      From: Gary Stephens <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 22:29:25 -0500
    • Re: Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site (57 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:22:23 -0700
    • Re: Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site (83 lines)
      From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 00:56:05 -0400
    • Re: Questions regarding The Arbiter assigning web site (66 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:01:36 -0500

25. Running to the line after a signal (WAS I'd heard about this procedure)
    • Running to the line after a signal (WAS I'd heard about this procedure) (76 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:38:19 -0500
    • Re: Running to the line after a signal (WAS I'd heard about this procedure) (86 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:55:55 -0400
    • Re: Running to the line after a signal (WAS I'd heard about this procedure) (102 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:35:44 -0700
    • Re: Running to the line after a signal (WAS I'd heard about this procedure) (59 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:09:44 +0000

26. Speaking of David Albany, et. al....
    • Re: Speaking of David Albany, et. al.... (21 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 16:41:02 -0400

27. unsubscribe
    • unsubscribe (22 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:08:12 -0400

28. Why Soccer is Ruining America
    • Why Soccer is Ruining America (23 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:46:14 -0400
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (31 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:05:28 -0400
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (23 lines)
      From: Sean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:24:14 -0400
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (65 lines)
      From: Paul Gray <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:07:49 -0500
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (44 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:04:33 -0400
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (65 lines)
      From: k kampe, iii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:22:14 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (78 lines)
      From: k kampe, iii <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:29:59 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (76 lines)
      From: Jim Welnetz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:56:43 -0500
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (108 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:36:02 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (117 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:58:58 EDT
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (40 lines)
      From: Mark Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:07:10 +1100
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (124 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:11:41 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (126 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:35:19 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (30 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:27:39 -0400
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (57 lines)
      From: William Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:22:22 -0500
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (50 lines)
      From: Glenn R Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:33:23 -0500
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (70 lines)
      From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:07:19 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (134 lines)
      From: Keith Powell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:41:16 EDT
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (153 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:09:24 -0700
    • Re: Why Soccer is Ruining America (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:48:14 -0400

29. [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing.
    • [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (26 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:22:27 -0400
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (45 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:29:02 -0700
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (53 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:10:54 +0000
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (43 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:17:26 -0500
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (45 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:25:49 -0700
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (55 lines)
      From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:47:44 -0400
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (96 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:10:50 -0700
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (26 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:26:26 -0700
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (52 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:34:58 -0700
    • Re: [UBE?] Re: I'd heard about this procedure, now I see it in writing. (34 lines)
      From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:19:10 -0400