Date:         Wed, 24 May 2006 17:50:58 -0700
Reply-To:     [log in to unmask]
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Reza Pazirandeh <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: Denial of scoring opp. and cards
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Mr. Albany suggests "no cards at all".

DA, can you elaborate further - your philosophy, reasoning, etc.?  I did
not see the UEFA final scenario and what/why the ref (apparently)
acknowledged.

Reza Pazirandeh

-----Original Message-----
But had the ref waited and allowed the score AND then ejected the
keeper, he likely would have been excoriated by the likes of Blatter,
even though that is the correct response.  The ref himself even stated
that had he waited, he would have awarded the goal and given a caution,
just as Mr Albany states.

DA:
> 
> [If no other misconduct took place] If a goal is scored (by same
attacker or
> his/her team mate) do not
> use cards at all. Your cards will backfire on you.
> The UEFA final case is a classic example of "NO CARDS" necessary.
> Herr Sepp Blatter was mad at the referee ... he blasted him in public.
> The ref (apparently) did acknowledge hius error.
> 
> DA