Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (January 2003, week 1)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Thu, 2 Jan 2003 17:54:42 -0800
Reply-To:     The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
From:         The Geissmans <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Blue Shirt
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

Of course you had never thought of it that way. What a bunch of nonsense. At 05:18 PM 01/02/2003 -0800, Michael Lance wrote: >Interesting situation three weeks ago: Arrived for a HS V-B match >assigned as a Dual (no, I don't like doing dual especially varsity >boys!). One team in yellow, the other in black, yellow keeper in green, >black keeper in white. Being the first referee there, naturally assumed >long sleve red. > >Second referee arrived about 10 minutes later, and asked if I had a blue >long sleve and if so could we go in blue. No problem (since I got a >complimentary long sleve OSI blue at a regional amateur tournament >sponsored by OSI and Addidas), but asked why? Response from my fellow >referee "Red is an adversarial color, especially in soccer." > >Had not thought about it that way! Maybe black, blue, green, etc., >might be perceived differently than stepping on to the field wearing >caution or send-off colors....


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager