Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (December 2005, week 3)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:54:13 -0600
Reply-To:     Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Bill Liedtke <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: is it a trip?
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Oops - that should be Player A goes over the leg in my last paragraph. corrected below Bill -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Bill Liedtke Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 12:52 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: is it a trip? YHTBT but doesn't sound foul to me. To quote an older version of the ATR - "Players, however, may trip or fall over an opponent as a result of natural play and no infringement of the Law has been committed." The situation you describe seems to fall in that realm. To paraphrase further, tripping is generally directed at an opponent. Here player B not only was trying to play the ball, but in fact actually played the ball and Player A fell over her outstretched leg after the fair tackle of the ball. Granted, getting ball does not make every tackle fair, but your facts make no mention of Player B coming in out of control, or carelessly, recklessly or with excessive force. Your facts also make it clear that Player B did not tackle for the ball in a manner by which she knew or should have known that it was inevitable that the tackle would take Player A's legs out from under her. In fact you imply Player A had an option as to direction. Now your fact situation gets a bit more complex if Player B tries to tackle the ball and misses - and then player "A" goes over the leg. Then the ITOOTR decision process becomes a lot more complex, and you have to really determine the fairness of the challenge with a more skeptical eye. And not only do YHTBT, YHTBT for the whole game leading up to that attempted tackle and have gauged the skill and temperature of those players. Bill Liedtke OKC OK 07 and waiting for the snow -----Original Message----- From: Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Christopher Seiwald Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2005 12:21 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: is it a trip? OK, I see this a lot, the most recently at a high school JV girls game. Team A player has ball. Team B player sticks foot into path of ball but not in path of Team A player and deflects ball. Team A player changes direction (possibly to follow ball) and falls over the greatly extended leg of Team B player. I've been saying "no foul," which is tough to sell because _everyone_ sees player A fall over the leg of player B. It is also tough to call because the amount of turning required to fall over the leg varies: sometimes it requires an about face, but sometimes the extended leg is just a slight turn away. Am I making it too hard on myself? Should I just blow the whistle against the player who plants her extended leg in any of the possible paths of an opponent? Christopher USSF 8 Alameda, CA


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager