in the original post, not stated, the game was stopped for an injury.
therefor the restart is a db.
if the game is stopped to issue a caution, then the restart is an IFK.
see ferenc's quote of yesterday.
regards
Reza Pazirandeh wrote:
> What an honor to out a lurker:-)
>
> That would definitely be the correct restart if he stopped it for an
> injury. I did not notice that and unfortunately I did not record the game
> to view it again.
>
> That notwithstanding, if the referee does decide not to wait for the next
> stoppage to give the caution (or, sendoff, as unlikely as that might be), I
> believe the correct restart is still a DB.
>
> Reza.
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jimmy Stewart <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>> Okay, I don't post very often on this listserver, I've been a subscriber
>> for quite some time and mostly lurk.....in this case, I feel compelled to
>> respond. Please go back and look at the sequence of events and the reaction
>> of the players. Yes, there was a foul and I think we all agree that there
>> is misconduct. The referee applied advantage. Then the players stop. Why?
>> There is an injured player down. The referee stops play for the injury.
>> This is the opportunity to cite the misconduct (ie the next stoppage in
>> play). How do we restart play when stopping for an injury?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tj marlin
Coach, you were expecting to see the end of the game today?
- Lin Lipensky