Date:Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:30:07 -0800
Reply-To:Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
<[log in to unmask]>
From:"Wickham, Dennis" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:Re: Gerrard non-penalty LIV-ARS
In-Reply-To:A<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sometimes there really is a wolf! But, someone gets eaten when trust is
lost.
Isn't this the real world cost for diving - - - that referees set a higher
level of certainty before calling penalty kick for players who sometimes dive
and a lesser level of certainty with players who always stay on their feet?
Economists would love the self-correcting notion that cheaters never prosper,
yet a cheating defender has.
If there had been an additional assistant referee near the goal line, would
the penalty have been awarded?
Dennis
100% penalty kick!
Ed
IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the Internal Revenue Service, we inform you that any U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (or in any attachment) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed in this communication (or in any attachment).
Confidential - December 15, 2009
This email and any associated files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for [log in to unmask] If you are not the named addressee do not disseminate, distribute, copy or alter this email. Please notify Seltzer Caplan McMahon Vitek by telephone at 619.685.3003, you will be reimbursed for any reasonable costs.
Warning: SCMV has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this email, the firm cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
Please read the legal disclaimer at www.scmv.com\e-disclaimer that govern this email and any attachments.
