SOCREF-L Archives – October 2009, week 3

1. "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)"
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (31 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 10:16:19 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (58 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:29:48 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (23 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:12:18 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (118 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:11:56 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (25 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:19:52 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (58 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:40:28 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (58 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:52:40 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (33 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:07:33 -0500
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (35 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:16:07 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (44 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:33:25 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (42 lines)
     From: Steve Meyers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:24:19 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (37 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:11:02 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (39 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:48:57 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (37 lines)
     From: Andrew Ashmall-Liversidge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:06:08 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (62 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:20:15 -0500
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (71 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:46:59 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (21 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:19:29 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (95 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:36:14 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (86 lines)
     From: Steve Meyers <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:46:48 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (94 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 11:55:07 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (110 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:39:27 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (132 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:50:46 -0500
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (141 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:59:08 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (139 lines)
     From: Michael I. Handler <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:01:36 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (196 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:09:33 +0000
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (22 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:58:51 -0400
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (36 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:22:30 -0500
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (29 lines)
     From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:26:12 -0600
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (144 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:19:50 -0700
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (42 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:36:48 -0500
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (188 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:39:52 -0500
   • Re: "Red Card For Faking Footballers (Soccer Players)" (48 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:56:59 -0700

2. Assigning software, 2009
   • Assigning software, 2009 (52 lines)
     From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:50:50 -0600
   • Re: Assigning software, 2009 (77 lines)
     From: Greg Dunlap <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:34:41 -0700
   • Re: Assigning software, 2009 (20 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:56:14 -0700

3. Bell rung Dinger
   • Bell rung Dinger (170 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:30:43 -0400
   • Re: Bell rung Dinger (206 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:59:10 -0500
   • Re: Bell rung Dinger (22 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:18:02 -0400

4. Coach Verbal Abuse of Own Players - THE GOOD KIND
   • Coach Verbal Abuse of Own Players - THE GOOD KIND (57 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:32:27 -0400

5. Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux
   • Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (67 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:00:19 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (43 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:22:40 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (93 lines)
     From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:24:12 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (100 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:49:44 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (119 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:20:26 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (112 lines)
     From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:57:27 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (35 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:21:14 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (51 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:21:41 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (18 lines)
     From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:43:22 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (36 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:56:17 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (49 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:01:55 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (44 lines)
     From: JvBucko <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:09:22 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (90 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:49:34 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (71 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:00:27 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (56 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 06:18:42 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (92 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:34:47 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (73 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:54:44 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (54 lines)
     From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:26:08 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (79 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:48:13 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (96 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:23:23 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (88 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:33:47 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (19 lines)
     From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:36:40 EDT
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (111 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:43:46 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (92 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:51:17 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (108 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:15:50 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (42 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:28:36 -0500
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (91 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:50:48 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (59 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:02:27 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (43 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:03:10 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (170 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:01:38 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (29 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:24:36 -0500
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (51 lines)
     From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:01:23 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (235 lines)
     From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:48:12 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (56 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:50:09 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (70 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:29:55 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (49 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:04:33 -0400
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (135 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:31:52 -0700
   • Re: Coach Verbally Abusing Own Player - Redaux (47 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:09:24 -0500

6. Eastwood
   • Eastwood (16 lines)
     From: laurent thomas <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:52:53 -0700
   • Re: Eastwood (26 lines)
     From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:53:43 -0700

7. flag protocol
   • flag protocol (20 lines)
     From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 09:41:28 -0400
   • Re: flag protocol (31 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:17:57 -0700
   • Re: flag protocol (35 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:21:01 -0700
   • Re: flag protocol (40 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:06:53 -0500
   • Re: flag protocol (46 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:22:44 -0700
   • Re: flag protocol (38 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:07:59 -0700
   • Re: flag protocol (61 lines)
     From: Peter S. Goldberger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:07:05 -0400
   • Re: flag protocol (50 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:45:26 -0700
   • Re: flag protocol (55 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:15:01 +0000
   • Re: flag protocol (82 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:37:27 -0700
   • Re: flag protocol (106 lines)
     From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:23:27 -0400

8. Haunted By Unauthorized Signals
   • Re: Haunted By Unauthorized Signals (39 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:13:52 -0700
   • Re: Haunted By Unauthorized Signals (119 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:08:09 -0700

9. horrible challenge -- 100% send off? Not in tonight's MLS game
   • horrible challenge -- 100% send off? Not in tonight's MLS game (34 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:06:32 -0400
   • Re: horrible challenge -- 100% send off? Not in tonight's MLS game (18 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:36:04 -0400
   • Re: horrible challenge -- 100% send off? Not in tonight's MLS game (40 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:13:19 -0700

