Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (August 2001, week 3)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 17 Aug 2001 17:01:43 -0700
Reply-To:     Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
From:         The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Traditional players numbers (non-referee)
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

>> 6 5 4 >> >> >> 3 2 >> >> >> 1 (gk) >> >> > >Pretty close, Jim! > >The pattern was called the W-M formation, with the W being the forwards as >you indicate (so Stan Matthews was always #7) and the defenders lined up in >the M > > 6 4 > >3 5 2 > >while your pattern was obviously an earlier version where the centre-half >really was a half-back and not what is now commonly called a centre-back. >Billy Wright played in #5 in this spot, for example. When I first started, I played #4 as in my diagram. I don't remember who the true defenders other than 2 and 3 were; I assume there must have been at least one more, although our #5, the center half, was an all-rounder and captain (college team). Even as formations change, if a team allocates numbers 1-11 (which is rare these days) they still seem to be given to players in approximately those locations. I can still remember when I saw roughly that formation with the numbers on the backs of 7-Gento, 9-DiStefano and 10-Puskas -- Real Madrid in their heyday.


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager