Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (September 2001, week 4)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:49:52 -0300
Reply-To:     Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
From:         James Keast <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: some late afternoon fun
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
              from "Rick Troup" at Sep 25, 2001 05:29:21 PM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Rick Troup wrote: > > Under 19 boys competitive league > Player A on attacking team > Player B on attacking team > > Player A takes a shot that has a chance to go into the top of the net > Player B, in the area, attempts to head the ball into the net - is not > in offside position > Player B, missing the ball, somehow uses his hand to deflect the ball > back out - away from the goal - frustration, stupidity, the uncluttered > mind of a 19 year old hoping that no one would see this????? Who knows > > The referee, enforcing the laws of the game, sends player B off for > intentionally denying a goal scoring opportunity What Law is the Referee enforcing here? This is a misapplication of the Letter and more importantly the Spirit of the Law. > > When I heard of this I took the position that player B should have been, > at the worst, cautioned for unsporting behavior - logic would tell us > that an attacker is not going to deliberately deny a goal for his own > team - logic and common sense should have prevailed There is no USB here either. > > Wonder if the referee awarded a p k, since the foul was in the area - > probably not; but would have been a nice touch to an otherwise untenable > situation > > The only way that this send off can be changed is for the referee to > admit to a mis-application of the laws of the game; but is it a > mis-application in the most literal sense - if not, the player sits this > weekend, and has accumulated a minimum of 12 caution points for Why would the player sit? This is an _error_ in fact and unless the Referee mispresents his report the committee should set it aside. The Law _clearly_ says a player may be sent off for denying the _opposing_ team an goal or OGSO. > himself/his team; points are accumulated from the beginning of the fall > season, and don't end until june 30th, 2002 (at 48 the coach gets to > explain what's going on - at 60, the coach, the manager, and the entire > team get to have a hearing to explain why the team should not be > disbanded) This is rediculous. -- James Keast | [log in to unmask] | Technology Junkie | N.I.T.R.W. Dalhousie University (Bsc, '97) | University of Waterloo (MMath, '99) Canadian Referee and Assessor | www.xdal.org/~james/


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager