SOCREF-L Archives – November 2009, week 1

1. 2009/10 ATR Section 11.4 and 11.5-yes to 1978
   • Re: 2009/10 ATR Section 11.4 and 11.5-yes to 1978 (22 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:06:06 -0500
   • Re: 2009/10 ATR Section 11.4 and 11.5-yes to 1978 (32 lines)
     From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:01:09 -0500

2. <No subject>
   • <No subject> (32 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 23:54:17 +0000
   • <No subject> (46 lines)
     From: Bill Noyes <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:57:32 -0800
   • <No subject> (58 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:31:38 -0600
   • <No subject> (30 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 22:59:59 -0500
   • <No subject> (33 lines)
     From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:00:14 +0000

3. A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer
   • A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (67 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:06:47 -0500
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (110 lines)
     From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:41:51 -0600
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (87 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:50:36 -0500
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (112 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:23:37 -0800
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (124 lines)
     From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:34:20 -0800
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (28 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:03:00 -0600
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (37 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:17:23 -0500
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (90 lines)
     From: Ian Tooze <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:59:43 -0800
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (180 lines)
     From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 09:51:37 -0800
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (23 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:13:38 -0800
   • Re: A Brazilian coach's view of coaching/reffing soccer (195 lines)
     From: Art Kaufmann <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:14:35 -0800

4. BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight
   • BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight (15 lines)
     From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:58:15 -0500
   • Re: BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight (41 lines)
     From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:06:25 -0800
   • Re: BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight (46 lines)
     From: Horton, Stephen S (US SSA) <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:13:11 -0500
   • Re: BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight (65 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:13:57 -0800
   • Re: BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight (15 lines)
     From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 22:34:14 -0500
   • Re: BYU and New Mexico womens soccer fight (31 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:43:16 -0800

5. Celebration Rule in HS Football
   • Celebration Rule in HS Football (20 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 01:22:21 +0000
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (40 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 19:46:28 -0600
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (68 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:48:52 -0800
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (86 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:09:45 -0500
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (118 lines)
     From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 06:32:39 -0800
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (50 lines)
     From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:38:55 -0800
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (137 lines)
     From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:48:16 -0500
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (180 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:37:11 -0800
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (84 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:59:38 -0500
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (158 lines)
     From: [log in to unmask]
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:05:10 -0500
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (167 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:15:50 -0800
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (140 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:21:49 -0800
   • Re: Celebration Rule in HS Football (182 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:53:47 -0800

6. Comic
   • Comic (16 lines)
     From: Mike Moore <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:54:06 -0500
   • Re: Comic (31 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:21:57 -0800
   • Re: Comic (69 lines)
     From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:50:17 -0800

7. foul called without knowing direction
   • foul called without knowing direction (26 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 16:55:48 -0500
   • Re: foul called without knowing direction (42 lines)
     From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:45:14 -0600

8. Fred Speirs
   • Fred Speirs (23 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:27:15 -0500

9. Fred Speirs :-(
   • Fred Speirs :-( (18 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:43:52 -0800
   • Re: Fred Speirs :-( (35 lines)
     From: F Chester Miller III <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:11:32 -0800
   • Re: Fred Speirs :-( (46 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 11:57:48 -0500

10. GK Unable to Defend
    • GK Unable to Defend (30 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 11:47:24 -0800
    • Re: GK Unable to Defend (58 lines)
      From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 13:46:33 -0800
    • Re: GK Unable to Defend (21 lines)
      From: Rich Zumpone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:44:28 -0500
    • Re: GK Unable to Defend (50 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:49:22 -0800

11. Good scorers aided by "bigger goals"
    • Good scorers aided by "bigger goals" (22 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:53:17 -0600
    • Re: Good scorers aided by "bigger goals" (61 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:53:30 -0500
    • Re: Good scorers aided by "bigger goals" (30 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:09:34 -0800

12. Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in
    • Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (26 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:17:23 -0500
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (50 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:31:05 -0500
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (55 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:52:05 -0800
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (67 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:58:28 -0600
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (80 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:00:55 -0500
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (106 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:16:22 -0600
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (107 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:05:31 -0500
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (130 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:59:27 -0800
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (145 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:17:18 -0500
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (161 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:34:28 -0800
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (49 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:49:05 -0500
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (46 lines)
      From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:26:49 -0800
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (67 lines)
      From: Bob Foster <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 11:40:20 EST
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (46 lines)
      From: Gary Voshol <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:20:14 +0000
    • Re: Historical interps of 2 hands and throw in (44 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:02:36 -0500

13. How bad is it?
    • How bad is it? (18 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 15:10:24 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (28 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 17:55:31 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (33 lines)
      From: Richard Houser <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:12:38 -0800
    • Re: How bad is it? (27 lines)
      From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:02:33 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (15 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:27:14 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (37 lines)
      From: Joe Bean <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:30:49 -0800
    • Re: How bad is it? (21 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:19:32 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (30 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 13:10:41 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (47 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:38:48 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (73 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 19:55:48 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (84 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:00:28 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (43 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 09:24:57 -0800
    • Re: How bad is it? (62 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 12:47:01 -0500
    • Re: How bad is it? (24 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:03:23 -0800
    • Re: How bad is it? (41 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:09:21 -0800
    • Re: How bad is it? (68 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:28:46 -0800
    • Re: How bad is it? (28 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:20:50 -0500