10. Houston vs LA Galaxy today
    • Houston vs LA Galaxy today (15 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:23:21 -0700
    • Re: Houston vs LA Galaxy today (24 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:18:17 -0400

11. Is the MLS season too long?????
    • Is the MLS season too long????? (50 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:19:44 -0400
    • Re: Is the MLS season too long????? (42 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:50:57 -0700

12. Lightning in Youth Matches
    • Lightning in Youth Matches (18 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:55:52 -0700
    • Re: Lightning in Youth Matches (23 lines)
      From: Peter Rye <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:02:42 -0700
    • Re: Lightning in Youth Matches (55 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:22:57 -0400
    • Re: Lightning in Youth Matches (32 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:22:41 -0400
    • Re: Lightning in Youth Matches (54 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:34:12 -0500
    • Re: Lightning in Youth Matches (35 lines)
      From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:19:14 -0500
    • Re: Lightning in Youth Matches (23 lines)
      From: Jeff Benjamin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:57:35 -0600

13. liverpool v sunderland incident
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (179 lines)
      From: Jonny (AYSO Los Angeles) <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:10:32 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (14 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:59:42 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (29 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:10:33 -0700
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (21 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:01:42 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (16 lines)
      From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:20:10 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (36 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:53:37 -0700

14. liverpool v sunderland incident (no score)
    • liverpool v sunderland incident (no score) (20 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:38:11 -0700
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score) (33 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:14:23 -0700
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score) (29 lines)
      From: Doug Campbell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:54:07 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score) (55 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:47:47 -0400

15. liverpool v sunderland incident (no score, but describes one score)
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score, but describes one score) (50 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:49:38 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score, but describes one score) (14 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:56:57 -0400
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score, but describes one score) (29 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:05:50 -0700
    • Re: liverpool v sunderland incident (no score, but describes one score) (59 lines)
      From: Thomas Coatoam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:32:39 -0400

16. Noda Whistle
    • Re: Noda Whistle (54 lines)
      From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 23:45:23 -0700

17. Pyramid effect and being Proactive
    • Pyramid effect and being Proactive (85 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:51:13 -0400
    • Re: Pyramid effect and being Proactive (55 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:58:45 -0400

18. Pyramid effect and being Proactive (follow-up)
    • Re: Pyramid effect and being Proactive (follow-up) (55 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:34:45 -0400

19. Real Madrid AC Milan (no score)
    • Real Madrid AC Milan (no score) (15 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:52:36 -0400
    • Re: Real Madrid AC Milan (no score) (25 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:58:19 -0700

20. Reminders for NISOA college referees
    • Reminders for NISOA college referees (64 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:38:42 -0400

21. saturday's barcelona game
    • saturday's barcelona game (21 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:34:38 -0700
    • Re: saturday's barcelona game (34 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:57:25 -0700
    • Re: saturday's barcelona game (41 lines)
      From: Steve Meyers <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:41:54 -0400

22. The 2 by 4 (was: Coach Verbally Abusing ...) (non-soccer, non-ref)
    • The 2 by 4 (was: Coach Verbally Abusing ...) (non-soccer, non-ref) (27 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:48:11 -0400
    • Re: The 2 by 4 (was: Coach Verbally Abusing ...) (non-soccer, non-ref) (55 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:55:23 -0400
    • Re: The 2 by 4 (was: Coach Verbally Abusing ...) (non-soccer, non-ref) (76 lines)
      From: Foerster Michael <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:56:56 -0400
    • Re: The 2 by 4 (was: Coach Verbally Abusing ...) (non-soccer, non-ref) (90 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:32:08 -0400
    • Re: The 2 by 4 (was: Coach Verbally Abusing ...) (non-soccer, non-ref) (27 lines)
      From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:29:48 -0700

23. USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (60 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:13:42 -0700
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (88 lines)
      From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:33:21 -0700
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (27 lines)
      From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:54:46 -0400
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (33 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:56:27 -0500
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (49 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:59:55 -0700
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (33 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:29:16 -0700
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (23 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:46:17 -0700
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (39 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:26:25 -0500
    • Re: USA-Costa Rica: no results, but significant events discussed (29 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:15:03 -0400

24. Who gets the last word?
    • Who gets the last word? (41 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:37:26 -0400
    • Re: Who gets the last word? (37 lines)
      From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:38:09 -0400
    • Re: Who gets the last word? (67 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:08:40 -0700

25. [SOCREF]Re: Pyramid effect and being Proactive
    • Re: [SOCREF]Re: Pyramid effect and being Proactive (58 lines)
      From: J.E. McGimpsey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:42:13 -0700
    • Re: [SOCREF]Re: Pyramid effect and being Proactive (26 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:59:08 -0500
    • Re: [SOCREF]Re: Pyramid effect and being Proactive (103 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:21:50 -0400