Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous (more recent) messageNext (less recent) messagePrevious (more recent) in topicNext (less recent) in topicPrevious (more recent) by same authorNext (less recent) by same authorPrevious page (May 2006, week 4)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Fri, 26 May 2006 09:46:45 -0400
Reply-To:     Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Neil Montgomery <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Denial of scoring opp. and cards
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

The Geissmans wrote: > Fred, I realize you're being diplomatic, but you seem to say there is > only one possible way to interpret this situation, no matter what other > considerations may be brought to bear. Pot, kettle, black, from one who has hung his hat on "my way follows the spirit, and the other way is the book way." The fact that the "other way" is the book way is only one argument in its favour, but not necessarily the biggest. I have attempted to communicate as strongly as I can that I really think what Lehmann did was a gross offense against the game itself and thoroughly deserving of a red card. In other words, I really think the spirit of the game is best served with both the goal and the dismissal. I also concede that my view will not carry the day, and that's fine. I still think the IFAB should make an explicit announcement on this matter, since it is such a crucial point of interpretation for a situation that is exceedingly rare. Neil


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager