SOCREF-L Archives – June 2011, week 5

1. Bajramaj's shinguards(?)
   • Bajramaj's shinguards(?) (12 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:34:49 -0500
   • Re: Bajramaj's shinguards(?) (22 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:46:03 -0400
   • Re: Bajramaj's shinguards(?) (18 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:42:09 -0500

2. Brazil-Australia WWC -no score
   • Brazil-Australia WWC -no score (17 lines)
     From: Enrique Dentone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:31:15 -0400
   • Re: Brazil-Australia WWC -no score (24 lines)
     From: Jim Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:57:41 -0400
   • Re: Brazil-Australia WWC -no score (26 lines)
     From: Cpschwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:19:57 -0600

3. Kari Seitz gets key matchup in Group D
   • Kari Seitz gets key matchup in Group D (26 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 12:26:13 -0500

4. Protecting the Goalkeeper
   • Protecting the Goalkeeper (38 lines)
     From: Bill Robinson <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:42:38 -0700
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (59 lines)
     From: Scott Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:02:22 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (94 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:23:32 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (31 lines)
     From: Larry Stone <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:55:00 -0500
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (130 lines)
     From: Stu Power <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:03:14 -0700
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (136 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:30:55 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (166 lines)
     From: Scott Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:12:40 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (184 lines)
     From: CP Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:22:41 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (195 lines)
     From: tj marlin <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:11:55 -0700
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (171 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:37:13 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (186 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:34:13 +0000
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (317 lines)
     From: Scott Mitchell <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 02:16:49 -0400
   • Re: Protecting the Goalkeeper (21 lines)
     From: Ed Leafe <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:55:19 -0400

5. The Swiss Miss is back! Well, not really, but for all practical purposes, yeah.
   • The Swiss Miss is back! Well, not really, but for all practical purposes, yeah. (40 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:02:00 -0400
   • Re: The Swiss Miss is back! Well, not really, but for all practical purposes, yeah. (54 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:09:34 -0400
   • Re: The Swiss Miss is back! Well, not really, but for all practical purposes, yeah. (56 lines)
     From: chris mohr <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:35:12 -0400
   • Re: The Swiss Miss is back! Well, not really, but for all practical purposes, yeah. (19 lines)
     From: Vince Hradil <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:48:10 -0500
   • Re: The Swiss Miss is back! Well, not really, but for all practical purposes, yeah. (28 lines)
     From: David Bassett <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:44:27 -0700

6. WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results)
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (74 lines)
     From: Jim Geissman <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:08:10 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (86 lines)
     From: Derek - AYSO West Los Angeles <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:10:40 +0000
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (78 lines)
     From: Jorge L. Gimeno <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:14:58 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (102 lines)
     From: Vince DeFranco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:16:07 -0500
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (68 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:16:55 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (104 lines)
     From: Paul Turney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:31:23 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (114 lines)
     From: Paul Turney <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:51:14 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (154 lines)
     From: Scott Riegelhaupt-Herzig <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:49:29 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (72 lines)
     From: Jim Dingley <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 06:50:22 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (85 lines)
     From: Derek - AYSO West Los Angeles <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:58:30 +0000
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (28 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:32:15 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (36 lines)
     From: Gil Weber <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:37:17 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (160 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:05:32 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (171 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:23:22 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (186 lines)
     From: Ed Marco <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:54:56 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (194 lines)
     From: Domal, Roger <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:12:57 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (46 lines)
     From: Burke, Rick A CIV OSD DMEA <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:15:52 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (23 lines)
     From: Joe Makowiec <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:09:06 -0400
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (63 lines)
     From: Ron Antonette <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:39:29 -0700
   • Re: WWC: couple of interesting calls (no results) (52 lines)
     From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]>
     Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:01:29 +0000