Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (April 2000, week 1)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 6 Apr 2000 22:37:30 -0400
Reply-To:     Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
From:         The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: FIFA Ref dismissed
Comments: To: Soccer Ref List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

> In the case originally mentioned, the attacking player was clearly on-side > as dictated by the LOTG. No discretion is given to the referee in calling > this - the LOTG are clear on the issue. Calling off-side is not applying the > SOTG, rather is is breaking the LOTG. Hi, David, Yes, I think we're on the same page, however ask yourself why there is no specific section in LOTG dealing with a legitimately injured player keeping an opponent onside. Is it because IFAB (a) have considerd this case and deliberately want the injured player to be counted as a defender, or (b) because they try to keep everything brief and not go into all possible rare situations, in the expectation that the referee will apply SOTG over LOTG when the situation warrants? Cheerio Jim #16


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager