SOCREF-L Archives – December 2009, week 3

1. "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch
   • "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (27 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:59:09 -0500
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (32 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:13:03 -0800
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (19 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:13:55 -0500
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (53 lines)
     From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:07:27 -0500
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (68 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:27:27 -0500
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (61 lines)
     From: Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:18:57 -0800
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (20 lines)
     From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:58:37 -0500
   • Re: "Kill the Referee" Movie -- must watch (88 lines)
     From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:35:56 -0800

2. 2010 FIFA World Cup match ball Jabulani
   • 2010 FIFA World Cup match ball Jabulani (36 lines)
     From: Charlie Westerfield <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:03:29 -0500
   • Re: 2010 FIFA World Cup match ball Jabulani (29 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:31:12 -0500

3. Associations of independent contractor referees (was: missing schools game fees)
   • Associations of independent contractor referees (was: missing schools game fees) (78 lines)
     From: Jim Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:29:50 -0500

4. definition of SFP (Was: Re: The solution is worse than the problem)
   • definition of SFP (Was: Re: The solution is worse than the problem) (28 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:24:43 +0000

5. Expression of support
   • Expression of support (90 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:33:00 -0500
   • Re: Expression of support (17 lines)
     From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:53:37 -0500
   • Re: Expression of support (45 lines)
     From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:02:56 -0500

6. Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (14 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:18:06 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (40 lines)
     From: Wickham, Dennis <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:30:07 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (48 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:40:48 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (21 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:03:22 -0600
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (32 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:08:12 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (40 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:25:43 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (61 lines)
     From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:53:21 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (42 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:27:53 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (93 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:58:18 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (19 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:07:30 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (54 lines)
     From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:07:50 -0600
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (32 lines)
     From: Gary Saxer <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:55:17 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (33 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:23:08 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (27 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:57:39 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (49 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:06:50 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (25 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:57:02 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (38 lines)
     From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:07:01 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (56 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:30:26 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (27 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:21:30 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (20 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:39:41 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (35 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:44:56 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (26 lines)
     From: Ed Bellion <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:51:37 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (64 lines)
     From: Christopher Seiwald <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:24:09 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (60 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:49:41 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (31 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:36:29 -0800
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (17 lines)
     From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:38:00 -0600
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (23 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:49:39 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (19 lines)
     From: Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:54:36 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (27 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:11:50 -0500
   • Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS (34 lines)
     From: Simon Guenzl <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:19:45 -0500

7. Hog the ball, kid - The Boston Globe
   • Hog the ball, kid - The Boston Globe (180 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:25:31 -0500
   • Re: Hog the ball, kid - The Boston Globe (276 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:43:25 -0800
   • Re: Hog the ball, kid - The Boston Globe (216 lines)
     From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:30:14 -0800
   • Re: Hog the ball, kid - The Boston Globe (114 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:46:18 -0500
   • Re: Hog the ball, kid - The Boston Globe (266 lines)
     From: Lawrence Savell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:14:48 -0800

8. Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action
   • Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action (44 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:49:12 -0500
   • Re: Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action (71 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:32:19 -0800

9. Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action: Another Twist
   • Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action: Another Twist (76 lines)
     From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:56:55 -0500
   • Re: Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action: Another Twist (97 lines)
     From: Ron Leedy <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:49:05 -0800
   • Re: Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action: Another Twist (30 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:22:28 +0000
   • Re: Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action: Another Twist (59 lines)
     From: Craig & Maggie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:04:28 -0600
   • Re: Hypothetical scenario and Referee Action: Another Twist (66 lines)
     From: Craig & Maggie <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 16:06:45 -0600

10. Maybe soccer referees can do the same
    • Maybe soccer referees can do the same (20 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:23:05 -0500

11. missing schools game fees
    • missing schools game fees (51 lines)
      From: D A <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 19:01:39 -0500
    • Re: missing schools game fees (81 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 06:54:09 -0500
    • Re: missing schools game fees (94 lines)
      From: Patrick Duffy <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:19:29 -0800

12. On offside in EPL
    • On offside in EPL (26 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:04:24 -0500
    • Re: On offside in EPL (39 lines)
      From: Thomas Coatoam <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:41:22 +0000

13. PK or Offside?
    • Re: PK or Offside? (42 lines)
      From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:25:24 -0600
    • Re: PK or Offside? (61 lines)
      From: Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:20:49 -0600
    • Re: PK or Offside? (102 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:31:16 -0500
    • Re: PK or Offside? (79 lines)
      From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:06:45 -0500
    • Re: PK or Offside? (35 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:54:23 -0800
    • Re: PK or Offside? (39 lines)
      From: Donohoe, Patrick <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:27:13 -0500
    • Re: PK or Offside? (19 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:34:34 -0600
    • Re: PK or Offside? (44 lines)
      From: Soccer <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:25:51 -0500
    • Re: PK or Offside? (62 lines)
      From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:28:48 -0800

14. Recert cancels or no shows...
    • Recert cancels or no shows... (22 lines)
      From: ced53 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:11:27 -0800
    • Re: Recert cancels or no shows... (13 lines)
      From: William L Carey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 07:54:44 EST
    • Re: Recert cancels or no shows... (39 lines)
      From: ced53 <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:31:17 -0800
    • Re: Recert cancels or no shows... (51 lines)
      From: Jeff Brenner <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:40:15 -0500

15. Replay of the replay - France vs Ireland
    • Replay of the replay - France vs Ireland (23 lines)
      From: Phil Dillard <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:53:53 -0500
    • Re: Replay of the replay - France vs Ireland (45 lines)
      From: WS-ARA <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:54:02 -0800

16. The solution is worse than the problem
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (22 lines)
      From: Rich B <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:39:38 -0500
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (46 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:35:33 -0500
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (26 lines)
      From: Brian Smith-White <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:07:34 -0500
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (49 lines)
      From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:52:00 -0500
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (65 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:01:11 -0500
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (26 lines)
      From: Rich B <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:32:23 -0500
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (19 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:40:22 -0600
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (46 lines)
      From: Glenn Sogge <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:34:00 -0600
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (66 lines)
      From: George Parker <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:27:45 -0600
    • Re: The solution is worse than the problem (35 lines)
      From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:16:41 -0500

17. Tracking down those payments for refereeing
    • Tracking down those payments for refereeing (60 lines)
      From: Tom Stagliano <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:47:02 -0500
    • Re: Tracking down those payments for refereeing (30 lines)
      From: Chris Mohr <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:37:45 -0500
    • Re: Tracking down those payments for refereeing (65 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:35:48 -0500
    • Re: Tracking down those payments for refereeing (47 lines)
      From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:24:04 +0000
    • Re: Tracking down those payments for refereeing (163 lines)
      From: [log in to unmask]
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:42:26 -0500
    • Re: Tracking down those payments for refereeing (184 lines)
      From: Larry Huey <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:58:01 -0500
    • Re: Tracking down those payments for refereeing (92 lines)
      From: Mark Merritt <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:02:40 -0700

18. west ham v chelsea pk
    • west ham v chelsea pk (18 lines)
      From: lee jordan <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 07:56:51 -0800
    • Re: west ham v chelsea pk (23 lines)
      From: Richard Critz <[log in to unmask]>
      Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:39:12 -0500