repetitive navigational links
L-Soft  -  Home of  the  LISTSERV  mailing list  manager LISTSERV(R) 14.3
Skip repetitive navigational links
Previous messageNext messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext by same authorPrevious page (February 2011, week 1)Back to main SOCREF-L pageJoin or leave SOCREF-LReplyPost a new messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional fontLog in
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2011 11:08:01 -0800
Reply-To:   Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
Sender:   Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]>
From:   cmohrworld <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:   Re: [AYSO-L] Reffing Question
In-Reply-To:   <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:   text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Unless the ball is positioned close enough on the near-side of the lead AR that he could optionally set the wall and let me hang back nearer where I'd want to be when the kick was actually taken, THEN chances are that the closest AR to the ball spot is going to be at least 25, and probably more yards away, whereas as CR I'm obviously going to be in the immediate vicinity of the FK and wall. The AR's presence at that distance won't at all discourage an attacker inclined to favorably fudge the spot on a free kick from attempting to do so. For the least distant AR to intervene by either speaking directly to the fudging attacker or else to me about what's going on behind my back, will require the AR to use a sharp, at least somewhat loud voice, and while as CR I generally WELCOME active help from my ARs, this is NOT AT ALL an instance where his having to intervene because the CR's back was turned to the ball is a constructive development for the CR's credibility and game control, necessary though it was under the circumstances. IF the AR had to alert the CR about some sort of mischief going on behind his back because the CR was momentarily occupied with dealing with another urgent situation in front of him, then it's understandable he might should need and get help from the AR, because the CR cannot be looking everywhere at once. However, there's NOTHING so urgently demanding about determining with foot-laser measurement accuracy where ten yards distance is from the ball to justify the referee turning his back on a potentially fudge-inclined attacker, when there's an abundance of sufficiently accurate heuristic methods for determining close-enough where "at least" ten yards is (besides, walking off the distance isn't even all that accurate to begin with). Let's assume the CR does have his back to the ball, the attacker fudges, the AR intervenes, and we need to restore the ball to the proper spot. Neither team is going to be inclined to completely trust that either the CR or AR accurately indicated the proper original spot, the AR because he was at least 25-30 yards distant and didn't know more accurately than within 2-3 yards to begin with (he only knew for sure that the attacker was fudging the spot), the CR because he had his back turned when it happened.

Let's just say I've been there, done that with turning my back on the ball on a free kick in a very competitive BU16 game, and DID get help from my ARs spotting each team's attackers trying to fudge the ball on free kicks while I was setting the wall. I learned as much as I ever want to that game about exactly why turning your back on either the ball or the wall while setting it is a very unsound idea.

THE REASON most refs don't give ten yards isn't because they don't step it's because they lack the will to determinedly force the wall back far enough, at least unless they step it off. I don't need to do that to know what "at least" ten yards is by visual estimation, using a variety of clues (e.g. for just one, how tall are the players?)

Chris Mohr

----- Original Message ---- From: "Domal, Roger" <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 9:11:25 PM Subject: Re: [AYSO-L] Reffing Question

And what are your AR's doing?

----- Original Message ----- From: Discussion of Topics for Soccer Referees <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thu Feb 03 20:37:00 2011 Subject: Re: [AYSO-L] Reffing Question

The other problem with explicitly pacing off ten yards is that it's extremely difficult to perform without having your back turned to the ball while doing so.

This presents an opportunity for an attacker to move the ball forward from where it should be placed (and where your ten yards is being measured from) - which some attackers on some teams WILL find an irresistible invitation to do so. The worst problem for the referee when this happens isn't dealing with the yard or two closer distance or better angle the attacker tries to fudge behind the referee's back, but rather the seeds of dissension between the teams and toward the referee this can spark off. Even if you make the attackers move the ball back where it was supposed to be, both teams know it happened while you weren't looking, and neither team will have full confidence you have truly accurate memory of where it was really supposed to be.

Don't turn your back on *either* the ball or the defensive players who will be in the wall on an impending free kick (!!) Learn what ten yards looks like, and

move the wall back while facing sideways to both, so you keep both in view!

Chris Mohr

----- Original Message ---- From: doug smith <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 4:36:49 PM Subject: Re: [AYSO-L] Reffing Question

While not wishing to seem to speak for those who judge the "10-yard pace-off" as

unprofessional, I can envision that the style of pacing-off that is objectionable involves the referee walking to the ball, turning, pausing, and stereotypically marching ten exact paces toward goal - hoping that no defenders need to be pushed or cajoled out of the path on the way.

My main objection to this method is that it is unnecessary. If the field markings do not make the correct distance obvious, the only thing the referee need do is sell the call, that this point right here is, ITOOTR, 10 yards. "If you don't like my 10, try giving me more than 7 to start with. And you'll get the same call at your end of the field."

Doug Smith

> > I have seen a lot of good and competent referees pace off the 10 yards - > even at high levels. And of course, I saw Collina do it - deliberately and > with his back to the ball - in the last WC he refereed. I do it sometimes > when it serves a purpose. Not sure what makes it so unprofessional. > > Reza. > > On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Jim Geissman wrote: > > > > > > > Also, it says it's "unprofessional" for a ref to visibly pace off 10 > > yards. The ref in the video visibly paces off 10 yards every time. > > Oh, really, if you walk backwards, then that's not visible? > > > >

Back to: Top of message | Previous page | Main SOCREF-L page

LISTSERV.URI.EDU CataList email list search Powered by LISTSERV email list manager