14. If you're going to play, then Play
    • If you're going to play, then Play (29 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 16:53:31 -0500
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (51 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:22:48 -0800
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (36 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:29:42 -0800
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (43 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 17:35:09 -0500
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (64 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 14:55:03 -0800
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (43 lines)
      From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:16:00 -0800
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (47 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:20:05 +0000
    • Re: If you're going to play, then Play (77 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 23:29:46 +0000

15. Just when you think you've heard everything ...
    • Just when you think you've heard everything ... (16 lines)
      From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:39:24 -0500
    • Re: Just when you think you've heard everything ... (34 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:47:38 -0800

16. newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction
    • newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (45 lines)
      From: Ken Olmsted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:31:34 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (81 lines)
      From: David Bassett <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:04:10 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (60 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:16:48 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (61 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 04:23:36 -0600
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (50 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:07:08 -0500
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (69 lines)
      From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 05:53:56 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (32 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:51:02 EST
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (53 lines)
      From: Bill Noyes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:14:58 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (106 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:08:27 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (161 lines)
      From: Ken Olmsted <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:46:24 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (61 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:28:21 -0500
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (124 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:32:57 -0800
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (85 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:01:16 -0500
    • Re: newbie has Q - foul called without knowing direction (28 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 12:05:18 -0800

17. no goal and AR
    • no goal and AR (15 lines)
      From: So Cal Lurker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 23:01:21 -0500
    • Re: no goal and AR (42 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:18:39 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (31 lines)
      From: WSARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:20:06 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (31 lines)
      From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 20:22:01 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (65 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:23:34 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (29 lines)
      From: Dennis Shimer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 06:58:31 -0500
    • Re: no goal and AR (66 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:36:08 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (40 lines)
      From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:02:16 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (49 lines)
      From: cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 07:30:55 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (60 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:06:41 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (39 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 08:34:14 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (59 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 10:43:30 -0600
    • Re: no goal and AR (29 lines)
      From: Wendell Crain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:44:21 -0500
    • Re: no goal and AR (73 lines)
      From: John Park <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 19:00:11 +0000
    • Re: no goal and AR (32 lines)
      From: Dave Wolgast <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:36:03 -0400
    • Re: no goal and AR (97 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:40:34 -0800
    • no goal and AR (47 lines)
      From: Wendell Crain <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:07:06 -0500
    • Re: no goal and AR (16 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:30:12 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (30 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:17:04 -0500
    • Re: no goal and AR (28 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:01:41 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (23 lines)
      From: William Guynes <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:20:19 -0500
    • Re: no goal and AR (56 lines)
      From: Larry Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:27:42 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (36 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:25:33 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (49 lines)
      From: Mike Skinner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 07:42:57 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (67 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:15:50 -0800
    • Re: no goal and AR (34 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 16:11:06 -0600
    • Re: no goal and AR (28 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 00:11:27 +0000
    • Re: no goal and AR (62 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:04:36 -0600
    • Re: no goal and AR (46 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:39:10 +0000

18. no goal and AR-coincidence
    • Re: no goal and AR-coincidence (27 lines)
      From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:48:05 -0500

19. No Subject
    • Re: No Subject (77 lines)
      From: Fred Speirs <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:27:00 -0500

20. orgy of soccer on DirecTV
    • orgy of soccer on DirecTV (27 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 22:41:17 -0500
    • Re: orgy of soccer on DirecTV (37 lines)
      From: James Kreuziger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 09:57:04 -0800

21. Pulling the strings of the puppets, er, the players
    • Pulling the strings of the puppets, er, the players (43 lines)
      From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 21:08:21 -0500
    • Re: Pulling the strings of the puppets, er, the players (73 lines)
      From: Jim <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:32:36 -0600
    • Re: Pulling the strings of the puppets, er, the players (60 lines)
      From: Mark A. Morin <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 18:47:23 -0800
    • Pulling the strings of the puppets, er, the players (55 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 07:48:57 +0000

22. Selling it
    • Selling it (37 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:07:51 -0500

23. SOCREF-L Digest - 3 Nov 2009 to 4 Nov 2009 (#2009-299)
    • Re: SOCREF-L Digest - 3 Nov 2009 to 4 Nov 2009 (#2009-299) (38 lines)
      From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 08:40:06 -0800

24. The bench side
    • The bench side (90 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 19:23:50 -0500

25. The New Fitness Standards For 2010
    • Re: The New Fitness Standards For 2010 (39 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:39:00 -0800
    • Re: The New Fitness Standards For 2010 (65 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 15:13:48 -0800

26. Women Playing CLEAN hard soccer (UNC v. BU last night)
    • Women Playing CLEAN hard soccer (UNC v. BU last night) (34 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:22:05 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing CLEAN hard soccer (UNC v. BU last night) (45 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 08:16:25 -0500

27. Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip)
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (31 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:34:13 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (32 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:01:16 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (44 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:36:32 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (37 lines)
      From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:01:33 -0800
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (63 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:06:18 -0800
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (38 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:49:01 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (22 lines)
      From: Bradley Condo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:57:10 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (35 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:29:13 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (30 lines)
      From: Bradley Condo <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:36:17 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (77 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:39:41 -0800
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (38 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:44:45 -0800
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (51 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:44:31 -0800
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (40 lines)
      From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:44:02 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (57 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 16:56:42 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (23 lines)
      From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 18:39:57 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (33 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:39:36 -0500
    • Re: Women Playing Rough, Dirty Soccer (video clip) (27 lines)
      From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:41:23 -0500