Skip
repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (November 2010, week 1)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:         Mon, 1 Nov 2010 08:23:05 -0500
Reply-To:     Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:       Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees
              <[log in to unmask]>
From:         Sandy and Ferenc Korompai <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:      Re: What's the official reason for the disqualification?
In-Reply-To:  <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

In the pre-card days the Charlton brothers learned about their having been cautioned in the 1966 ENG-ARG WC match from the next morning's newspapers. According to another source Bobby officially learned of the caution from FIFA in 1998 ruining Sir Charles' perceived immaculate record. The showing of the card should have no role in the event. Simunic was not sent off after the second caution for lack of red card but for lack of decision by the referee (and probably through the failure of the 4th) Ferenc ----- Original Message ----- From: Brian Smith-White<mailto:[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 8:21 PM Subject: Re: What's the official reason for the disqualification? A thought scenario to focus on communication/event. A player is cautioned a second time. Prior to being shown the red card a fight breaks out. Lots of punching, kicking, spitting. A brawl. The referee quickly shows the red card to 5 people on one team and 6 people on the other. The match is over - at least one team has fewer than the minimum number of players. While writing up the match report it becomes obvious that the player who received the second caution didn't participate in the brawl. Thus the player received two cautions but no red card. Do you add the red card despite not showing it? Is the player eligible for the next match? Extra credit - if the player attempts to participate in the next match (they never saw a red card and thus would have no reason to suspect they are suspended) and the referee attempts to deny them permission, what happens if they the team files a grievance? BSW


Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager